The Effect of Self-rehabilitation Using Communication APP After Arthroscopic Surgery for Rotator Cuff Tear

Using a Mobile APP to Support Home-based Rehabilitation for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tear After Arthroscopic Repair

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effect of a mobile application supporting home-based rehabilitation for the patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The investigators hypothesized the clinical results of the patients using a mobile application (APP) to support the home-based rehabilitation were comparable to the patients receiving the supervised rehabilitation.

This prospective randomized case-control study was approved by the institutional review board of the Kaohsiung Veteran General Hospital (IRB No. KSVGH18-CT12-15) prior to enroll any patients. Patients were recruited if they had a small to medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tear or, a Lafosse type II or III subscapularis tear diagnosed and then repaired under shoulder arthroscope. After the surgery, patients were randomized either to the home-based rehabilitation (the home group) or the hospital supervised rehabilitation (the supervised group).

In the home group, patients self-managed rehabilitation exercise without supervision. Rehabilitation were supportive with the APP. Patient could communicate with the physician via the APP. In the supervised group, patients attended one-on-one instructions with therapists and exercised under supervision at hospital.

Patients' characters were recorded. Peri-operative factors associated with rotator cuff healing were assessed. The active ROM (forward elevation, abduction, external and internal rotation), the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, the American shoulder and elbow surgeon shoulder (ASES) scores and the modified Constant scores were recorded pre-operatively and post-operatively 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The isometric shoulder strength was assessed with the hand-held dynamometer. The compliance of post-operative rehabilitation was evaluated not only from patients' self-reported logs but also by physicians at post-operatively 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Tendon integrity was evaluated with MRI scan at least 6 months after the index surgery. In the pilot study, we found a mean difference of 4 points and a standard deviation of 5.5 points in the modified Constant scores. Power analysis revealed a total sample size of 62 patients (31 patients in each group) would achieve a statistical power of 0.8 with a two-tailed level of 0.05 to detect significant differences. Statistical level of significance was defined as p<0.05.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Rotator Cuff Tears
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Home-based rehabilitation supporting with the mobile application; Behavioral: Supervised rehabilitation by the therapist

Detailed Description

Introduction- Arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tear had been accepted wildly. It had been demonstrated that surgical management improved life quality and reduced economic burdens. However, joint stiffness and cuff re-tear, the two most common complications after arthroscopic cuff repair were concerned. Post-operative rehabilitation and its compliance are crucial for resilience. For rehabilitation, performing exercise too slowly caused joint stiffness, but too aggressively increased the risk of cuff re-tear. To prevent these complications, supervised physical therapy was advised after rotator cuff repair. However, the associated cost of rehabilitation under supervision exacerbated patients' financial burden. Home-based rehabilitation had been proposed and employed wildly, such as for the cardiopulmonary function after coronary artery disease, the ambulation training after joint replacement and the muscle strengthening after ACL reconstruction. In the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder and rotator cuff tear, patients with home-based physical therapy obtained comparable outcomes to supervised physical therapy. After arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the clinical benefit of home-based rehabilitation was still controversial. In previous studies, supervised rehabilitation was not superior to home-based rehabilitation in long-term functional outcomes. However, some authors considered that the rehabilitation under supervision reduced the risk of cuff re-tear and joint stiffness. Furthermore, the patients who received the home-based rehabilitation supporting with a booklet or videotape had inferior compliance. For resolving the above-mentioned problems, supporting with a mobile application was possibly an alternative. It is a trend nowadays that telerehabilitation was assisted with mobile applications, such as for patients with stroke, spinal cord injury and musculoskeletal trauma. There was still lack of the literature about such rehabilitation method for the patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effect of a mobile application supporting home-based rehabilitation for the patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The investigators hypothesized the clinical results of the patients using a mobile application to support the home-based rehabilitation were comparable to the patients receiving the supervised rehabilitation.

Patients Registries- This prospective randomized case-control study was approved by the institutional review board of the Kaohsiung Veteran General Hospital (IRB No. KSVGH18-CT12-15) prior to enroll any patients. Eligible patients were determined by the attending surgeon. After the surgery, a research assistant conducted the informed consent process before the enrollment in the study. Subjects were randomized either to the home-based rehabilitation (the home group) or the hospital supervised rehabilitation (the supervised group). Each patient was assigned a study number in a consecutive sequence. A randomization sequence using two variables was determined by the mobile application. The allocation of two rehabilitation modes according to the randomization sequence was designated to each subject in a sealed envelope. The therapist opened envelopes at the 1st day post-operatively.

Surgical procedures- Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for all patients were performed by a single senior surgeon (F.H) at Kaohsiung Veteran General Hospital. Under general anesthesia, patients sit on the beach-chair. The posterior, posterolateral, lateral, and anterolateral portals were created. Intra-articular lesions including subscapularis and biceps long-head tendon were evaluated via the posterior viewing portal. For a Lafosse type II or III tear, subscapularis was repaired with one or two anchors under posterior visualization. Tenotomy, tenodesis or labrum repair for biceps lesions was performed according to labrum tear pattern, age, and functional demand. Rotator cuff lesion was addressed while viewing from the lateral portal. The dimension of involved cuff from anterior to posterior was measured with a probe. Single- or double-row repair was performed based on tear size and pattern. Acromioplasty or partial distal clavicle resection was performed if indicated.

Rehabilitation protocol- All patients received the one standard rehabilitation protocol and used the booklet that described the rehabilitation exercise in detail. The 6-month rehabilitation protocol consisted of four stages. The first stage was the immobilization phase that patients wear the arm sling for 2-4 weeks. The second stage was the ROM phase that patients started from passive to assisted-active ROM for 4-6 weeks. The third stage was the low-tensity training phase that patients allowed active ROM and isokinetic elastic-band exercise for 4-8 weeks. The fourth stage was the joint stabilization phase that patients focused on training the muscle for scapular stabilization and continued isokinetic exercise at least 2 months post-operatively. All patients were follow-up in the clinic every 4-6 weeks after the surgery. After the clinical visit, they were instructed by therapists to perform exercise at home while proceeding the next rehabilitation stage. The exercise program was adjusted according to the recovery status of each patient.

Intervention- In the home group, patients managed rehabilitation exercise by themselves after the surgery without supervision. Rehabilitation protocol and exercise instruction video were available in the APP. Patient could communicate with the physician and therapist via the APP. In the supervised group, subjects attended one-on-one instructions with a therapist (once a week at post-operative 2nd~12th week and once two weeks at post-operative 13th~24th week; totally 16 sessions in the 6-month rehabilitation program) and exercised under supervision at hospital. Subjects would receive additional sessions based on the rehabilitation progress. Subjects could cancel scheduled sessions by personal reasons. We provided telephone consultation without APP communication for subjects in the supervised group.

Outcome evaluation- Patients characters including age, sex, body mass index, arm dominance, trauma history, education background and functional demand were recorded. Peri-operative factors associated with rotator cuff healing were assessed. The active ROM (forward elevation, abduction, external and internal rotation), the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, the American shoulder and elbow surgeon shoulder (ASES) scores and the modified Constant scores were recorded by a research assistant preoperatively and post-operatively 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Biceps, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and supraspinatus index were measured post-operatively 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The compliance of post-operative rehabilitation was assessed at post-operatively 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Tendon integrity was evaluated with MRI scan (a 1.5-T unit) at least 6 months after the surgery.

Sample size analysis and statistics methods- In the pilot study, the investigators found a mean difference of 4 points and a standard deviation of 5.5 points in the modified Constant scores. Power analysis revealed a total sample size of 62 patients (31 patients in each group) would achieve a statistical power of 0.8 with a two-tailed level of 0.05 to detect significant differences. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (version 23; IBM, Armonk, NY). Categorical data between groups were compared with the Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Comparisons of normally distributed continuous data with the independent t-test and non-normally distributed continuous data with the rank sum test were performed. The analysis of covariance was used to compare the subjective scores (the VAS pain scores, ASES scores and modified Constant scores) and objective outcomes (active ROM and muscle index) between two groups. Statistical level of significance was defined as p<0.05.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 60
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Futing Huang, MD; Phone Number: 886-910775551; Email: fthuang@vghks.gov.tw

