Choosing the Technique for First Abdominal Entry in Laparoscopy

March 14, 2017 updated by: Fatih Basak, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Choosing the Technique for First Abdominal Entry in Laparoscopy: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.

Several techniques for initial abdominal entry in laparoscopy have been introduced in literature. Various guidelines and recommendations are available on this subject, however, compliance to these are controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rationale and the process of decision making for first entry technique in laparoscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Several methods, i.e., the Veress needle, open approach using the Hasson trocar and direct trocar insertion without insufflation have been described for initial abdominal entry in laparoscopy. On the other hand, relatively new approaches, e.g., the optical or radially expanding trocars did not become common yet. Despite the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, serious complications can be encountered during the initial entry. Development of a complication, e.g., major vascular and intestinal injury, would affect the outcome of the operation and it may result in conversion to the open approach. Because of low incidence of these complications, it is impossible to show any superiority of one approach to another.

In this study, we aimed to analyze the rationale and the process of decision making of a surgeon about initial abdominal entry technique for laparoscopy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

263

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ümraniye
      • Istanbul, Ümraniye, Turkey, 34000
        • Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Close-ended survey questions were formed and sent to general surgeons by e-mail containing the web address of the survey.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General Surgeons who approve to participate to the study will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical residents will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Survey
Close-ended survey questions were formed and will be sent to general surgeons by e-mail containing the web address of the survey.
Close-ended survey will be performed to the participants. The survey consisted of 18 questions (Appendix). The first six questions (#1-6) were related with respondent's demographical and educational data and experiences of surgical and laparoscopic practices. There were five questions to determine preferred technique for first entry (#7-11), three questions for complications (#12-14), and remaining four questions for safety maneuvers (#15-18).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rationale of choice in decision-making of first abdominal trocar entry method.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The survey will be performed to participant general surgeons to evaluate rationale of choice in decision-making of first abdominal trocar entry method.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fatih Basak, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Rationale-Trocar

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision-Making

Clinical Trials on Survey

Subscribe