Evaluation of the Performance of a Rapid Pregnancy Diagnostic Test.

April 13, 2018 updated by: Rennes University Hospital
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a rapid pregnancy diagnostic test to improve the medical care of patients in emergency room.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The most current gynecological consultations in emergency unit first lead to a pregnancy diagnostic test. The gold standard used is the diagnostic test based on determination of the β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration. But this assay need time and expect women to wait for hours. A 5-minutes pregnancy diagnostic test has been developed in France. A 62-patients study showed that results obtained with the rapid test were correlated with results obtained with the test based on determination of the β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the 5-minutes pregnancy diagnostic test realized in emergency room, in comparison with the blood determination of the β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration which is only tested in medical laboratory. A little amount of total blood sample used for gold standard test will be used to assess sensibility, specificity, positive or negative predictive values of the rapid pregnancy diagnostic test.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Rennes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult women who come in emergency unit to consult for metrorrhagia and/or pelvic pains and who need a diagnostic test using the β-human chorionic gonadotropin blood test.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult women who are in genital activity
  • Women who are in emergency unit to consult for metrorrhagia and/or pelvic pains.
  • Lack of intrauterine gestational sac determined using endo-vaginal ultrasound
  • Women who need a diagnostic test using the β-human chorionic gonadotropin blood test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pregnancy diagnostic assessed using the β-human chorionic gonadotropin blood test.
  • Patients included in an ovarian stimulation program for infertility
  • Ectopic gestational sac in which there is an embryo with a cardiac activity determined with ultrasound.
  • Patient objecting to participate in the study
  • Minor
  • Persons subject to major legal protection (safeguarding justice, guardianship, trusteeship), persons deprived of liberty.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of diagnostic of pregnancy with the rapid pregnancy diagnostic test in comparison with the number of diagnostic of pregnancy with the blood determination of the β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration.
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of diagnostic of pregnancy with the rapid pregnancy diagnostic test in comparison with the number of diagnostic of pregnancy with the blood determination of the β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Waiting time in emergency unit for patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Waiting time in emergency unit for patients
6 months
Amount of blood tests avoided with the rapid pregnancy diagnostic test
Time Frame: 6 months
Amount of blood tests avoided with the rapid pregnancy diagnostic test
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Lavoué, Pr, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergencies

3
Subscribe