EVEREST II Pivotal Study High Risk Registry (HRR) (HRR)

November 5, 2018 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

A Study of the Evalve® Cardiovascular Valve Repair (MitraClip®) System Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair STudy (EVEREST II) EVEREST II High Risk Registry

Prospective, multi-center, single arm registry. Clinical follow-up at discharge, 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24, months, and 3, 4 and 5 years.

Concurrent Control (CC) group identified retrospectively from the patients screened for the HRR who did not enroll; patient survival determined at 12 months. NCT00209274 (EVEREST II RCT) Intended use Percutaneous reduction of clinically significant mitral regurgitation in symptomatic patients who are considered to be high risk for operative mortality (high surgical risk).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The EVEREST II HRR is a single-arm prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolling high surgical risk patients of the EVEREST II study (NCT00209274).

Patients were considered high surgical risk if either their Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) predicted operative mortality risk was ≥ 12%, or the surgeon investigator determined the patient to be high risk (≥ 12% predicted operative mortality risk) due to the presence of, at a minimum, one of the following pre-specified risk factors:

  • Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma
  • Post-radiation mediastinum
  • Previous mediastinitis
  • Functional MR with ejection fraction (EF) < 40%
  • Over 75 years old with EF < 40%
  • Prior re-operation with patent grafts
  • Two or more prior chest surgeries
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • Three or more of the following STS high risk factors:

    i. Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL ii. Prior chest surgery iii. Age over 75 iv. EF < 35%

Upon completion of enrollment in the HRR, a process was initiated to ensure patient consent to participate in a Concurrent Control (CC) group was in place. Patients were identified to determine survival through 12 months with current standard of care treatment.CC patients were derived from a cohort of patients screened for enrollment in the HRR,yet did not enroll. All patients had moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR based on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). To be considered eligible for inclusion in the CC group, the patient had to be classified as high surgical risk using the same criteria used for the HRR. Upon follow-up with the clinical sites, it was determined that some of the initially identified patients with moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR met the criteria for high surgical risk. Of these patients, some were not included due to; lack of Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval at the site, lack of informed consent and unable to be contacted. The remaining patients make up the CC group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • Evanston Northwestern Healthcare 2650 Ridge Ave., Walgreen Bldg, 3rd Floor, Cardiology
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • The Care Group Heart Center 10590 N. Meridian, Ste. 300

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Candidates for the high risk arm of the study must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:

  • Predicted procedural mortality risk calculated using the STS surgical risk calculator of ≥ 12% or in the judgment of the surgeon investigator the patient is considered a high risk surgical candidate due to the presence of one of the following indications:

    1. Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma
    2. Post-radiation mediastinum
    3. Previous mediastinitis
    4. Functional MR with EF<40
    5. Over 75 years old with EF<40
    6. Re-operation with patent grafts
    7. Two or more prior chest surgeries
    8. Hepatic cirrhosis i Three or more of the following STS high risk factors: i) Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL ii) Prior chest surgery iii) Age over 75 iv) EF<35
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Symptomatic moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) and in the judgment of the investigator intervention to reduce MR is likely to provide symptomatic relief for the patient. MR is determined as defined in Appendix A of the EVEREST II study protocol. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of ASA IV or lower.
  • The primary regurgitant jet originates from malcoaptation of the A2 and P2 scallops of the mitral valve.
  • Male or Female. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within seven (7) days before the procedure.
  • The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site.
  • The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
  • Transseptal catheterization is determined to be feasible by the treating physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

Candidates will be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are present:

  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction in the prior 2 weeks of the intended treatment (defined as: Q wave or non-Q wave infarction having creatine kinase (CK) enzymes ≥ two times (2X) the upper laboratory normal limit with the presence of a Creatine Kinase MB Isoenzyme (CKMB) elevated above the institution's upper limit of normal).
  • In the judgment of the Investigator, the femoral vein cannot accommodate a 24 F catheter or presence of ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
  • Ejection fraction < 20%, and/or end-systolic dimension > 60 mm as defined in Appendix A of the EVEREST II protocol.
  • Mitral valve orifice area < 4.0 cm2 as defined in Appendix A of the EVEREST II protocol.
  • If leaflet flail is present:

    1. Flail Width: the width of the flail segment is greater than or equal to 15 mm, as defined in Section 4.3 and Appendix A, or
    2. Flail Gap: the flail gap is greater than or equal to 10 mm, as defined in Section 4.3 and Appendix A.
  • If leaflet tethering is present:

    a). Coaptation Length: the vertical coaptation length is less than 2 mm, as defined in Section 4.3 and Appendix A.

  • Leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR. This may include:
  • Evidence of calcification in the grasping area of the A2 and/or P2 scallops
  • Presence of a significant cleft of A2 or P2 scallops
  • More than one anatomic criteria dimensionally near the exclusion limits
  • Bileaflet flail or severe bileaflet prolapse
  • Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure < 90 mmHg without after load reduction or cardiogenic shock or the need for inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump.
  • Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason.
  • Prior mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted mechanical prosthetic mitral valve.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic diseased (i.e. noncompliant, perforated).
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or subject will refuse blood transfusions.
  • Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, patients may enroll 2 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics). Patients must be free from infection prior to treatment. Any required dental work should be completed a minimum of 3 weeks prior to treatment.
  • Intravenous drug abuse or suspected inability to adhere to follow-up.
  • Patients in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated.
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to study or
  • In the judgment of the Investigator, patients in whom the presence of a permanent pacemaker or pacing leads would interfere with placement of the test device or the placement of the test device would disrupt the leads.
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints. [Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials].

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Risk Registry Arm
Includes patients with a predicted procedural mortality of 12% or higher. The high risk registry arm of the study is powered to show superiority of safety of treatment with the MitraClip compared to mitral valve surgery. The patients who are enrolled in this arm will undergo percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip implant.
Procedure/Surgery: Mitral valve repair or replacement surgery Repair or replacement of mitral valve
Other Names:
  • MitraClip
  • MitraClip Implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: 12 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
12 months
Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Freedom From Death
Time Frame: 12 months

Defined as all causes of death for the primary safety Major Adverse Event (MAE) Endpoint. Death is further divided into 2 categories:

A. Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following:

  1. Acute myocardial infarction.
  2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade.
  3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality.
  4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure.
  5. Death due to any complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.
  6. Any death for which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded.

B. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

12 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Death and Mitral Regurgitation (MR) >2+
Time Frame: 12 months
Kaplan-Meier estimated percentage of patients who are alive and have a mitral regurgitation severity grade of 2+ or less
12 months
Number of Participants With Clinical Measures of Benefit-New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 30 days

The major effectiveness endpoint is an assessment of multiple functional and structural measures of benefit including New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class.

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

30 days
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 12 months

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

12 months
Clinical Measures of Benefit-Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Short Form (SF) 36
Time Frame: 12 months
Standardized quality of life surveys allow physicians to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment methods and the physical and psychological benefits a patient is likely to receive from a particular treatment.In the EVEREST II HRR,the patients were asked to complete the SF-36 QOL survey at baseline, 30 days and 12 months. The physical & mental function were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score & Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. The PCS & MCS norms for 65-75 year olds are 44 and 52 respectively; and 31 & 46 for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients respectively. Each scale from the SF-36 is an algebraic sum of responses for all items in that scale.For ease of analysis each scale is then transformed to a 0-100 scale using a formula that converts the lowest & highest possible scores to 0 & 100 respectively.The scoring of the SF-36 indicates that 0% in a domain represents the poorest possible QoL & 100% indicates full QoL.
12 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 12 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
12 months
Left Ventricular (LV) Function - Internal Dimension
Time Frame: 12 months
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
12 months
Number of Patients With CHF Having Hospitalization During Discharge Through 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of patients with incidence of re-hospitalizations for CHF in the 12-months after the MitraClip implant procedure.
12 months
Number of CHF Events Leading to Hospitalizations During Discharge Through 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of re-hospitalizations for CHF in the 12-months after the MitraClip implant procedure.
12 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular (LV) Function - Internal Dimension
Time Frame: Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
Discharge or 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Time Frame: 30 days
Combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, reoperation for failed surgical repair or replacement, nonelective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood.
30 days
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, reoperation for failed surgical repair or replacement, nonelective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood.
12 months
Procedural Freedom From In-hospital MAE
Time Frame: 30 Days
Percutaneous Clip procedure or surgery with no occurrence of in-hospital MAE.
30 Days
Number of Participants Over 75 Years of Age With MAE
Time Frame: 30 days
Combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, reoperation for failed surgical repair or replacement, nonelective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood.
30 days
Number of Participants Over 75 Years of Age With MAE
Time Frame: 12 months
Combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, reoperation for failed surgical repair or replacement, nonelective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood.
12 months
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Vascular Complications
Time Frame: 30 days

Defined as the occurrence of any of the following resulting from the index procedure:

  • Hematoma at access site >6 cm;
  • Retroperitoneal hematoma;
  • Arterial-venous fistula;
  • Symptomatic peripheral ischemia/ nerve injury with clinical signs or symptoms lasting >24 hours;
  • Vascular surgical repair at catheter access sites;
  • Pulmonary embolism;
  • Ipsilateral deep vein thrombus; or
  • Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization.
30 days
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Vascular Complications
Time Frame: 12 months

Defined as the occurrence of any of the following resulting from the index procedure:

  • Hematoma at access site >6 cm;
  • Retroperitoneal hematoma;
  • Arterial-venous fistula;
  • Symptomatic peripheral ischemia/ nerve injury with clinical signs or symptoms lasting >24 hours;
  • Vascular surgical repair at catheter access sites;
  • Pulmonary embolism;
  • Ipsilateral deep vein thrombus; or
  • Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization.
12 months
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding Complications
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as procedure related bleeding that requires a transfusion of ≥2 units of blood and/or surgical intervention.
30 days
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding Complications
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as procedure related bleeding that requires a transfusion of ≥2 units of blood and/or surgical intervention.
12 months
Number of Participants With Non-cerebral Thromboembolism
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as any mural thrombus or thromboembolism in the vasculature (excluding central nervous system events) confirmed by standard clinical and laboratory testing and which requires intervention.
30 days
Number of Participants With Non-cerebral Thromboembolism
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as any mural thrombus or thromboembolism in the vasculature (excluding central nervous system events) confirmed by standard clinical and laboratory testing and which requires intervention.
12 months
Number of Participants With Thrombosis
Time Frame: 30 days
Evidence of formation of an independently moving thrombus on any part of the Clip or any commercially available implant used during surgery by echocardiography or fluoroscopy. If Clip is explanted or an autopsy is performed this diagnosis should be confirmed.
30 days
Number of Participants With Thrombosis
Time Frame: 12 months
Evidence of formation of an independently moving thrombus on any part of the Clip or any commercially available implant used during surgery by echocardiography or fluoroscopy. If Clip is explanted or an autopsy is performed this diagnosis should be confirmed.
12 months
Number of Participants With Hemolysis
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as new onset of anemia associated with laboratory evidence of red cell destruction. Diagnosed when plasma free hemoglobin is greater than 40 mg/dL on two measures within 24 hours or on one measure if intervention is initiated based on other clinical symptoms
30 days
Number of Participants With Hemolysis
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as new onset of anemia associated with laboratory evidence of red cell destruction. Diagnosed when plasma free hemoglobin is greater than 40 mg/dL on two measures within 24 hours or on one measure if intervention is initiated based on other clinical symptoms.
12 months
Number of Participants With Dysrhythmias
Time Frame: 30 days
Includes all new onset atrial fibrillation and heart block requiring placement of a permanent pacemaker.
30 days
Number of Participants With Dysrhythmias
Time Frame: 12 months
Includes all new onset atrial fibrillation and heart block requiring placement of a permanent pacemaker.
12 months
Number of Participants With Endocarditis
Time Frame: 30 days

Using Duke Criteria, endocarditis can be confirmed by:

Pathological criteria: Endocarditis is confirmed if microorganisms are identified by culture or histology in a vegetation, embolized vegetation, or an intracardiac abscess; or if pathological lesions are observed & histologically confirmed showing active endocarditis.

Clinical criteria: Endocarditis is confirmed by the presence of 2 major criteria, 1 major plus 3 minor criteria, or 5 minor criteria. Major criteria include persistently +ve blood cultures with the presence of typical organisms for endocarditis; persistent bacteremia; evidence of endocardial involvement with positive echocardiogram with signs of oscillating vegetation, abscesses, valve perforation, new partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve or new valvular regurgitation. Minor criteria include predisposing heart condition, fever, vascular phenomena, immunologic phenomena, & positive blood culture or echocardiogram not meeting major criteria.

30 days
Number of Participants With Endocarditis
Time Frame: 12 months

Using Duke Criteria, endocarditis can be confirmed by:

Pathological criteria: Endocarditis is confirmed if microorganisms are identified by culture or histology in a vegetation, embolized vegetation, or an intracardiac abscess; or if pathological lesions are observed & histologically confirmed showing active endocarditis.

Clinical criteria: Endocarditis is confirmed by the presence of 2 major criteria, 1 major plus 3 minor criteria, or 5 minor criteria.