Study Locations

• Taiwan
  • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
    • Recruiting
    • Kaohsiung Veterns General Hospital
    • Contact: Futing Huang, MD; Phone Number: 886-910775551; Email: fthuang@vghks.gov.tw

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients had a small to medium-sized (less than 3 cm) full-thickness rotator cuff tear or, a Lafosse type II or III subscapularis tear diagnosed and repaired by shoulder arthroscope
• patients were willing to consent to post-operative rehabilitation randomization and commit to the two-year clinical follow-up period.

Exclusion Criteria:

• pre-operative shoulder stiffness (defined as passive forward elevation less than 100 degrees and external rotation loss over 50% comparing to the contralateral side)
• an intra-operative irreparable cuff tear
• a prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery
• a history of systemic auto-immune disease or septic arthritis of the ipsilateral shoulder

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rehabilitation with mobile application; Patients self-managed rehab exercise with a supportive mobile application	Behavioral: Home-based rehabilitation supporting with the mobile application; For patients with mobile application supportive rehabilitation, patients managed rehabilitation exercise by themselves after the surgery without supervision. Rehabilitation protocol and exercise instruction video were available in the application. Patient could communicate with the physician and therapist via the application.; Other Names: Home exercise
Active Comparator: Rehabilitation under supervision; Patients received supervised physical therapy	Behavioral: Supervised rehabilitation by the therapist; For patients with therapist supervised rehabilitation, patients attended one-on-one instructions with a therapist (once a week at post-operative 2nd~12th week and once two weeks at post-operative 13th~24th week; totally 16 sessions in the 6-month rehabilitation program) and exercised under supervision at hospital. Subjects would receive additional sessions based on the rehabilitation progress. Subjects could cancel scheduled sessions by personal reasons. We provided telephone consultation without APP communication for subjects in the supervised group.; Other Names: Supervised exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The modified Constant scores	The Constant scores (the total score - 100 maximal points) included both physical examination findings of motion and strength (65 points) and patient-reported subjective evaluation of shoulder function (35 points) to analyze the function of normal and diseased shoulders. The scale consisted of several sections: pain (15 points), patient-reported function with activities of daily living (20 points), range of motion (40 points), and strength testing (25 points). Finally, the scores was normalized to the age and sex of the subject as the modified Constant scores. A higher score indicates better shoulder function.	post-op 6 months
The modified Constant scores	The Constant scores (the total score - 100 maximal points) included both physical examination findings of motion and strength (65 points) and patient-reported subjective evaluation of shoulder function (35 points) to analyze the function of normal and diseased shoulders. The scale consisted of several sections: pain (15 points), patient-reported function with activities of daily living (20 points), range of motion (40 points), and strength testing (25 points). Finally, the scores was normalized to the age and sex of the subject as the modified Constant scores. A higher score indicates better shoulder function.	post-op 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The American shoulder and elbow surgeon shoulder (ASES) scores	The ASES score contains a physician-rated and patient-rated section. The pain visual analog scale (VAS) and 10 functional questions are used to tabulate the reported ASES score. The total score - 100 maximum points - is weighted 50% for pain and 50% for function. The pain score (maximum 50 points) is calculated by subtracting the VAS from 10 and multiplying by five. The functional score is calculated from 10 questions(a scale from 0 to 3) for a maximal score of 50 points. The pain and functional portions are then summed to obtain the final ASES score. A higher score represent better function.	post-op 6 months
The American shoulder and elbow surgeon shoulder (ASES) scores	The ASES score contains a physician-rated and patient-rated section. The pain visual analog scale (VAS) and 10 functional questions are used to tabulate the reported ASES score. The total score - 100 maximum points - is weighted 50% for pain and 50% for function. The pain score (maximum 50 points) is calculated by subtracting the VAS from 10 and multiplying by five. The functional score is calculated from 10 questions(a scale from 0 to 3) for a maximal score of 50 points. The pain and functional portions are then summed to obtain the final ASES score. A higher score represent better function.	post-op 24 months
