- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03161730
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice
January 8, 2018 updated by: Jong Yeop Kim, Ajou University School of Medicine
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in a Normal and Cervical Immobilized Manikin by Novice
The purpose of this study is to compare the intubation time and success rate between videolaryngoscopes (McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope) and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation in a normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice airway managers.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
35
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 443-721
- Jong Yeop Kim
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 56 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- nurse without experience in tracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal to consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: McGrath videolaryngoscopy
Participants attempt to perform three intubation using McGrath videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
|
Participants perform three intubation attempts using McGrath videolaryngoscope in the normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice
|
|
Experimental: Pentax videolaryngoscopy
Participants attempt to perform three intubation using Pentax videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
|
Participants perform three intubation attempts using Pentax Airway Scope in the normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice
|
|
Active Comparator: Macintosh laryngoscopy
Participants attempt to perform three intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
|
Participants perform three intubation attempts using Macintosh laryngoscope in the normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
intubation time
Time Frame: within 2 min after insertion of laryngoscope into manikin's mouth
|
time the blade passed the manikin's tooth until lung expansion with resuscitation bag
|
within 2 min after insertion of laryngoscope into manikin's mouth
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 25, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 21, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
December 21, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 18, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
May 22, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 10, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 8, 2018
Last Verified
January 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- AJIRB-MED-DE4-17-026
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Complication | Intubation Intraesophageal | Intubation Depth | Intubation, Nasogastric | Intubation Times
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRecruitingIntubation | Intubation, Endotracheal | Intubation Complications | Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation | Delayed Sequence IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
NHS LothianMedtronicNot yet recruitingIntubation Complications | Intubation Skill | Intubation With Uncuffed Endotracheal TubeUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, India, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation, Nasotracheal IntubationTaiwan
Clinical Trials on McGrath videolaryngoscopy
-
Université de MontréalCentre d'Apprentissage des Habiletés Cliniques (CAAHC); Laboratoire d'anatomie...CompletedSimulation | Cadaver | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Hemoptysis | LaryngoscopeCanada
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedIntraocular PressureTurkey
-
The Cleveland ClinicMedtronicCompletedMorbid ObesityUnited States
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedAnesthesia, EndotrachealKorea, Republic of
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedAnesthesia, EndotrachealKorea, Republic of
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or FailedItaly
-
Manuel Ángel Gómez-RíosCompletedNasotracheal IntubationSpain
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalCompleted