The Patient Expectation in Dry Needling and Analgesia

August 14, 2019 updated by: Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala

The Influence of Patient Expectation in Dry Needling Induced Analgesia

This study will evaluate placebo mechanisms related to dry needling(DN) trying to determinate whether an additive effect occurs when DN is provided with an instructional set known to enhance placebo analgesia. External manipulation of patient expectation for receiving DN will be performed, in a similar way as has been already done in studies investigating the influence of expectation on spinal manipulative therapy interventions. The main purpose of this study will be therefore to determine, for the first time, how subjects' expectation about the effect of DN influences the resultant hypoalgesia. Analgesic effects of DN will be assessed using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, which has not been previously evaluated in relation to DN.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Just before DN intervention, participants will receive a positive or a neutral expectation instructional set regarding effects of a DN technique on pain perception. This instructional set will be randomly allocated to each patient.

Participants in the positive expectation group will be told that DN procedure: "is a very effective form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain and it is expected to reduce your perception of pressure pain". Participants in the neutral expectation group will be told that DN procedure: "is a form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain that has unknown effects on your perception of pressure pain".

DN intervention An experienced and trained physical therapist will provide DN to all the subjects. This researcher will be blinded to the specific expectation instructional set the participant receives. Participants will receive one session of DN treatment for the active Myofascial Trigger Points(MTrP) located at the upper trapezius muscle. They will be placed in a prone position on the examination table. Solid filament needles of 0.30 mm diameter and 40 mm length will be used. The needle will be inserted into the skin over the palpated MTrP using pincer palpation, and slowly advanced perpendicularly until it reaches the MTrP and a twitch response is elicited.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28871
        • Grupo Fisioterapia y Dolor
      • Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Institut Physiotherapy AND pain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • neck pain (≥3 months of duration)
  • VAS of 4-5 of pain.
  • Presence of at least one active MTrP located at the upper trapezius.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous cervical spine or shoulder surgery.
  • Cervical spine radiculopathy or myelopathy.
  • Systemic disease.
  • Fibromyalgia.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Using sedative drugs.
  • Needle phobia.
  • Bleeding disorder.
  • anticoagulant medication.
  • Previous experience with DN for myofascial pain.
  • Skin lesion and infection or inflammatory oedema at the MTrPs site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Positive expectative
Participants in the positive expectation group will be told that DN procedure: "is a very effective form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain and it is expected to reduce your perception of pressure pain"
DN procedure: "is a very effective form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain and it is expected to reduce your perception of pressure pain"
Experimental: Neutral expectatives
Participants in the neutral expectation group will be told that DN procedure: "is a form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain that has unknown effects on your perception of pressure pain"
DN procedure: "is a form of treatment used to treat neck-shoulder pain that has unknown effects on your perception of pressure pain"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at after intervention
The investigators use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the intensity of the patient's current pain before, during DN and immediately after DN. We will follow the paradigm of Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. CPM will be induced by inflating an occlusion cuff (conditioning stimulus) at the arm, at the opposite side from the affected upper trapezius.The VAS is a 100-mm line, oriented horizontally, with one end representing "no pain"(the best value) and the other end representing "worst pain" (the worse value). Subjects will be asked to rate their current pain with a mark on the scale.
Change from Baseline at after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Change up 1 hour

The PPT serves to determine the sensitivity of hiperalgesic focus. The investigators will done it with one algometer.

Lower values are a worse result. Higher values are a better result.

Change up 1 hour
Dry needling pain
Time Frame: Change up 1 hour
The investigators use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the intensity of the patient's pain during DN intervention.The VAS is a 100-mm line, oriented horizontally, with one end representing "no pain" (the best value) and the other end representing "worst pain" (the worse value). Subjects will be asked to rate their current dry needling pain with a mark on the scale.
Change up 1 hour
Dry needling anxiety
Time Frame: Change up 1 hour
The investigators use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the anxiety of the patient during DN.The VAS is a 100-mm line, oriented horizontally, with one end representing "no anxiety"(the best value) and the other end representing "worst anxiety"(the worse value). Subjects were asked to rate their current dry needling anxiety with a mark on the scale
Change up 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEI18/087

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The IDP does not exist

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dry needling with positives expectation

3
Subscribe