Major criteria include persistently +ve blood cultures with the presence of typical organisms for endocarditis; persistent bacteremia; evidence of endocardial involvement with positive echocardiogram with signs of oscillating vegetation, abscesses, valve perforation, new partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve or new valvular regurgitation.

Minor criteria include predisposing heart condition, fever, vascular phenomena, immunologic phenomena, & positive blood culture or echocardiogram not meeting major criteria.

12 months
Number of Participants With Atrial Septal Defect (ASD)
Time Frame: 30 days
Occurrence of clinically significant ASD as a result of the procedure requiring intervention.
30 days
Number of Participants With Atrial Septal Defect (ASD)
Time Frame: 12 months
Occurrence of clinically significant ASD as a result of the procedure requiring intervention.
12 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis
Time Frame: 30 days
Mitral stenosis associated with a total mitral valve orifice area less than 1.5 cm2.
30 days
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral stenosis associated with a total mitral valve orifice area less than 1.5 cm2.
12 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis
Time Frame: 24 months
Mitral stenosis associated with a total mitral valve orifice area less than 1.5 cm2.
24 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis
Time Frame: 36 months
Mitral stenosis associated with a total mitral valve orifice area less than 1.5 cm2.
36 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis
Time Frame: 48 months
Mitral stenosis associated with a total mitral valve orifice area less than 1.5 cm2.
48 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 30 days
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
30 days
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
12 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 24 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
24 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 36 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
36 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 48 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
48 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Planimetry
Time Frame: 60 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
60 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 30 days
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
30 days
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
12 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 24 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
24 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 36 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
36 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 48 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
48 months
Mitral Valve Area: By Pressure Half-time
Time Frame: 60 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography.
60 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 30 days
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
30 days
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
12 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 24 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
24 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 36 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
36 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 48 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
48 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Planimetry
Time Frame: 60 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography by planimetry and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
60 months
Mitral Valve Area (MVA) Index: by Pressure-Half Time Formula
Time Frame: 30 days

Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to Body surface area (BSA).

[MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)]

30 days
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Pressure Half-time Formula
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
12 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Pressure Half-time Formula
Time Frame: 24 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
24 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Pressure Half-time Formula
Time Frame: 36 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
36 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Pressure Half-time Formula
Time Frame: 48 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
48 months
Mitral Valve Area Index : By Pressure Half-time Formula
Time Frame: 60 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography using the pressure half-time formula and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)].
60 months
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
30 days
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
12 months
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
24 months
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 36 months
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
36 months
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 48 months
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
48 months
Transvalvular Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame: 60 months
Defined as the mean pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by echocardiography.
60 months
Mitral Valve Index
Time Frame: 30 days
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)]
30 days
Mitral Valve Index
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral valve area as measured by core lab echocardiography and indexed to body surface area [MVA Index = MVA (cm^2)/BSA (m^2)]
12 months
Number of Participants With New Coumadin Use
Time Frame: 30 days
New onset use of Coumadin or warfarin to treat a potential thrombus on a defibrillator lead.
30 days
Number of Participants With New Coumadin Use
Time Frame: 6 months
New onset use of Coumadin or warfarin to treat a potential thrombus on a defibrillator lead.
6 months
Number of Participants With New Coumadin Use
Time Frame: 12 months
New onset use of Coumadin or warfarin to treat a potential thrombus on a defibrillator lead.
12 months
Number of Participants Discharged to a Nursing Home or Skilled Nursing Facility or Hospital
Time Frame: 30 Days
Discharge to a nursing home or skilled nursing facility following discharge from the hospital after definitive treatment.
30 Days
Post-procedure Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Length of Hospital Stay, assessed at 30 days
Defined as the number of days from the end of the procedure until the patient is discharged from the hospital. This does not include time in a nursing or skilled care facility.
Length of Hospital Stay, assessed at 30 days
Post-procedure Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/ Critical Care Unit (CCU) Time
Time Frame: Length of ICU/CCU stay, assessed at 30 Days
Number of hours patients are in an intensive care unit or step down unit before discharge or moving to a standard care unit.
Length of ICU/CCU stay, assessed at 30 Days
Number of Participants With Successful Clip Implant
Time Frame: 30 Days
Rate of successful delivery and deployment of Clip implants with echocardiographic evidence of leaflet approximation and retrieval of the investigational delivery catheter.
30 Days
Number of Participants With High Risk Procedural Success
Time Frame: 30 days
Successful implantation of the Clip (s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ of less at discharge or a 1 grade MR reduction at discharge accompanied by a 1 level reduction in NYHA.
30 days
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: Discharge or 30 days
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
Discharge or 30 days
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: 12 months
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
12 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: 24 months
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
24 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: 36 months
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
36 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: 48 months
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
48 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity
Time Frame: 60 months
MR Severity: Site-assessed mitral regurgitation severity using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 1+ to 2+ is mild-to-moderate, 2+ to 3+ is moderate to moderate-to-Severe, 3+ is moderate-to-severe, 3+ to 4+ is moderate-to-severe to severe, 4+ is severe.
60 months
Number of Participants With Treatment Durability
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as the proportion of Acute Procedural Success patients with MR severity grade of 2+ or less that have not required surgery for valve dysfunction.
12 months
Number of Participants With Treatment Durability
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as the proportion of Acute Procedural Success patients with MR severity grade of 2+ or less that have not required surgery for valve dysfunction.
24 months
Number of Participants With Clinical Durability
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients who have an acute reduction in MR severity of at least one grade (as measured by the discharge echocardiogram) that have not required surgery for valve dysfunction and meet either of the following: 1) MR severity grade of 2+ or less or 2) a one grade reduction in MR severity compared to baseline accompanied by at least a one level reduction in NYHA.
12 months
Number of Participants With Clinical Durability
Time Frame: 24 months
Proportion of patients who have an acute reduction in MR severity of at least one grade (as measured by the discharge echocardiogram) that have not required surgery for valve dysfunction and meet either of the following: 1) MR severity grade of 2+ or less or 2) a one grade reduction in MR severity compared to baseline accompanied by at least a one level reduction in NYHA.
24 months
Number of Participants With Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Clinical Measures of Benefit-New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 24 months

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

24 months
Number of Participants With Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Clinical Measures of Benefit-New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 36 months

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

36 months
Number of Participants With Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Clinical Measures of Benefit-New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 48 months

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

48 months
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time Frame: 60 months

Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.

Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

60 months
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV).
Time Frame: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
24 months
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV).
Time Frame: 36 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
36 months
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV).
Time Frame: 48 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
48 months
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV).
Time Frame: 60 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
60 months
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV).
Time Frame: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
24 months
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV).
Time Frame: 36 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
36 months
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV).
Time Frame: 48 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
48 months
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV).
Time Frame: 60 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
60 months
Left Ventricular Measurement: Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd), Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs)
Time Frame: 24 months
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
24 months
Left Ventricular Measurement: Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd), Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs)
Time Frame: 36 months
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
36 months
Left Ventricular Measurement: Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd), Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs)
Time Frame: 48 months
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
48 months
Left Ventricular Measurement: Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd), Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs)
Time Frame: 60 months
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in systole (LVIDs) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
60 months
Number of Days Re-hospitalized for CHF
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as the number of days hospitalized for CHF in the 12-months prior to the Clip implant procedure date compared to the number of days re-hospitalized for CHF in the 12-months after Clip implant.
12 months
Number of Hospital Re-Admissions for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as the number of hospital admissions (i.e. events) for which the primary diagnosis for hospitalization is congestive heart failure, in the 12-months post-discharge following the MitraClip procedure.
12 months
Regurgitant Volume
Time Frame: 30 days
Regurgitant volume as measured by the core echocardiographic laboratory at follow-up.
30 days
Regurgitant Volume
Time Frame: 12 months
Regurgitant volume as measured by the core echocardiographic laboratory at follow-up.
12 months
Regurgitant Volume
Time Frame: 24 months
Regurgitant volume as measured by the core echocardiographic laboratory at follow-up.
24 months
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time Frame: 30 days
RF is defined as the percentage of the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume that regurgitates into the left atrium.
30 days
Regurgitant Fraction
Time Frame: 12 months
RF is defined as the percentage of the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume that regurgitates into the left atrium.
12 months
Regurgitant Fraction
Time Frame: 24 months
RF is defined as the percentage of the left ventricular (LV) stroke volume that regurgitates into the left atrium.
24 months
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 30 Days
CO is defined as the volume of blood pumped by the left ventricle per unit time (L/min).
30 Days
Cardiac Output
Time Frame: 12 months
CO is defined as the volume of blood pumped by the left ventricle per unit time (L/min)
12 months
Cardiac Output
Time Frame: 24 months
CO is defined as the volume of blood pumped by the left ventricle per unit time (L/min)
24 months
Cardiac Index
Time Frame: 30 Days
Cardiac index (cardiac output divided by body surface area) as measured by core lab echocardiography.
30 Days
Cardiac Index
Time Frame: 12 months
Cardiac index (cardiac output divided by body surface area) as measured by core lab echocardiography.
12 months
Cardiac Index
Time Frame: 24 months
Cardiac index (cardiac output divided by body surface area) as measured by core lab echocardiography.
24 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
Discharge or 30 days
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 12 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
12 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 24 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
24 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 36 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
36 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 48 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
48 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 60 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as determined by the core echocardiography laboratory.
60 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
12 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 24 months
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
24 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 36 months
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
36 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 48 months
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
48 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 60 months
Percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
60 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Repair Success
Time Frame: 12 months
Mitral Valve Repair Success defined as freedom from mitral valve replacement surgery for valve dysfunction, death, re-operation and MR > 2+ at 12 months.
12 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Repair Success
Time Frame: 24 months
Freedom from mitral valve replacement surgery for Valve Dysfunction, death, re-operation, and MR > 2+.
24 months
Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Death
Time Frame: 24 months

