Outpatient and Home Pelvic Floor Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence

February 6, 2018 updated by: Fatima Fitz, Federal University of São Paulo

Outpatient Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Versus Home Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to compare the effect of outpatient pelvic floor muscle training versus home pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The hypothesis of this study is that home pelvic floor muscle training is as effective as outpatient pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Success with the pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is hampered by non-adherence, which is related to factors such as inability to contract the pelvic floor muscles and lack of motivation. Thus under supervision by a physiotherapist (outpatient training), PFMT has the potential of improving adherence to training and has been demonstrated to be more effective when compared to unsupervised PFMT (home training). The objective of this study is to compare the effect of outpatient pelvic floor muscle training versus home pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. This is a randomized controlled trial and which will be conducted at the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery at the Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. As a primary endpoint, the standardized volume test pad (250 mL) will be used. To assert that one of the groups (home PFMT or outpatient PFMT) is superior to the other, it will be necessary to find 38.5% more patients cured when the groups are compared. Secondary outcome measures will be used, assessment of the pelvic floor muscles function, urinary symptoms, quality of life and subjective cure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05311030
        • Fátima Faní Fitz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

SUI and mixed urinary incontinence with predominant symptoms of SUI with ≥ 2 g of leakage measured by pad test

Exclusion Criteria:

younger than 18 years old chronic degenerative diseases pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage I by POP-Q neurologic or psychiatric diseases inability to contract PFMs previously undergone pelvic floor re-education programs and/or previous pelvic floor surgeries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home pelvic floor muscle training
Patients will perform strength training of the pelvic floor muscles daily at home. The training protocol consists of three sets of 30 slow contractions (type I muscle fibers), with maintenance contraction according to the initial evaluation, followed by three rapid contractions (type II muscle fibers) after each slow contraction. The protocol will account for 90 contractions of the pelvic floor muscles per day. At the end of one month, the patients will return for consultation, in which the MAP evaluation and training progression will be performed.
Patients will perform pelvic floor exercises at home.
Sham Comparator: Outpatient pelvic floor muscle training
The patients will perform 24 outpatient sessions of pelvic floor muscle strength training and home training. The training protocol consists of three sets of 30 slow contractions (type I muscle fibers), with maintenance contraction according to the initial evaluation, followed by three rapid contractions (type II muscle fibers) after each slow contraction. The protocol will account for 90 contractions of the pelvic floor muscles per day. At the end of one month, the patients will perform the evaluation of the MAP and progression of the training.
Patients will perform pelvic floor exercises in the outpatient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pad test
Time Frame: Baseline, after 3 months of treatment
To quantify the severity of SUI and as the tool to estimate objective cure rate
Baseline, after 3 months of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 7-Day Voiding Diary
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
To assess the loss efforts
Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
Change in pelvic floor muscle function (Oxford Grading Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
To assess the function of the pelvic floor muscle
Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
Change in Incontinence Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (I-QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
To quantify the impact of SUI on quality of life
Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
Subjective cure of SUI ("satisfied" or "dissatisfied")
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 months of treatment
To evaluate the patient satisfaction with treatment
Baseline and after 3 months of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rodrigo A Castro, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Clinical Trials on Exercises of the pelvic floor muscle at home

Subscribe