Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Pressure in the Prone and Lateral Decubitus Position

March 5, 2018 updated by: Ji Hee Hong, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Comparison of Extent of Epidurography and Thoracic Epidural Pressure in the Prone and Lateral Decubitus Position

It is reported that the distribution of contrast medium had an obvious correlation with the extent of sensory analgesia after injection of LA. Our previous study showed that different posture (prone vs. lateral decubitus) resulted in different degree of contrast medium spread. We supposed that differences of epidural pressure between diverse postures might be one factor contributing those differences of epidurography.

This study was designed to compare the epidural pressure and extent of spread of epidurography between prone and lateral decubitus position

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this potential complication.

The spread of local anesthetics is influenced by various factors including volume, location of needle insertion, speed of injection, patient position, age, weight and height. However, there are few studies about the effect of different patient position affeting the epidural pressure and the extent of spread of contrast medium during thoracic epidural catheterization.

Studies of lumbar epidural blockade have shown that lateral position can produce 0-3 segment more to the dependent position compared to the supine position. When the same amount of local anesthetic was injected in supine of sitting position, the most cephalad level of spread was indifferent. Recent studies showed that neck flexion demonstrated significant cephalad spread of contrast dye in high thoracic epidural blockade. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the changes of epidural pressure with extent of spread of contrast medium between different posture

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lung cancer
  • liver cancer
  • stomach cancer
  • pancreas cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coagulopathy
  • infection
  • previous spine fusion at thoracic level

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: supine position
Active Comparator: supine position thoracic epidural catheterization with supine position
thoracic epidural catheterization thoracic epidural catheterization for the management of postoperative pain
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: flexed lateral position
Active Comparator: flexed lateral position thoracic epidural catheterization with flexed lateral position
thoracic epidural catheterization thoracic epidural catheterization for the management of postoperative pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural pressure
Time Frame: 15 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Epidural pressure (mmHg) measurement using pressure transducer between different posture
15 minutes after the completion of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast dye assessment
Time Frame: 5 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Number of segment convered by contrast dye assessed through fluoroscopic image
5 minutes after the completion of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Epidural Injection

Clinical Trials on thoracic epidural catheterization

3
Subscribe