- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03568461
Efficacy and Safety of Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma (ELARA)
A Phase II, Single Arm, Multicenter Open Label Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) in Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Herston, Australia, QLD 4006
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
New South Wales
-
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Victoria
-
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Linz, Austria, 4020
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75475
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ulm, Germany, 89081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Bavaria
-
Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81377
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
North Rhine-Westphalia
-
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 50937
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
BO
-
Bologna, BO, Italy, 40138
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
MI
-
Milan, MI, Italy, 20132
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 8128582
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Hokkaido
-
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8648
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Miyagi
-
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan, 9808574
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
North Holland
-
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HV
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Norway
-
Oslo, Norway, Norway, 0310
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Seville, Spain, 41013
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
West Midlands
-
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Duarte, California, United States, 91010 3000
- City of Hope National Medical Center
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- UCSF Medical Center
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- Uni of Chi Medi Ctr Hema and Onco
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- Univ of Kansas Hosp and Med Ctr
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109 5271
- Michigan Med University of Michigan
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health Sciences University
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania Clinical
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- MD Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Refractory or relapsed Follicular Lymphoma (Grade 1, 2, 3A)
- Radiographically measurable disease at screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of histologic transformation
- Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3B
- Prior anti-CD19 therapy
- Prior gene therapy
- Prior adoptive T cell therapy
- Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Active CNS involvement by malignancy
Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CTL019
All patients who received tisagenlecleucel infusion.
|
Tisagenlecleucel is single infusion.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) recorded from tisagenlecleucel infusion until progressive disease or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first.
CRR was determined by an independent review committee (IRC) and was based on Lugano 2014 classification response criteria.
The radiological response is first obtained from CT and PET studies according to the Lugano 2014 criteria.
CT response is based on anatomical measurements of index/non-index/new lesions and spleen length.
The possible response outcomes are complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD).
PET response based on a 5-point scale (5PS) or Deauville score.
The possible outcomes for PET response are complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), no metabolic response (NMR), or progressive metabolic disease (PMD).
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall disease response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Response was evaluated per Lugano 2014 classification response criteria.
The radiological response is first obtained from CT and PET studies according to the Lugano 2014 criteria.
CT response is based on anatomical measurements of index/non-index/new lesions and spleen length.
The possible response outcomes are complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD).
PET response based on a 5-point scale (5PS) or Deauville score.
The possible outcomes for PET response are complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), no metabolic response (NMR), or progressive metabolic disease (PMD).
|
1 year
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: approx. 60 months
|
Duration of response (DOR) applied only to participants whose best overall disease response was CR or PR.
It is defined as the time from the date of first documented disease response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to follicular lymphoma (FL).
DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
approx. 60 months
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) for Complete Response (CR) Only Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: approx. 60 months
|
Duration of response (DOR) applied only to participants whose best overall disease response was complete response (CR) only.
It is defined as the time from the date of first documented disease response (CR only) to the date of first documented progression or death due to follicular lymphoma (FL).
DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
approx. 60 months
|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: up to 61.7 months
|
Progression free survival is the time from tisagenlecleucel infusion to first documented disease progression or death due to any cause.
PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
up to 61.7 months
|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: up to 65.8 months
|
Overall Survival is the time from tisagenlecleucel infusion to death due to any cause.
OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
up to 65.8 months
|
|
Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Concentration Levels as Measured by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Method, by Clinical Response Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: Month 60 (peripheral blood), Month 6 (bone marrow)
|
This is the summary of cellular kinetic concentrations for tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) transgene levels in peripheral blood and bone marrow following infusion.
|
Month 60 (peripheral blood), Month 6 (bone marrow)
|
|
Cmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response IRC Assessment
Time Frame: up to 60 months after infusion
|
Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed in peripheral blood after single dose administration.
Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters parameters.
|
up to 60 months after infusion
|
|
Tmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment
Time Frame: up to 60 months after infusion
|
Tmax is the time to reach maximum (peak) peripheral blood after single dose administration (days).
Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters.
|
up to 60 months after infusion
|
|
AUC0-28d and AUC0-84d; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment
Time Frame: 0 to 28 days after infusion, 0 to 84 days after infusion
|
AUC0-28 is the area under curve (AUC) from time zero to day 28 in peripheral blood.
AUC0-84d is the AUC from time zero to day 84 in peripheral blood.
Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters.
|
0 to 28 days after infusion, 0 to 84 days after infusion
|
|
AUC0-28d and AUC0-84d; Cellular Kinetic Parameter for Tisagenlecleucel by Flow Cytometry, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment
Time Frame: AUC0-28d: from time of infusion to 28 days post-dose; AUC0-84d: from time of infusion to 84 days post-infusion
|
Exposure is summarized as area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 28 days (AUC0-28d) and from time to 84 days (AUC0-84d).
The cellular kinetic parameters were estimated from the percentages of CD3+/CTL019+ cells obtained from flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry measures the surface expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) on T cells.
|
AUC0-28d: from time of infusion to 28 days post-dose; AUC0-84d: from time of infusion to 84 days post-infusion
|
|
Cmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter for Tisagenlecleucel by Flow Cytometry, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment
Time Frame: From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion
|
Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed in peripheral blood after single dose administration.
Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters parameters.
|
From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion
|
|
Summary of Exposure of CD3+ Tisagenlecleucel Cells in Peripheral Blood for Tmax
Time Frame: From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion
|
In vivo cellular kinetics of CD3+/CTL019+ levels tisagenlecleucel cells detected by flow cytometry base on best overall response (BOR).
The cellular kinetic parameters were estimated from the percentages of CD3+/CTL019+ cells obtained from flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry measures the surface expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) on T cells.
|
From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion
|
|
Humoral Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Anti-mCAR19 Antibodies, Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: at any time post-baseline, up to 24 months post-infusion
|
Antibody titers specific to the tisagenlecleucel molecule prior to and following infusion.
Percentage of participants who tested positive for anti-mCAR19 antibodies at any time post-baseline.
A participant was only defined as positive for tisagenlecleucel treatment-induced or -boosted anti-mCAR19 antibodies when the anti-mCAR19 antibody median fluorescence intensity (MFI) at any time post-infusion was at least 2.28-fold higher than pre-infusion levels for patients whose baseline status was positive (boosted) or if the baseline status was negative, but any post-baseline interpretation was positive (induced).
|
at any time post-baseline, up to 24 months post-infusion
|
|
Cellular Immunogenicity: Percentage of Interferon Gamma (IFNg+) Cells by Flow Cytometry Per IRC Assessment
Time Frame: pre-infusion (pre-Lymph depletion evaluation), 24 months post-infusion
|
Activation of T-cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from participants in response to mCAR19-derived peptides was used to assess the cellular immunogenicity against tisagenlecleucel. T-cell activation was measured by the percentage of interferon gamma (IFNg+) cells by flow cytometry. Cellular responses to mCART peptides were measured pre-infusion (enrollment) and post-tisagenlecleucel infusion. Pool 1 and Pool 2 are a pool of 60 peptides (peptides 1-60) and 59 peptides (peptides 61-119) , respectively, corresponding to the CTL019 transgene product. Together, they comprised 119 peptides spanning the CTL019 transgene product and were used to stimulate PBMCs to detect antigen-specific T cell responses via intracellular cytokine staining. |
pre-infusion (pre-Lymph depletion evaluation), 24 months post-infusion
|
|
Summary Scores of Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measured by SF-36v2 Quality of Life Questionnaire by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24
|
Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v2 form.
The SF-36 v2 is a widely used and extensively studied instrument to measure health-related quality of life among healthy patients and patients with acute and chronic conditions.
It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health.
Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) were computed by summing the item responses on the questions for each domain in accordance with the respective scoring method provided by the developers.
Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
A high score defines a more favorable health state.
|
Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24
|
|
Summary Scores of PRO Measured by SF-36v2 Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Change from baseline (CFB) M3, CFB M6, CFB M9, CFB M12, CFB M18, CFB M24
|
Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v2 form.
