- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02520310
AVJ-514 Japan Trial
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the treatment of symptomatic chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in Japanese subjects deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team.
Patients will be evaluated at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years in Japanese Medical Centers.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kanagawa, Japan
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
-
Miyagi, Japan
- Sendai Kosei Hospital
-
Osaka, Japan
- National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Keio University Hospital
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Sakakibara Heart Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Age 20 years or older.
- Symptomatic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe MR (4+) chronic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (DMR) or Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) determined by assessment of a qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) obtained within 90 days and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) obtained within180 days prior to subject registration, with MR severity based principally on the TTE study and confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). The ECL may request a TEE.
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥ 30% within 90 days prior to subject registration, assessed by the site using any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Note: The method must provide a quantitative readout (not a visual assessment).
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification is class II, class III, or ambulatory class IV.
Subject is deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery due to either Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) surgical mortality risk for mitral valve replacement of ≥ 8% OR due to the presence of one of the following risk factors:
- Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma
- Post-radiation mediastinum
- Previous mediastinitis
- Functional MR with LVEF < 40%
- Over 75 years old with LVEF < 40%
- Re-operation with patent grafts
- Two or more prior cardiothoracic surgeries
- Hepatic cirrhosis
- Other surgical risk factor(s)
- Mitral valve area ≥ 4.0 cm2 assessed by ECL based TTE within 90 days prior to subject registration. The ECL may request a TEE.
- Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) is ≤ 60mm assessed by site based on the TTE obtained within 90 days prior to subject registration.
- The primary regurgitant jet is non-commissural based on TEE, and in the opinion of the AVJ-514 implanting investigator can successfully be treated by the AVJ-514. If a secondary jet exists, it must be considered clinically insignificant.
- Transseptal catheterization and femoral vein access is determined to be feasible by the treating physician.
- The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
- LVEF is < 30%
Leaflet anatomy which may preclude AVJ-514 implantation, proper positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR by the AVJ-514 based. This evaluation is based on TEE evaluation of the mitral valve within 180 days prior to subject registration and includes:
- Insufficient mobile leaflet available for grasping with the AVJ-514 device
- Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support in the grasping area
- Evidence of significant calcification in the grasping area
- Presence of a significant cleft in the grasping area
- Life expectancy < 1 year due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
- Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason
- Prior open heart mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic disease (i.e. noncompliant, perforated).
- Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or significant myocardial ischemia or evidence of an acute myocardial infarction in the prior 90 days of registration.
- Cerebrovascular accident within 180 days prior to registration
- Severe symptomatic carotid stenosis (> 70% by ultrasound)
- Any cardiac surgery within 180 days prior to registration
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the last 30 days prior to registration
- Implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Cardioverter Defibrillator (CRT-D) pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)within the last 30 days prior to registration.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within the last 30 days prior to registration.
- Severe tricuspid regurgitation or aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment.
- In the judgment of the Investigator, the femoral vein cannot accommodate a 24 F catheter or presence of ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure < 90 mmHg without afterload reduction drug or cardiogenic shock or intra-aortic balloon pump.
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or subject will refuse blood transfusions.
- Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, patients may enroll at least 14 days after discontinuation of antibiotics). Patients must be free from infection prior to treatment. Any required dental work should be completed a minimum of 21 days prior to treatment.
- Intravenous drug abuse or suspected inability to adhere to follow-up.
- Patients in whom TEE is contraindicated.
- A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to study or procedure medications which cannot be adequately managed medically.
- In the judgment of the Investigator, subjects in whom the presence of a permanent pacemaker or pacing leads would interfere with placement of the test device or the placement of the test device would disrupt the leads.
- Subject intends to participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study within a period of 1 year following the AVJ-514 procedure.
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints. (Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials).
- In the opinion of the investigator or designee, subject is unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason.
- In the opinion of the anesthesiologist, general anesthesia is contraindicated.
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy within next 1 year.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AVJ-514
The AVJ-514 system
|
Patients receiving AVJ-514 device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (APS)
Time Frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
|
APS is defined as successful implantation of the AVJ-514 device(s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ or less as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL) assessment of a discharge echocardiogram.
Subjects who die or who undergo mitral valve surgery before discharge are an APS failure.
|
On day 0 (the day of procedure)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
This outcome measure calculates the percentage of participants with MAE at 30 days (= total subjects with MAE/total subjects enrolled).
|
30 days
|
|
Percentage of Participants With MAE at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
This outcome measure calculates the percentage of participants with MAE at 30 days (= total subjects with MAE/total subjects enrolled).
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With MAE Occurring After the Femoral Vein Puncture for Transseptal Access
Time Frame: 30 days
|
MAE listed below will be adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee at 30 days:
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm^2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Not Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm^2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
SLDA is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the AVJ-514 device.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Not Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
SLDA is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the AVJ-514 device.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Defined as defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention.
|
30 days
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Device Implant Rate
Time Frame: On the day of procedure
|
Defined as the rate of successful delivery and deployment of one or more AVJ-514 device with echocardiographic evidence of leaflet approximation and retrieval of the delivery catheter.
|
On the day of procedure
|
|
Device Procedure Time
Time Frame: On the day of procedure
|
Defined as the time elapsed from the start of the transseptal procedure to the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is removed.
|
On the day of procedure
|
|
Total Procedure Time
Time Frame: On the day of procedure
|
Defined as the time elapsed from the first of any of the following: intravascular catheter placement, anesthesia or sedation, or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), to the removal of the last catheter and TEE.
|
On the day of procedure
|
|
Device Time
Time Frame: On the day of procedure
|
Defined as the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is placed in the intra-atrial septum until the time the AVJ-514 Delivery System (CDS) is retracted into the Steerable Guide Catheter.
|
On the day of procedure
|
|
Fluoroscopy Duration
Time Frame: On the day of procedure
|
Defined as the duration of exposure to fluoroscopy during the AVJ-514 procedure.
|
On the day of procedure
|
|
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/Critical Care Unit (CCU)/Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (ICU/CCU/PACU)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Length of stay in ICU/CCU/PACU is cumulative hours of Hospital stay in (PACU/CCU/ICU)
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay Excluding Rehabilitation Stay
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Length of hospital stay excluding rehabilitation stay = Length of hospital stay (Date of Discharge - Date of Admission)
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Length of Rehabilitation Stay
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Cumulative days of rehabilitation stay during hospitalization.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Discharge Status
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Location to which subject was discharged (home or another facility).
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Length of Stay (Not at Baseline Facility)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
If subject discharged to another facility (different from baseline facility), length of stay at facility to which subject was discharged.
Length of Stay (not at baseline facility) = Sum for all eligible log lines which had been entered in Electronic Data Capture (EDC) for ICU/CCU/PACU and rehabilitation.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity Grade
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
1 year
|
|
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
24 months
|
|
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
3 years
|
|
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography.
MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits.
The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat.
MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
|
4 years
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
30 days
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
6 months
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
1 year
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site.
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
24 months
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site.
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
3 years
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site.
In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves.
The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
|
4 years
|
|
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
30 days
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
6 months
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
30 days
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
6 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
24 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
3 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
4 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
30 days
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
6 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
24 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
3 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site.
Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography.
The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
|
4 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
30 days
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
6 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site
|
4 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
|
30 days
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
|
6 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
|
4 years
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
|
30 days
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
|
6 months
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
|
1 year
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
30 days
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
6 months
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
1 year
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
24 months
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
3 years
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
4 years
|
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP).
PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
|
5 years
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
|
30 days
|
|
Mitral Valve Area(MVA)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
|
6 months
|
|
Mitral Valve Area(MVA)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
|
1 year
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve
|
24 months
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve.
|
3 years
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve.
|
4 years
|
|
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
30 days
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
6 months
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
1 year
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
|
4 years
|
|
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
|
1 year
|
|
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
|
4 years
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
|
30 days
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
|
6 months
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
|
1 year
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
3 years
|
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
|
|
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
30 days
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
6 months
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
1 year
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Cardiac output as measured by the site.
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
24 months
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Cardiac output as measured by the site.
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
3 years
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Cardiac output as measured by the site.
Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
|
4 years
|
|
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
30 days
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
6 months
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
|
1 year
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
|
3 years
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area.
Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
|
4 years
|
|
Cardiac Index (CI)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
|
All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
|
3 years
|
|
|
All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
|
|
All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Number of Participants With the Primary Safety Composite of MAE at 1 Year
Time Frame: 12 months
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
No of Participants with the MAEs at 12 months.
One death and One Renal Failure was reported in two subjects.
|
12 months
|
|
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
Time Frame: 24 months
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
|
24 months
|
|
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
Time Frame: 3 years
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
|
3 years
|
|
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
Time Frame: 4 years
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
|
4 years
|
|
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
Time Frame: 5 years
|
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
|
5 years
|
|
Number of Patients With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
1 year
|
|
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
24 months
|
|
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
3 years
|
|
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
4 years
|
|
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Patients are comfortable at rest.
Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
|
5 years
|
|
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Quality of Life (KCCQ QoL) Scores
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 30 days
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
30 days
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
6 months
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 1 year
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
1 year
|
|
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline to 1 Year
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 Year
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
Baseline to 1 Year
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 24 months
|
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies.
A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant.
Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status.
Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
|
24 months
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
|
3 years
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 4 years
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
|
4 years
|
|
KCCQ QoL Scores
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
|
5 years
|
|
SF-36 QoL Scores
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
The Short Form(SF) (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The physical & mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score & Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 & 52, respectively while the norms for congestive heart failure (CHF) population are 31 & 46, respectively. |
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
SF-36 QoL Scores
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The physical & mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score & Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 & 52, respectively while the norms for CHF population are 31 & 46, respectively. |
30 days
|
|
SF-36 QoL Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
|
6 months
|
|
SF-36 QoL Scores
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
|
1 year
|
|
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline to 1 Year
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year
|
From baseline to 1 year
|
|
|
SF-36 QoL Scores
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
|
24 months
|
|
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Time Frame: At 24 months
|
At 24 months
|
|
|
Number of Participants Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: Through 5 years
|
Through 5 years
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Additional Mitra Clip Device Intervention
Time Frame: Through 5 years
|
Through 5 years
|
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
6 months
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
1 year
|
|
Changes in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance From Baseline to 1 Year
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 year
|
Baseline to 1 year
|
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
24 months
|
|
Changes in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance From Baseline
Time Frame: At 24 months
|
At 24 months
|
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
3 years
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 4 years
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
4 years
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians.
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD).
It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.
It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
|
5 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Surgical access to repair or replace the mitral valve.
Measured per occurrence.
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Surgical access to repair or replace the mitral valve.
Measured per occurrence.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Additional AVJ-514 Device Intervention
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Number of participants with any additional AVJ-514 procedure after the index procedure.
Measured per occurrence.
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Additional AVJ-514 Device Intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of participants with any additional AVJ-514 procedure after the index procedure.
Measured per occurrence.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Hospitalizations and Reason for Hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 year post index procedure
|
1 year post index procedure
|
|
|
Number of Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Number of Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 3 years
|
3 years
|
|
|
Number of Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
|
|
Number of Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 5 years
|
5 years
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Mitral Stenosis
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
1 year
|
|
Mitral Stenosis
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the site.
|
24 months
|
|
Mitral Stenosis
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
3 years
|
|
Mitral Stenosis
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
4 years
|
|
Mitral Stenosis
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
|
5 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
|
12 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
|
24 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
|
3 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
|
4 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
|
5 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Major bleeding is defined as bleeding ≥ Type 3 based on a modified Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition. Type 3:
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Major bleeding is defined as bleeding ≥ Type 3 based on a modified Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition. Type 3:
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Time Frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up.
Measured in overall counts.
|
At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
|
|
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up.
Measured in overall counts.
|
30 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up.
Measured in overall counts.
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up.
Measured in overall counts.
|
1 year
|
|
Rate of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the 1 Year Post-AVJ-514 Procedure Compared to the 1 Year Prior
Time Frame: 1 Year Pre and Post Index Procedure
|
1 Year Pre and Post Index Procedure
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Device Embolization Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Device embolization is defined as detachment of the deployed AVJ-514 device from both mitral leaflets.
|
1 year
|
|
Number of Participants With Device Embolization Not Requiring Surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Device embolization is defined as detachment of the deployed AVJ-514 device from both mitral leaflets.
|
1 year
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site.
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
2 year
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 3 year
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site.
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
3 year
|
|
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 4 year
|
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site.
Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
|
4 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ryohei Yozu, MD, PhD, Keio University
- Principal Investigator: Morimasa Takayama, MD, PhD, Sakakibara Heart Institute
- Study Director: Peter Staehr, MD, Abbott Vascular, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AVJ-514
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Regurgitation
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationUnited States
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationAustria, Lithuania, Germany
-
Xiao-dong ZhuangNot yet recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationChina
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationGermany
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedFunctional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerrative Mitral RegurgitationRussian Federation
-
Abbott Medical DevicesAbbottActive, not recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationUnited States, Canada, Spain, Israel, Germany, Italy, Japan, France, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia
-
Duk-Woo Park, MDCardioVascular Research Foundation, KoreaCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve RegurgitationKorea, Republic of
-
Abbott Medical DevicesAbbottCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationNetherlands, United Kingdom, United States, Spain, Israel, Germany, Italy, Switzerland
-
Abbott Medical DevicesAbbottCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationJapan
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoActive, not recruitingMitral RegurgitationItaly
Clinical Trials on AVJ-514
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.CompletedA Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CBL-514 in Participants With Dercum's Disease LipomasDercum's DiseaseUnited States
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Completed
-
MedImmune LLCCompletedAdvanced MalignanciesUnited States
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.CompletedSubcutaneous FatUnited States
-
University of RochesterCompletedSystolic Heart Failure | Atrial Fibrillation (Permanent)United States
-
Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting