Comparison of the Accuracy in Rehabilitation Exercise Between Mobile Application Actuated Rehabilitation Exercise Guidance and Routine Rehabilitation Exercise Guidance for the Primary Osteoarthritis Knee Patients
March 2, 2020 updated by: Satit Thiengwittayaporn, Navamindradhiraj University
Comparison of the Accuracy in Rehabilitation Exercise Between Mobile Application Actuated Rehabilitation Exercise Guidance and Routine Rehabilitation Exercise Guidance for the Primary Osteoarthritis Knee Patients : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluate the accuracy of physical therapy in various positions after 4 weeks of training, comparison of the accuracy in rehabilitation exercise between mobile application actuated rehabilitation exercise guidance and routine rehabilitation exercise guidance for the primary osteoarthritis knee patients
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Bangkok
-
Dusit, Bangkok, Thailand, 10300
- Navamindradhiraj University
-
-
Bangkok,
-
Dusit, Bangkok,, Thailand, 10300
- Navamindradhiraj University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary osteoarthritis of knee
- Have an android phone and use the application
Exclusion Criteria:
- There are other complications that may affect physiotherapy
- Communication problems
- Has been trained in physical therapy for osteoarthritis patients
- Have had total knee arthroplasty
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: mobile application actuated rehabilitation exercise guidance
|
Mobile applications (also known as mobile apps) are software programs developed for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, to teach full function following injury and involves restoring strength, flexibility, endurance, and power.
|
|
Active Comparator: routine rehabilitation exercise guidance
|
the teach to practice full function following injury and involves restoring strength, flexibility, endurance, and power.
It is achieved through various exercises and drills
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Outcome measurement to compare the accuracy
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To measurement by number of patient performing correct exercise has 3 exercise 10 steps and number of patient performing incorrect exercise has 3 exercise 10 steps.
to compare the accuracy when osteoarthritis knee patients do rehabilitation using mobile application actuated rehabilitation exercise guidance and routine rehabilitation exercise guidance.If the patient is able to perform at least 8 times (80%), the patient will be define as corrected physical therapy, We compare the correction of physical therapy between the groups.
|
1 month
|
|
Patient satisfaction of rehabilitation method
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To compare the satisfaction of rehabilitation method after rehabilitation program of physical therapy by questionnaire. The satisfaction score has 5 point. The 1 point mean the least satisfaction of patient to the method. The 2 point mean the less satisfaction of patient to the method. The 3 point mean the moderate satisfaction of patient to the method. The 4 point mean the much satisfaction of patient to the method. The 5 point mean the most satisfaction of patient to the method. |
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 4, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
December 2, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 10, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
September 12, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 3, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- COA 034/2561
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.