Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tear

February 16, 2022 updated by: AAQardash, Assiut University

Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Tear of the Knee

The aim of this study is to evaluate and analyze the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of medial meniscal posterior root tears, including the normal variations in meniscal anatomy that may resemble a meniscal tear, and identifying the causes or nature of posterior medial meniscal root tear(degenerative versus traumatic) and correlate the results with the standard reference knee Arthroscopy.In addition to identifying and estimating the suspected cases of meniscal extrusion by making MRI with stress varus overloading simulating weight bearing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The knee joint is one of the most important joints in the human body responsible for weight-bearing and a group of complex movements during ordinary life activities and even in vigorous sports making it susceptible to different traumatic injuries.Knee pain is considered as one of the most common complaints of patients presenting to clinical practitioners.There are many structures within the knee which can cause pain. By far, one of the most common causes of knee pain is a meniscus tear.The meniscus is the most important cushion in the knee; It plays an important bio mechanical role in axial load distribution of the knees. If the meniscus is injured and the cushioning is lost, arthritis and pain can occur.Menisci can tear due to traumatic injury or degenerative wear, meniscal root tears are a type of meniscal tear in the knee where the tear extends to either the anterior or posterior meniscal root attachment to the central tibial plateau. They often tend to be radial tears extending into the root.The medial meniscal posterior root tear can occur especially in middle-aged or older patients who have a single event of posteromedial painful popping sensation during light activities.Magnetic resonance imaging is well established as the best imaging modality for evaluating a patient with suspected meniscal pathology, involving the medial meniscal posterior horn root.In recent years, posterior meniscal root tears have received increasing attention in both Arthroscopic and Magnetic resonance study. All sequences of Magnetic resonance imaging should be reviewed, but T2 weighted coronal sections should provide the best visualization of the posterior roots. The Magnetic resonance findings of a medial meniscal posterior radial root tear are shortening or absence of the root (ghost sign) on sagittal images and a vertical fluid cleft with truncation sign and features of meniscal extrusion on coronal images.

It is very important to avoid errors in diagnosing meniscal root tears. So interpreting Magnetic resonance examinations of the knee need to be aware of the attachments of the menisci and to understand the normal variations in meniscal anatomy that may resemble a meniscal tear.

Tears of the meniscal root are relatively uncommon, occurring in 2.2% - 9.8% of patients undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.However, it is important that these tears be diagnosed as several complications of meniscal root tear, including meniscal extrusion, secondary osteoarthritis, and subchondral insufficiency fracture.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Ashgan Ali Abdo Qardash

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either sex from more than 16 years, having acute or chronic painful knee associated with popping sounds are included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are contraindicated to Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination as those who have artificial cardiac pacemaker or metallic prosthesis not compatible with Magnetic Resonance Imaging or those with severe claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee
Patients complain of painful knee with clinical suspicious of medial meniscus posterior root tear of the knee will be examined by all Magnetic Resonance Imaging sequences including sagittal, coronal and axial PD,T2 and PD-SPIR weighted images, and correlate the results with Knee Arthroscopy.while the suspected cases of meniscal extrusion will make MRI using the knee coil for varus stress Overloading simulating weight bearing.
After clinical assessment, all the patients will examined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging to diagnose the medial meniscal posterior root tear,and the suspected cases of meniscal extrusion will make MRI using the knee coil for varus stress Overloading simulating weight bearing
Correlate all the magnetic resonance imaging results with the Knee Arthroscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients complain of painful knee joint associated with popping sounds and clinically suspected of medial meniscal posterior root tear will examined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation the results of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with gold standard knee Arthroscopy.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nisreen A. Abbas, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MRIOMMPRT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medial Meniscus, Posterior Horn Derangement

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the knee

Subscribe