Effect of Mini Implants Supported Over Dentures Versus Conventional Implant After Bone Expansion

October 26, 2017 updated by: Osama Ahmed Aboelfetooh, Cairo University

Effect of Mini Implants Supported Over Dentures Versus Conventional Implant After Bone Expansion in Thin Mandibular Ridge on Patient Satisfaction:

The better form of ridge will provide using wider implants that can have better abilities to with stand forces and to prevent alveolar bone loss as much as possible. Ridge expansion gained some popularity due to easiness compared to any other procedure that can gain bone. However, this treatment modality needs to be evaluated as compared to Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) over denture in thin mandibular ridge.

In mandibular edentulous patients having thin ridge, does the mini implant supported over denture, compared to the conventional implant supported over denture after bone expansion affect bone height around implants?

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PICO

P: Completely edentulous Patients.

I: Mandibular overdenture supported by mini dental implant.

C: Mandibular overdenture supported by conventional implant diameter after bone expansion.

O: outcomes as follows:

Primary Outcome: Patient satisfaction, Questionnaire Visual analog scale (VAS), Measuring unit: Mm. (Geckili et al.

Secondary Outcome: Bone height change, Measuring device: DIGORA® X ray, Measuring unit: Mm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completely edentulous patients ranging from age 35 to 75 years
  • Angle's Class I skeletal relationship
  • Normal facial symmetry
  • Cooperative patients
  • Adequate inter-arch space not less than 12mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Temporomandibular disorders
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy
  • Flabby tissues or sharp mandibular residual ridge.
  • Heavy smokers.
  • Patient's with neuromuscular disorders
  • Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Angle's class II and III skeletal relationship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mini Dental implant
2 mini dental implant of diameter 2.8 mm with length 10 mm will be inserted mandiblular ridge ≥5 mm mesial to the mental foraminato support overdentures for the intervention group.
Device: Mini dental implant
titanium mini dental implant which diameter less than 3 mm
Other Names:
  • narrow dental implant
No Intervention: conventional implant
two slandered implant diameter 3.7 mm and length 10 mm will be placed in interforaminal region of mandiblular ridge support overdenture for the compartor group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: after six months of over denture insertion
Visual analogue scale: a scale from 0-10 where 0 represents unsatisfied and 10 represents highly satisfied.
after six months of over denture insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone height change
Time Frame: baseline (T0) initial bone height (millimetres), after six months usage of over denture(T1) bone height (millimetres), then after twelve-months usage of over denture(T2) bone height. 1st period (T1-T0) after 6 months 2nd period (T2-T1) after 12 months
measure the amount of bone height change in (millimetres) of all implant placed by DIGORA® X ray and Calliper device.
baseline (T0) initial bone height (millimetres), after six months usage of over denture(T1) bone height (millimetres), then after twelve-months usage of over denture(T2) bone height. 1st period (T1-T0) after 6 months 2nd period (T2-T1) after 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2017-10-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complete Edentulism

Clinical Trials on Mini dental implant

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Gabon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe