Variable Approaches of Intradiscal O3-O2 Injection

December 7, 2017 updated by: Emad Zarief , MD, Assiut University

Variable Approaches of Intradiscal O3-O2 Injection for Management of Low Back Pain: Could it Make a Difference? a Prospective Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cost Intradiscal injection of ozone-oxygen mixture (O3-O2) which offers a rapid onset amelioration of symptoms, with a sustained duration pain relief in low back pain.

Does change of injection approach make a difference?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low back pain (LBP) mostly is induced by disc herniation (DH), or degeneration and has a burden upon social and economic aspects of life. Medical and or surgical interventions have been used to resolve this problem, but one of the newly introduced is the minimally invasive low cost Intradiscal injection of ozone-oxygen mixture (O3-O2) which offers a rapid onset amelioration of symptoms, with a sustained duration pain relief.

A lot of injection approaches are available, but which offers the best results, is the question.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • Emad Zarief Kamel Said

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • radicular leg pain
  • low back pain
  • non-responsive to conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
  • infection at injection site
  • coagulopathy
  • uncontrolled or degenerative spine disease
  • pregnancy
  • multilevel disk involvement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: A: Classic approach

Intradiscal O3 injection through classic postrolateral extraarticular percutaneous approach.

The participants will receive 10 ml of ozone oxygen mixture 30 ug O3/ml O2. The ozone-oxygen mixture was produced in real-time by a medical ozone generator (Ozonline E 80, Medica srl, Bologna Italy).

Receive 10 ml of ozone oxygen mixture 30 ug O3/ml O2 through the classic postrolateral extraarticular percutaneous approach
Active Comparator: B: Transforaminal approach (Yess approach )

Participants will receive 10 ml of ozone oxygen mixture 30 ug O3/ml O2 through postrolateral transforaminal approach (Yess approach).

The ozone-oxygen mixture was produced in real-time by a medical ozone generator (Ozonline E 80, Medica srl, Bologna Italy).

Group B receive 10 ml of ozone oxygen mixture 30 ug O3/ml O2 through postrolateral transforaminal approach (Yess approach ).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of pain alleviation (visual analog scale)
Time Frame: one year
assessing visual analog scale (VAS)
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesia reduction (percent)
Time Frame: one year
the percent of analgesia reduction
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Abdelraheem Alawaamy, MD, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00009903

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Subscribe