The degree of active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint	Regarding evaluation of the degree of active shoulder ROM, the angle for forward flexion, abduction, external rotation with the arm at the side was measured with a goniometer. Internal rotation was recorded by the maximal height achieved with the ipsilateral thumb when attempting to reach behind the back (ipsilateral thumb to the point of anatomic landmarks：0 points=lateral aspect of thigh, 2 points=behind buttock, 4 points=sacroiliac joint, 6 points=waist, 8 points=12th thoracic vertebrae, 10 points=inter-scapular level).	post-op 6 months
The degree of active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint	Regarding evaluation of the degree of active shoulder ROM, the angle for forward flexion, abduction, external rotation with the arm at the side was measured with a goniometer. Internal rotation was recorded by the maximal height achieved with the ipsilateral thumb when attempting to reach behind the back (ipsilateral thumb to the point of anatomic landmarks：0 points=lateral aspect of thigh, 2 points=behind buttock, 4 points=sacroiliac joint, 6 points=waist, 8 points=12th thoracic vertebrae, 10 points=inter-scapular level).	post-op 24 months
The biceps, subscapularis, Infraspinatus and supraspinatus index	Biceps, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and supraspinatus index were defined as the ratio of bilateral maximal isometric strength in a specific motion. The isometric strength was assessed with MicroFET hand-held dynamometer (MicroFET 2, Hogan Health Industries Inc., Biometrics, The Netherlands). Biceps strength was measured by the resistance of elbow flexion to 90 degrees with supinated forearm. Subscapularis strength was measured by the lift-off test in prone position. Infraspinatus and supraspinatus strength were measured by the resistance of shoulder external rotation and shoulder abduction respectively in lying side position. Subjects gradually increased the force and sustained in maximum for 3 seconds. For eliciting maximum strength, each muscle contraction was performed for 5 seconds and repeated two times with a 10-second interval.	post-op 6 months
The biceps, subscapularis, Infraspinatus and supraspinatus index	Biceps, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and supraspinatus index were defined as the ratio of bilateral maximal isometric strength in a specific motion. The isometric strength was assessed with MicroFET hand-held dynamometer (MicroFET 2, Hogan Health Industries Inc., Biometrics, The Netherlands). Biceps strength was measured by the resistance of elbow flexion to 90 degrees with supinated forearm. Subscapularis strength was measured by the lift-off test in prone position. Infraspinatus and supraspinatus strength were measured by the resistance of shoulder external rotation and shoulder abduction respectively in lying side position. Subjects gradually increased the force and sustained in maximum for 3 seconds. For eliciting maximum strength, each muscle contraction was performed for 5 seconds and repeated two times with a 10-second interval.	post-op 24 months
The integrity of rotator cuff tendon	Tendon integrity was evaluated with MRI scan (a 1.5-T unit) at least 6 months after the repair. The images were reviewed by the senior radiologist who was blinded to the rehabilitation group of patients. Tendon integrity was determined as "intact", "partial tear" and "complete tear", according to Sugaya's classification.	post-op 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The grade of compliance of post-operative rehabilitation	The compliance of post-operative rehabilitation was evaluated not only from patients' self-reported logs but also by physicians at post-operatively 6 weeks. For patients, the log recorded the grade of home-exercise frequency as "high" (exercise 5-7 days per week), "intermediate" (exercise 2-4 days per week) and "low" (exercise 0-1 day per week). In the clinics, physicians questioned patients about the rehab-principle, activity, and frequency to assess of the compliance of doing home-exercise in three grades (high, intermediate, and low).	post-op 6 weeks
The grade of compliance of post-operative rehabilitation	The compliance of post-operative rehabilitation was evaluated not only from patients' self-reported logs but also by physicians at post-operatively 12 weeks. For patients, the log recorded the grade of home-exercise frequency as "high" (exercise 5-7 days per week), "intermediate" (exercise 2-4 days per week) and "low" (exercise 0-1 day per week). In the clinics, physicians questioned patients about the rehab-principle, activity, and frequency to assess of the compliance of doing home-exercise in three grades (high, intermediate, and low).	post-op 12 weeks
The grade of compliance of post-operative rehabilitation	The compliance of post-operative rehabilitation was evaluated not only from patients' self-reported logs but also by physicians at post-operatively 24 weeks. For patients, the log recorded the grade of home-exercise frequency as "high" (exercise 5-7 days per week), "intermediate" (exercise 2-4 days per week) and "low" (exercise 0-1 day per week). In the clinics, physicians questioned patients about the rehab-principle, activity, and frequency to assess of the compliance of doing home-exercise in three grades (high, intermediate, and low).	post-op 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
• Investigators: Study Director: Linda Lin, PhD, Institute of Physical education, Health & Leisure Studies, National Cheng Kung University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
• Holmgren T, Oberg B, Sjoberg I, Johansson K. Supervised strengthening exercises versus home-based movement exercises after arthroscopic acromioplasty: a randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Jan;44(1):12-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0889.
• Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone JA, Thompson DR, Oldridge N. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):682-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009.
• Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Burkhart SS. Prevention and management of stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: systematic review and implications for rotator cuff healing. Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.013.
• Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, Leggin BG, Williams GR, Wilcox RB 3rd. The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):521-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.018.
• Ross D, Maerz T, Lynch J, Norris S, Baker K, Anderson K. Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a review of current literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Jan;22(1):1-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-01-1.
• Ramey L, Osborne C, Kasitinon D, Juengst S. Apps and Mobile Health Technology in Rehabilitation: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 May;30(2):485-497. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
• Pires IM, Marques G, Garcia NM, Florez-Revuelta F, Ponciano V, Oniani S. A Research on the Classification and Applicability of the Mobile Health Applications. J Pers Med. 2020 Feb 27;10(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jpm10010011.
• Alenabi T, Jackson M, Tetreault P, Begon M. Electromyographic activity in the immobilized shoulder musculature during ipsilateral elbow, wrist, and finger movements while wearing a shoulder orthosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
• Cools AM, Dewitte V, Lanszweert F, Notebaert D, Roets A, Soetens B, Cagnie B, Witvrouw EE. Rehabilitation of scapular muscle balance: which exercises to prescribe? Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1744-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546507303560. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
• Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR. Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 May-Jun;14(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009.
• Buker N, Akkaya S, Akkaya N, Gokalp O, Kavlak E, Ok N, Kiter AE, Kitis A. Comparison of effects of supervised physiotherapy and a standardized home program on functional status in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Oct;26(10):1531-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1531. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
• Grant JA, Mohtadi NG. Two- to 4-year follow-up to a comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1389-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359763. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
• Krischak G, Gebhard F, Reichel H, Friemert B, Schneider F, Fisser C, Kaluscha R, Kraus M. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing occupational therapy with home-based exercises in conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
• Roddey TS, Olson SL, Gartsman GM, Hanten WP, Cook KF. A randomized controlled trial comparing 2 instructional approaches to home exercise instruction following arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Nov;32(11):548-59. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.11.548.
• Lisinski P, Huber J, Wilkosz P, Witkowska A, Wytrazek M, Samborski W, Zagloba A. Supervised versus uncontrolled rehabilitation of patients after rotator cuff repair-clinical and neurophysiological comparative study. Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Jan;35(1):45-54. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000037.
• Song SJ, Jeong TH, Moon JW, Park HV, Lee SY, Koh KH. Short-term Comparison of Supervised Rehabilitation and Home-based Rehabilitation for Earlier Recovery of Shoulder Motion, Pain, and Function after Rotator Cuff Repair. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018 Mar 1;21(1):15-21. doi: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.15. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 22, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): December 31, 2026
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 1, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 1, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): November 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 2, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 1, 2021
• Last Verified: October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Telerehabilitation; Rotator cuff tear; Arthroscopic surgery
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Rupture; Shoulder Injuries; Tendon Injuries; Rotator Cuff Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: VGHKS 18-CT12-15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: IPD will not be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No