Decision Navigation for Advanced Prostate Cancer Treatment Options Using mHealth

October 26, 2020 updated by: Randy A. Jones, University of Virginia
Prostate cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer, and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the U.S. The subgroup of men with advanced prostate cancer is particularly vulnerable to difficult choices for treatment because of the nature of their disease and having limited options. This study will test the use of an innovative Registered Nurse-Community Patient Navigator team delivered interactive mHealth decision aid for patients with advanced prostate cancer to help facilitate informed shared decisions about anti-cancer treatment that affects their quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many patients with advanced prostate cancer along with their decision partners/ proxies (DPP) struggle with complex treatment decisions, such as when to start, change, or stop cancer directed treatment. Despite the utility of decision aids (DAs) to address decisional conflict, little is known about treatment decision-making for advanced cancers. The study's primary aim is to test the effects of a theory- based mHealth DA (CHAMPION) administered by Registered Nurse (RN)-Community Patient Navigator (CPN) teams to advanced prostate cancer patients and decision partners/proxies on the following outcomes: less decisional conflict/uncertainty, higher psychosocial quality of life domain (HRQL-PSY), and less regret at the time of making an anti-cancer treatment decision. The secondary aim is to evaluate the CPN role in delivery of the mHealth DA (CHAMPION) from the patients' and decision partners/proxies' perspective. Preliminary estimates of treatment effects by race to see if the data support a larger effect among African Americans versus Others in the primary and secondary aims will also be explored. This mixed-methods population-based randomized controlled trial will gather data from 158 patient/DPP pairs at three sites: University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, and Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center. The pretest/posttest design will measure a time period that includes three single-event decisions over the course of their cancer-directed treatment; and a qualitative retrospective design will allow exploring the experiences of both patients and their DPPs separately in an interview at the completion of the study. Stratification by race (African-American and Caucasian/Other) and decision point (starting vs. changing vs. stopping anticancer treatment) will be used. There will be two groups: the control (enhanced usual care [EUC]) group and the decision intervention (DI) group. The DI group will receive an interactive 7-component cognitive-behavioral skills mHealth program (DA) with a RN-CPN team, primarily focusing on decision-making during cancer treatment. Self-report measures will be used for all participants in addition to probes for the taped interviews with DI. The primary outcome measures are 1) decisional conflict (uncertainty), 2) decisional regret, 3) HRQL-PSY, and 4) decision-making participation preference. Generalized linear models will be used for data analysis for the quantitative component, and qualitative evaluation of the intervention will be conducted to capture each pair's experience of the CHAMPION intervention. This innovative mHealth DA delivered by a CPN is expected to increase acceptability and the uptake of both the DA and the technology components. This addresses several NIH/NINR innovative questions, through the use of information technology to promote health-related decision-making for providers and patients, examining patient outcomes for improvement in healthcare, as well as to engage and support individuals such as extended family, lay coaches, etc. to augment provider care and recommendations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

316

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Contact:
          • Jennifer Wenzel, PhD,RN,FAAN
          • Phone Number: 410-502-1114
          • Email: jwenzel@jhu.edu
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23219
        • Recruiting
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) stages III/ IV prostate cancer 2) life expectancy ≥6 months 3) Karnofsky Performance Status >60 4) willingness of a DPP (patient selected person who provides decisional support) to participate 5) pair ages >18 years 6) ability to understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe psychiatric problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care
Receive standard care
Experimental: Decision Intervention
Receives decision aid intervention that encompasses balance sheets, navigation, audio files, and interaction -- Cancer Health Aid to Manage Preferences and Improve Outcomes through Navigation (CHAMPION)
An interactive mHealth decision aid that includes immediate and over time quality of life (QL) graphical summaries for advanced prostate cancer patients to enhance informed, shared decision making and will also be used to assess the CPNs' role in the decision-making process.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision Conflict, Decision Regret, and Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale
Time Frame: 9 months
demonstrate less decisional conflict/uncertainty, higher QL (HRQL-PSY domain) and less regret at the time of making an anti-cancer treatment decision
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
semi-structured interview
Time Frame: 9 months
evaluate community patient navigator role in delivery of decision aid
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randy A Jones, PhD,RN,FAAN, University of Virginia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision Support Techniques

Clinical Trials on CHAMPION

3
Subscribe