The SF-36 v2 is a widely used and extensively studied instrument to measure health-related quality of life among healthy patients and patients with acute and chronic conditions.
It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health.
Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) were computed by summing the item responses on the questions for each domain in accordance with the respective scoring method provided by the developers.
Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
A high score defines a more favorable health state.
|
Change from baseline (CFB) M3, CFB M6, CFB M9, CFB M12, CFB M18, CFB M24
|
|
Health Status Measured by EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (BL), Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 36
|
Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 3-Level instrument (EQ-5D-3L).
The EQ-5D-3L is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate health status in adults.
It consists of two sections.
The first includes one item for each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
Patients rate each dimension as "no problems" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), or "extreme problems" (level 3).
This record summarizes, for each of the five dimensions, the number of patients falling into each response level.
|
Baseline (BL), Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 36
|
|
Summary Scores of PRO Measured by EQ-VAS Quality of Life Questionnaire by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36
|
Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the EQ-VAS (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale).
The EQ-VAS is a 20 cm vertical, 0-100 numerical scale used alongside the EQ-5D questionnaire to measure a patient's self-rated health.
It anchors "best imaginable health" (100) at the top and "worst imaginable health" (0) at the bottom, providing a quick, subjective, quantitative, and global assessment of health status on the day of survey.
The second section of the questionnaire measures self-rated (global) health status utilizing a vertically oriented visual analogue scale where 100 represents the "best possible health state" and 0 represents the "worst possible health state."
|
Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36
|
|
Summary Scores of PRO Measured by EQ-VAS Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB
|
Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the EQ-VAS (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale).
The EQ-VAS is a 20 cm vertical, 0-100 numerical scale used alongside the EQ-5D questionnaire to measure a patient's self-rated health.
It anchors "best imaginable health" (100) at the top and "worst imaginable health" (0) at the bottom, providing a quick, subjective, quantitative, and global assessment of health status on the day of survey
|
Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB
|
|
Summary Scores of PRO Measured by FACT-Lym Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36
|
The effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire, which measures quality of life in participants with lymphoma.
FACT-Lym is composed of the FACT-G (27 items across Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional Well-Being, plus Additional Concerns) and a 15-item lymphoma-specific subscale.
All items use a five-point self-administered response scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
The possible score ranges are as follows: - Physical Well-Being (PWB): 0-28 - Social/Family Well-Being (SWB): 0-28 - Emotional Well-Being (EWB): 0-24 - Functional Well-Being (FWB): 0-28 - Lym Subscale (15 items): 0-60 - Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI: PWB + FWB + Lym): 0-116 - FACT-G Total (PWB + SWB + EWB + FWB): 0-108 - FACT-Lym Total (FACT-G + Lym): 0-168 In all cases, higher scores indicate better outcomes within the corresponding domain.
|
Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36
|
|
Summary Scores of PRO Measured by FACT-Lym Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB
|
The effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire, which measures quality of life in participants with lymphoma.
FACT-Lym is composed of the FACT-G (27 items across Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional Well-Being, plus Additional Concerns) and a 15-item lymphoma-specific subscale.
All items use a five-point self-administered response scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
The possible score ranges are as follows: - Physical Well-Being (PWB): 0-28 - Social/Family Well-Being (SWB): 0-28 - Emotional Well-Being (EWB): 0-24 - Functional Well-Being (FWB): 0-28 - Lym Subscale (15 items): 0-60 - Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI: PWB + FWB + Lym): 0-116 - FACT-G Total (PWB + SWB + EWB + FWB): 0-108 - FACT-Lym Total (FACT-G + Lym): 0-168 In all cases, higher scores indicate better outcomes within the corresponding domain.
|
Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Salles G, Schuster SJ, Dreyling M, Fischer L, Kuruvilla J, Patten PEM, von Tresckow B, Smith SM, Jimenez-Ubieto A, Davis KL, Anjos C, Chu J, Zhang J, Lobetti Bodoni C, Thieblemont C, Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Martinez-Lopez J, Wang Y, Link BK. Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2022 Nov 22;6(22):5835-5843. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008150.
- Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Dreyling M, Martinez-Lopez J, Kolstad A, Butler J, Ghosh M, Popplewell L, Chavez JC, Bachy E, Kato K, Harigae H, Kersten MJ, Andreadis C, Riedell PA, Ho PJ, Perez-Simon JA, Chen AI, Nastoupil LJ, von Tresckow B, Ferreri AJM, Teshima T, Patten PEM, McGuirk JP, Petzer AL, Offner F, Viardot A, Zinzani PL, Malladi R, Zia A, Awasthi R, Masood A, Anak O, Schuster SJ, Thieblemont C. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: the phase 2 ELARA trial. Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):325-332. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01622-0. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
- Dreyling M, Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Martinez-Lopez J, Kolstad A, Butler J, Ghosh M, Popplewell L, Chavez JC, Bachy E, Kato K, Harigae H, Kersten MJ, Andreadis C, Riedell PA, Ho PJ, Perez-Simon JA, Chen AI, Nastoupil LJ, von Tresckow B, Maria Ferreri AJ, Teshima T, Patten PEM, McGuirk JP, Petzer AL, Offner F, Viardot A, Zinzani PL, Malladi R, Paule I, Zia A, Awasthi R, Han X, Germano D, O'Donovan D, Ramos R, Maier HJ, Masood A, Thieblemont C, Schuster SJ. Durable response after tisagenlecleucel in adults with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: ELARA trial update. Blood. 2024 Apr 25;143(17):1713-1725. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021567.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms
- Disease Attributes
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Lymphatic Diseases
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
- Lymphoma
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
- Recurrence
- Lymphoma, Follicular
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Antineoplastic Agents
- tisagenlecleucel
Other Study ID Numbers
- CCTL019E2202
- 2017-004385-94 (EudraCT Number)
- 2023-508127-13-00 (Registry Identifier: EU CTIS)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Follicular Lymphoma
-
University of California, DavisNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Genentech, Inc.; Pharmacyclics LLC.Active, not recruitingAnn Arbor Stage II Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage III Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage IV Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 3a Follicular LymphomaUnited States
-
Evopoint Biosciences Inc.RecruitingFollicular Lymphoma, Grade 1 | Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 2 | Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3A | Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 3China
-
University of WashingtonEli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingRecurrent Follicular Lymphoma | Refractory Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 3a Follicular LymphomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage III Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Stage III Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Stage III Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma | Stage IV Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Stage IV Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Stage IV Grade 3 Follicular LymphomaUnited States
-
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research InstituteBristol-Myers Squibb; Barwon Health; Austin Health; Eastern Health; Fiona Stanley... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingFollicular Lymphoma Stage II | Follicular Lymphoma Stage III | Follicular Lymphoma Stage IVAustralia
-
Robert LowskyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Janssen, LP; The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society; Rising Tide FoundationCompletedMantle Cell Lymphoma | Marginal Zone Lymphoma | Recurrent Follicular Lymphoma | Refractory Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 3a Follicular LymphomaUnited States
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalRecruitingAnn Arbor Stage II Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage III Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage IV Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Grade 3a Follicular LymphomaChina
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterFox Chase Cancer Center; Pharmacyclics LLC.TerminatedFollicular Lymphoma | Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 1 | Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 2 | Follicular Lymphoma Grade IIIaUnited States
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi ONLUSCompletedFollicular Lymphoma, Grade 1 | Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 2 | Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3AItaly
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Celgene CorporationActive, not recruitingAnn Arbor Stage III Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage III Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage IV Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage IV Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage II Grade 3 Contiguous Follicular Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage II Grade 3 Non-Contiguous... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on tisagenlecleucel
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingFollicular Lymphoma | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Diffuse Large B-cell LymphomaBrazil
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsTerminatedAcute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedDiffuse Large B-cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsWithdrawnDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingLeukemia | Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsWithdrawnB-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsTerminatedDiffuse Large B-cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingB-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Follicular LymphomaSouth Korea
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedB-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Relapsed B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma | B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaJapan, Canada