Defined as all causes of death for the primary safety Major Adverse Event (MAE) Endpoint. Death is further divided into 2 categories:

A. Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following:

  1. Acute myocardial infarction.
  2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade.
  3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality.
  4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure.
  5. Death due to any complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.
  6. Any death for which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded.

B. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

24 months
Percentage of Participants With Composite Functional and Structural Measures - Freedom From Death and MR >2+
Time Frame: 24 months
Kaplan-Meier estimated proportion of patients who are alive and have a mitral regurgitation severity grade of 2+ or less.
24 months
Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment
Time Frame: 0 to 12 months

Device embolization is defined as bilateral Clip detachment resulting in Clip embolization. Reasons for Clip embolization include leaflet tearing, Clip unlocking, Clip fracture or inadequate Clip placement (i.e., malposition). Not included are any fractures or other failures of the Clip that do not result in Clip detachment from both leaflets.

A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device.

0 to 12 months
Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment
Time Frame: 24 months

Device embolization is defined as bilateral Clip detachment resulting in Clip embolization. Reasons for Clip embolization include leaflet tearing, Clip unlocking, Clip fracture or inadequate Clip placement (i.e., malposition). Not included are any fractures or other failures of the Clip that do not result in Clip detachment from both leaflets.

A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device.

24 months
Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment
Time Frame: 48 months

Device embolization is defined as bilateral Clip detachment resulting in Clip embolization. Reasons for Clip embolization include leaflet tearing, Clip unlocking, Clip fracture or inadequate Clip placement (i.e., malposition). Not included are any fractures or other failures of the Clip that do not result in Clip detachment from both leaflets.

A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device.

48 months
Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment
Time Frame: 36 months

Device embolization is defined as bilateral Clip detachment resulting in Clip embolization. Reasons for Clip embolization include leaflet tearing, Clip unlocking, Clip fracture or inadequate Clip placement (i.e., malposition). Not included are any fractures or other failures of the Clip that do not result in Clip detachment from both leaflets.

A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device.

36 months
Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment
Time Frame: 60 months

Device embolization is defined as bilateral Clip detachment resulting in Clip embolization. Reasons for Clip embolization include leaflet tearing, Clip unlocking, Clip fracture or inadequate Clip placement (i.e., malposition). Not included are any fractures or other failures of the Clip that do not result in Clip detachment from both leaflets.

A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device.

60 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Surgery Post-MitraClip Procedure
Time Frame: 60 months
Number of patients who underwent surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure.
60 months
Number of Participants With Second MitraClip Device Implanted
Time Frame: 0 to 5 years
It is a summary of re-interventions to place an additional MitraClip Device.
0 to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality and Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 12 months
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
12 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality and Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 24 months
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
24 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality and Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 36 months
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
36 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality and Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 48 months
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
48 months
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality and Mitral Valve Surgery
Time Frame: 60 months
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and did not undergo surgical mitral valve repair or replacement after the index MitraClip procedure
60 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Replacement
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as how often patients receiving surgery required replacement of the mitral valve.
12 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Replacement
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as how often patients receiving surgery required replacement of the mitral valve.
24 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Replacement
Time Frame: 36 months
Defined as how often patients receiving surgery required replacement of the mitral valve.
36 months
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Replacement
Time Frame: 48 months
Defined as how often patients receiving surgery required replacement of the mitral valve.
48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ted Feldman, M.D., Northshore University Healthsystem
  • Principal Investigator: Donald G Glower Jr.,, M.D., Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip implant

3
Subscribe