Evaluation of the Inflammatory and Healing Profile After Root Coverage With Emdogain®

February 16, 2017 updated by: Alexandra Tavares Dias, Rio de Janeiro State University
The purpose of this study was the evaluation of inflammatory and healing profile after root coverage using of Enamel Matrix Derivative. 16 volunteers were selected and submitted to root coverage surgery with subepithelial connective tissue graft, with and without enamel matrix derivative. The patient screening was based in the following inclusion criteria: bilateral recessions in maxillary anterior homologous teeth with aesthetical complaining ou hypersensitivity, non-smokers, healthy and no use of any medication that compromises periodontal health or healing. The split-mouth randomized model was followed in relation to test and control sites. The following clinical parameters were analyzed at baseline and 6-month post-surgery: recession height, recession width, width of keratinized tissue, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival thickness. In addition to the surgical analysis, evaluations of the following inflammatory markers were performed: IL-1β, IL -1RA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, EOTAXIN, FGF, GCSF, GMCSF, IFN-y, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP 1a, PDGF-bb, MIP 1b, RANTES, TNF-α e VEGF. These evaluations were performed at baseline, 7 and 14 days after surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

29 years to 53 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral gingival recessions in homologous teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers;
  • Systemic diseases;
  • Drugs affecting periodontal health/healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enamel Matrix Derivative
Microsurgery for root coverage associated with Enamel Matrix Derivative
Microsurgery technique for root coverage adapted for macrosurgery associated to Enamel Matrix Derivative
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Microsurgery for root coverage associated with a Placebo comparator
Microsurgery technique for root coverage adapted for macrosurgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-surgical pain
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Questionnaire with a Visual Analog Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
7 days after surgery
Root Coverage Score
Time Frame: 180 days after surgery
A score including root coverage, marginal gingival tissue contour, mucogingival junction alignment, soft tissue texture and gingival colour according to Cairo et al. (1999)
180 days after surgery
Post-surgical Clinical Analysis
Time Frame: 180 days after surgery
Analysis of recession height, recession width, width of keratinized tissue, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival thickness.
180 days after surgery
Changes in Gingival Fluid Biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 and 14 days after surgery
Analysis for IL-1β, IL -1RA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, EOTAXIN, FGF, GCSF, GMCSF, IFN-y, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP 1a, PDGF-bb, MIP 1b, RANTES, TNF-α e VEGF by Luminex
Baseline, 7 and 14 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on Microsurgery technique for root coverage associated to EMD

3
Subscribe