KRX-0502 (Ferric Citrate) in Subjects With NDD-CKD and IDA (The COMPASS Trial) (COMPASS)

March 10, 2021 updated by: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals

Study of KRX-0502 (Ferric Citrate) Dose Regimens in Subjects With Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease and Iron-Deficiency Anemia

The objectives of this study are to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of KRX-0502 in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in adult subjects with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 4, 48-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical study comprised of 2 periods: a 24-week Dose Titration Period, followed by a 24-week Dose Maintenance Period. The study will consist of 12 scheduled clinic visits over a period of 48 weeks and additional visits as needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

206

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension center: AKDHC Medical Research Services, LLC
    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91910
        • California Institute of Renal Research
      • El Centro, California, United States, 92243
        • California Institute of Renal Research
      • Poway, California, United States, 92064
        • California Institute of Renal Research
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
        • Denver Nephrologists, P.C.
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
        • Miami Kidney Group
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33150
        • Kidney and Hypertension Specialists of Miami, P.A.
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30904
        • Southeastern Clinical Research Institute, LLC
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
        • Renal Associates, LLC
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60643
        • Research by Design, LLC
    • Mississippi
      • Gulfport, Mississippi, United States, 39501
        • South Mississippi Medical Research, LLC
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Clinical Research Consultants
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89511
        • Sierra Nevada Nephrology Consultants
    • New Jersey
      • Eatontown, New Jersey, United States, 07724
        • Hypertension and Nephrology Association
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Division of Kidney/HTN Research
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28801
        • Mountain Kidney & Hypertension Associates
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • Metrolina Nephrology Associates, PA
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Eastern Nephrology Associates
      • Jacksonville, North Carolina, United States, 28546
        • Southeastern Nephrology Associates
      • New Bern, North Carolina, United States, 28562
        • Eastern Nephrology Associates
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
        • Southeastern Nephrology
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29203
        • Columbia Nephrology Associates, PA
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • South Carolina Nephrology & Hypertension Center, Inc
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37205
        • Nephrology Associates, P.C.
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
        • Research Management, Inc.
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78751
        • Research Management, Inc.
      • Lufkin, Texas, United States, 75904
        • P & I Clinical Research, LLC
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78212
        • Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥20 mL/min and <60 mL/min
  • Hgb ≥8.5 g/dL and ≤11.5 g/dL
  • Serum ferritin ≤500 ng/mL and transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≤25%
  • Serum intact parathyroid hormone ≤600 pg/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serum phosphate <3.0 mg/dL
  • Intravenous (IV) iron administered within 4 weeks prior to Screening
  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) administered within 4 weeks prior to Screening
  • Blood transfusion within 4 weeks prior to Screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
KRX-0502 1 tablet thrice daily (TID) with meals
Oral ferric citrate with meals
Other Names:
  • ferric citrate
Experimental: Group 2
KRX-0502 2 tablets twice daily (BID) with the largest 2 daily meals
Oral ferric citrate with meals
Other Names:
  • ferric citrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from a mixed model of repeated measures (MMRM), including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Time From Randomization to the First Increase From Baseline Hgb of at Least 0.5 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) During the Dose Titration Period
Time Frame: from Randomization to Week 24
The Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survival function of time from randomization to the first increase from Baseline Hgb of at least 0.5 g/dL for each of the two starting dose treatment groups were obtained.
from Randomization to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in TSAT at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Ferritin at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in Ferritin at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphate at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphate at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using a common slope analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in iPTH at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in C-terminal Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in C-terminal FGF23 at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Intact Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using a common slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in Intact Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline Scores for the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Adapted for Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) at Week 24: Work-associated Measures
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline Scores for the WPAI Questionnaire Adapted for Anemia Associated With CKD at Week 48: Work-associated Measures
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline Scores for the WPAI Questionnaire Adapted for Anemia Associated With CKD at Week 24: Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline Scores for the WPAI Questionnaire Adapted for Anemia Associated With CKD at Week 48: Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Participants were asked to respond to 13 statements (as they apply to the last 7 days) that other people with the same illness said are important with one of the following: 0, not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, somewhat; 3, quite a bit; 4, very much. All individual items were summed to create a single fatigue score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Baseline; Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Participants were asked to respond to 13 statements (as they apply to the last 7 days) that other people with the same illness said are important with one of the following: 0, not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, somewhat; 3, quite a bit; 4, very much. All individual items were summed to create a single fatigue score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Baseline; Week 48
Number of Hospitalizations for Participants Who Entered the Dose Maintenance Period
Time Frame: up to Week 48
A hospitalization is defined as admission to the hospital.
up to Week 48
Duration of Hospitalizations for Participants Who Entered the Dose Maintenance Period
Time Frame: up to Week 48
A hospitalization is defined as admission to the hospital.
up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) for Participants Who Entered the Dose Maintenance Period
Time Frame: up to Week 48
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that began after the first administration of study medication or pre-existing conditions that worsened after the first dose of study medication.
up to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Director, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on KRX-0502

3
Subscribe