Correlation Between iXip and Final Pathology Specimen From Radical Prostatectomy: a Multicenter Prospective Trial

July 17, 2018 updated by: Alessandro Antonelli, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

Correlation Between Immune compleX Predictive Index and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness at Radical Prostetecomy Specimens: a Multicenter Prospective Trial

The Immune compleX Predictive Index (iXip) is a predictive tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis that integrates PSA, PSA-IgM, prostate volume and age of the patient. An algorithm processes these parameters providing the probability of prostate cancer. Several prospective studies confirmed its ability to predict prostate cancer presence at biopsy and therefore to reduce the rate of useless prostate biopsies. Moreover, preliminary results from a prospective study showed that iXip could predict cancer aggressiveness, too.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Since the 90s, serum PSA has become the cornerstone of diagnosis of PCa, However, due to its proven poor specificity, the actual role of PSA testing has been largely debated, especially if used during opportunistic screening programs. leading to a significant risk of over-diagnosis and over treatment.

In order to overcome drawbacks of PSA-based diagnostic pathway several PSA-derivates has been proposed. However, they were marginally used in clinical practice because not supplied by public health care systems.

The Immune compleX Predictive Index (iXip) is a predictive tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis that integrates PSA, PSA-IgM, prostate volume and age of the patient. An algorithm processes these parameters providing the probability of prostate cancer. Several prospective studies confirmed its ability to predict prostate cancer presence at biopsy and therefore to reduce the rate of useless prostate biopsies. Moreover, preliminary results from a prospective study showed that iXip could predict cancer aggressiveness, too.

All pathological specimens are analyzed by an expert uropathologist, following ISUP reccomandations.

Before radical prostectomy a blood sample from each patients is collected. Serum PSA-IgM concentration is measured using Prostate-IC kit in duplicate. The analysis with Prostate-IC kit was performed on automated ELISA analyzer.Then the iXip index is calculated by using the online calculator (http://ixip.xeptagen.com/).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male patients with prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria are:

  • histologically proven prostate cancer,
  • patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy
  • paziente able to provide consent
  • age > 18 years or < 80 years

Exclusion criteria are:

  • neiadjuvant hormone therapy
  • salvage radical prostatectomy
  • concomitant solid or hematological tumors,
  • autoimmune disorders
  • or immunosuppressive therapies,
  • acute bacterial or viral infections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between iXip and significant prostate carcer
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and significant prostate carcer at final pathology specimens, defined as tumor volume > 0.5 cm3 and Gleason scor equal or superior to 7. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features.
6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between iXip and tumor volume > 0.5 cm3
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( >0.5cm3 tumor volume )
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and tumor volume > 2.5 cm3
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( >2.5cm3 tumor volume ).
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and Gleason Score >6
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( Gleason Score> 6)
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and pathological stage > pT2
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( pathological staging >pT2)
6 months after surgery
correlation between iXip and positive lymph node at final pathology specimens
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
clinical and pathological correlation between iXip values and tumour volume at final pathology specimens. iXip values are expressed as a percentage and vary from 0% to 100%. Higher iXip values (>30%) should be associated with aggressive pathological features ( positive lymph nodes >0)
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Antonelli, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia (Italy)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Immune compleX Predictive Index

3
Subscribe