Disease Perception and Recovery From Low Back Pain

May 10, 2019 updated by: Central Jutland Regional Hospital

A Prospective Cohort Study With 52 Weeks Follow-up Investigating the Influence of Disease Perception on Functional Outcome Among Patients Referred From General Practice to Secondary Care for Treatment of Low Back Pain.

The main purpose of the study is to investigate the importance of patients' beliefs regarding staying active despite low back pain, among patients referred from general practice to secondary care treatment in Denmark. It is hypothesised that patients believing that staying active will help them recover will have higher odds of a 30%-improvement in The Roland Morris Disability score after 52 weeks compared to patients disagreeing that staying active will lead to better recovery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: According to international guidelines on low back pain (LBP), advice to stay active should be provided from healthcare professionals to all patients with LBP. However, provision of advice to stay active is reported to be diverse. Some primary care healthcare professionals believe that avoidance of activities and work will help the patient recover. Consequently some patients are not receiving optimal advice to stay active and may think that inactivity will help them and consequently achieve less favourable treatment outcomes. Thus, changing patients' beliefs are considered the key decisive factor to change actual behaviour, and by that improve the functional ability of the patients. This should reduce primary health care use and reduce referrals to the more expensive treatments in secondary care. The effect of patients' beliefs on their functional outcomes has to our knowledge never been studied in a population of patients with LBP being referred from primary care to secondary care treatment.

Materials and Methods:

This is a prospective cohort study. Data is collected from a consecutive series of 800 adult patients (18+), with low back pain as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint, referred from general practices in Central Denmark Region to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital. Patients will be excluded in case of spinal fractures or malignancy.

All patients seen at the Spine Centre receive a digital letter with a link to an online questionnaire to be completed approximately one week before their appointment at the Spine Centre. The questionnaire contains questions about their back pain history, present pain (Low Back Pain Rating Scale), disability (Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire), quality of life (EQ-5D), fear-avoidance questions (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire), STarT Back Screening tool, questions on average level of physical activity, beliefs about physical activity in relation to back pain, advice received from health professionals about staying active, and questions about employment and housing situation. For those accepting participation the same questionnaire is forwarded by email 52 weeks after the initial visit at the Spine Center.

Expected outcome and perspective: This study will bring knowledge about the associations between patient's disease perceptions and beliefs about staying active despite pain and their functional improvement. Furthermore, the study will clarify to what extent patients perceive to have been given advice to stay active by a primary care health professional. Although this study does not explain why some patients do not have guideline concordant beliefs, it will help inform health care professionals in primary care about the possible potential of an increased primary care attention towards the recommendation of staying active when patients have LBP.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

828

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
        • Diagnostic Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of 800 consecutive low back pain patients referred from primary care to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain (with or without sciatica) as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint
  • 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal fractures
  • Malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Low back pain patients
Cohort of 800 consecutive low back pain patients, 18 years +, who have been referred from general practice to the secondary sector for further examination and MR scan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Validated questionnaire containing 23 questions on self-reported disability due to low back pain
Change from baseline to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Low Back Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Validated questionnaire containing 6 questions on self-reported back and leg pain intensity
Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Change in EuroQol 5 Dimensions (quality of life)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Validated questionnaire containing 5 questions on self-reported generic quality of life
Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Change in proportion on sick leave
Time Frame: Change in proportion of patients on sick leave from baseline to 52 weeks
Self-reported average weekly sick leave during the past 4 weeks
Change in proportion of patients on sick leave from baseline to 52 weeks
Received consultations in primary sector after referral to secondary care
Time Frame: Measured at 52 week follow-up
Any consultations with GP, physiotherapist or chiropractors in the year following referral to secondary care due to low back pain (YES/NO)
Measured at 52 week follow-up
Change in Major Depression Inventory (depression)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 52 weeks
Validated questionnaire containing 10 questions regarding symptoms of depression
Change from baseline to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nanna Rolving, PhD, Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6300004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Subscribe