- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03574493
Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial (RESET) (RESET)
January 16, 2024 updated by: Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial (RESET): Laparotomy vs Laparoscopy vs Robotic vs TaTME Rectal Surgery Matched Parallel Cohort Trial for High Surgical Risk Cancer Patients, With Mid- to Low Rectal Cancer
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard of care for rectal cancer, which can be combined with low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer.
The narrow pelvic space and difficulties in obtaining adequate exposure make surgeries technically challenging.
Four techniques are used to perform the surgery: open laparotomy, laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery, and transanal surgery.
Comparative data for these techniques is required to provide clinical data on the surgical management of rectal cancers by surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial will be a prospective, observational, case-matched, four-cohort, multicenter trial designed to study TME with LAR using open laparotomy, laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery, or transanal surgery in high-surgical-risk patients with mid-to-low, non-metastatic rectal cancer.
All surgeries will be performed by surgeons experienced in a technique.
Oncologic, morbidity and functional outcomes will be assessed in a composite primary outcome, with success defined as circumferential resection margin ≥1 mm, TME grade III, and minimal postoperative morbidity (absence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications within 30 days after surgery).
Secondary endpoints will include the co-primary endpoints over the long-term (2 years), quality of surgery, quality of life, length of hospital stay, operative time, and rate of unplanned conversions.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1098
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jean-Pierre Bleuse, MD
- Phone Number: +33467613102
- Email: jean-pierre.bleuse@icm.unicancer.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34298
- Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
high- risk patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Rectal adenocarcinoma from middle and lower third (less than 10 cm from the anal verge) with a sphincter saving procedure
High risk operative patients (two of these factors as assessed on MRI):
- Obese patient with a BMI > 30 (male or female)
- Narrow pelvis: inter-tuberous distance < 10 cm
- Large tumoral volume with suspicion of close predictive margin (CRM ≤ 1 mm) at diagnosis
- Expected coloanal or ultra-low colorectal anastomosis
- Patients with adequate performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale score of ≤2)
- Patient has signed and dated the informed consent before inclusion in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with a comorbid illness or condition that would preclude the use of surgery.
- Patients with T4b tumors which impose a pelvectomy
- Patient requires an abdominal perineal resection (APR)
- Patients with concurrent or previous invasive pelvic malignant tumors (cervical, uterine, or rectal; excluding the prostate) within 5 years before study enrollment
- Patient undergoing emergency procedures
- Planned rectal surgery along with major concomitant procedures (e.g. hepatectomies, other intestinal resections)
- Metastatic disease
- Pregnant or suspected pregnancy
- Patients unwilling to comply with all follow-up study requirements
- Patient included in another study which impact on the surgical technique or its choice.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Open laparotomy
A surgical procedure involving a large incision through the abdominal wall to gain access into the abdominal cavity.
|
Several surgical techniques are used to perform TME.
Dissection using open laparotomy and minimally-invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominal approaches is performed in a 'top-down' manner, where the instruments are inserted transabdominally and the procedure progresses from splenic flexure/sigmoid colon mobilization to rectal resection.
A transanal approach may also be used, a 'bottom-up' procedure where instruments are inserted through the anus to perform rectal resection and TME
|
Laparoscopic surgery
A minimally-invasive technique in which operations are performed via small incisions (usually 0.5-1.5 cm) at a location distant to the site of interest.
|
Several surgical techniques are used to perform TME.
Dissection using open laparotomy and minimally-invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominal approaches is performed in a 'top-down' manner, where the instruments are inserted transabdominally and the procedure progresses from splenic flexure/sigmoid colon mobilization to rectal resection.
A transanal approach may also be used, a 'bottom-up' procedure where instruments are inserted through the anus to perform rectal resection and TME
|
Robot-assisted surgery using the da Vinci® Surgical System
A minimally-invasive approach that allows good precision, flexibility, and control.
|
Several surgical techniques are used to perform TME.
Dissection using open laparotomy and minimally-invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominal approaches is performed in a 'top-down' manner, where the instruments are inserted transabdominally and the procedure progresses from splenic flexure/sigmoid colon mobilization to rectal resection.
A transanal approach may also be used, a 'bottom-up' procedure where instruments are inserted through the anus to perform rectal resection and TME
|
Transanal surgery through the anus
Where the protectomy is performed down to up until the Douglas pouch
|
Several surgical techniques are used to perform TME.
Dissection using open laparotomy and minimally-invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominal approaches is performed in a 'top-down' manner, where the instruments are inserted transabdominally and the procedure progresses from splenic flexure/sigmoid colon mobilization to rectal resection.
A transanal approach may also be used, a 'bottom-up' procedure where instruments are inserted through the anus to perform rectal resection and TME
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Efficacy of surgical method (success determined by composite of Oncologic, morbidity and functional outcomes)
Time Frame: up to 4 years
|
CRM, TME grade III, The absence of clavien dindo grade III-IV complications within 30 days post op
|
up to 4 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philippe ROUANET, MD, ICM Co. Ltd.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP; TaTME Registry Collaborative. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: International Registry Results of the First 720 Cases. Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):111-117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948.
- van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
- Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jul;11(7):637-45. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
- Hompes R, Guy R, Jones O, Lindsey I, Mortensen N, Cunningham C. Transanal total mesorectal excision with a side-to-end stapled anastomosis - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;16(7):567. doi: 10.1111/codi.12660. No abstract available.
- Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, Han J, Song W, Wang J, Xu Z. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;14:61. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0816-6.
- Lee SH, Lim S, Kim JH, Lee KY. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015 Oct;89(4):190-201. doi: 10.4174/astr.2015.89.4.190. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
- Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e134-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02907.x.
- Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
- Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H, Ma Y. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3727-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2429-9. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):457-60. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-w.
- Buchs NC, Nicholson GA, Ris F, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R. Transanal total mesorectal excision: A valid option for rectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 7;21(41):11700-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11700.
- Sun Z, Kim J, Adam MA, Nussbaum DP, Speicher PJ, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1152-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001388.
- Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets GL, Pierie JP, Wiggers T, Breukink S. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;(4):CD005200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3.
- Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J; ALaCaRT Investigators. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
- Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1480-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0435-3. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
- Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.
- Chessin DB, Enker W, Cohen AM, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Saltz L, Minsky BD, Wong WD, Guillem JG. Complications after preoperative combined modality therapy and radical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer: a 14-year experience from a specialty service. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jun;200(6):876-82; discussion 882-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.027.
- Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Quirke P, Couture J, de Metz C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Griffiths G, Thompson LC, Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0.
- D'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:193.0.co;2-b.
- Sgarbura O, Gourgou S, Tosi D, Bakrin N, Bouazza N, Delaine S, De Forges H, Pocard M, Quenet F. MESOTIP: Phase II multicenter randomized trial evaluating the association of PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy vs. systemic chemotherapy alone as 1st-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Pleura Peritoneum. 2019 Jun 27;4(2):20190010. doi: 10.1515/pp-2019-0010. eCollection 2019 Jun 1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 16, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 29, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
July 2, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 17, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 16, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PROICM 2018-03 ORE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNovartis Pharmaceuticals; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal CancerUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingEvaluation of Quality of Life and Utilities Following Surgical Treatment of Stage I-IV Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteNatera, Inc.RecruitingEstablishing a ctDNA Biomarker to Improve Organ Preserving Strategies in Patients With Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science University; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNatera, Inc.; The Joseph Drown FoundationRecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally...United States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Recurrent Colon Cancer | Recurrent Rectal Cancer | Stage IVA Colon Cancer | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Locally...United States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterWithdrawnRecurrent Rectal Cancer | Stage I Rectal Cancer | Stage II Rectal Cancer | Stage III Rectal Cancer
Clinical Trials on TME with LAR
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleRecruiting
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityPeking Union Medical College Hospital; RenJi Hospital; Shengjing Hospital; First... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSurgery | Rectal Neoplasms MalignantChina
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingRectal Neoplasm MalignantChina
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompletedRectal Cancer | SurgeryChina
-
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University; Nanfang Hospital of Southern... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingRadiation-induced Intestinal Injury
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEnrolling by invitation
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingRadiation-induced Intestinal Injury
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzCompleted