Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group B ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

July 6, 2017 updated by: Ahmed Tarek, Cairo University

Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

20 patients were selected requiring implant placement and divided randomly into two groups (10 in each group)

  • for the study group, starter drill is used to locate the point of insertion as planned then pilot drill is also used to the full desired working length after that all other sequential drills are used at a low speed (50-70 rpm) without irrigation .
  • In the study group: implant will be inserted in the low speed osteotomy site.
  • In the control group: implants will be inserted in the conventional prepared osteotomy site.
  • For both groups there is no surgical guide used.
  • The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
  • The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients restoring missing maxillary teeth with implant placement.
  • Both sexes.
  • Age: 25-45
  • Mesio-distal dimensions: Not less than 6 mm
  • Bone Height: Not less than 12 mm
  • Bucco-lingual dimensions: Not less than 8mm
  • All measures will be assessed using CBCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sites needing bone grafting or augmentation.
  • Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
  • Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biologic drilling
drilling at low speed
Procedure: Drilling at low speed
Active Comparator: conventional drilling
drilling at conventional or high speed
Procedure: Drilling at conventional or high speed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
crestal bone loss
Time Frame: 6 month
measurement from radiographic analysis using digital periapical x-ray
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient morbidity after procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
pain value on pain scale
1 day
Implant stability value
Time Frame: 3 month
resonance frequency analysis using osstell
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Cebc.cairoun

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Resorption

Clinical Trials on Drilling at low speed

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Poland

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe