Activity Monitor Feedback and Interactive Tours to Improve Postoperative Ambulation

March 27, 2019 updated by: Timothy J. Daskivich, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Randomized Controlled Trial of Activity Monitor Feedback and Interactive Ambulation Tours to Improve Postoperative Ambulation and Efficiency Outcomes After Major Surgery

This is a randomized controlled trial that compares a system using activity monitors to provide real-time feedback on daily ambulation to patients undergoing major surgeries, paired with step-count-measured art tours of the surgical units, versus standard of care, on step count. The hypothesis is that the feedback system + art tours will encourage patients to ambulate more.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

After major surgery, patients are encouraged to walk early and often, since early ambulation is linked with improved clinical and efficiency outcomes. This research study tests whether providing goal-directed feedback on daily ambulation to patients using activity monitors in combination with an app that provides step count-rated "art tours" of the surgical floors will increase the amount of steps taken after surgery. Upon enrollment, all patients will be assigned to either the control (no intervention) or experimental (activity monitor feedback + art tours) group, stratified by surgery type. This randomized controlled trial aims to determine if this feedback system/art tours approach improves: (1) daily step count, (2) length of stay, and (3) patient satisfaction compared with standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

192

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Recruiting
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Mayra L Lopez, MPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing one of the 14 surgeries: Gynecological (Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Gyn Ex Lap); Orthopedic (Total Hip Replacement, Total Knee Replacement); Minimally Invasive Surgery (Hiatal Hernia Repair/Fundoplication, Gastric Bypass, Gastric Sleeve); Colorectal Surgery (Lap/Robotic Colectomy, Ileocolic Resection, Open Colectomy); Thoracic (Lung Lobectomy); Urologic (Robotic Cystectomy, Radical Prostatectomy, Partial Nephrectomy).
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Non-English speakers will be included with the use of short forms in the 7 available languages
  • Must have access to an IOS or Android device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide consent
  • Not undergoing procedure of interest
  • Admitted to ICU directly after operation (except esophagectomy, where all patients are admitted to ICU directly after the operation)
  • Use of walker, cane, or wheelchair at baseline
  • Presence of physical limitations on walking (i.e. amputation)
  • Usual place of residence is skilled nursing facility
  • Cognitive inability to follow directions to maintain activity monitor in place
  • Unable to place activity monitor on patient's wrist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Intervention: Activity monitor feedback loop: (1) Subjects will receive activity monitor with feedback on daily step count from the in-room TV screen, and (2) access to the Art Tour application
The intervention arm will test if the feedback system (i.e., activity monitor, real-time feedback, and art tours) increases daily step count, decreases length of stay, and improves patient and provider communication, patient awareness of step count goals, and patient confidence in accomplishment of daily goals.
No Intervention: Standard-of-care Arm
Subjects in the control arm will receive a "blinded" activity monitor post-op (without feedback on step count) and the usual standard of care. Nurses and doctors will not monitor ambulation with the activity monitor, they will use standard methods of observation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Step Count
Time Frame: During hospitalization within approximately 1-2 weeks
Daily step count will be captured with activity monitor
During hospitalization within approximately 1-2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: Within approximately 1-2 weeks, Date patient was admitted through hospital discharge
Length of stay in intervention arm compared to control
Within approximately 1-2 weeks, Date patient was admitted through hospital discharge
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Within approximately 1-2 weeks, Day patient is discharged from hospital

Patient satisfaction measured using likert-scale rated items. Scale measures patient/physician communication, patient awareness of step goals, and patient confidence in accomplishment of daily goals. The following scale ranges will be used:

  1. Never, Once a day, Twice a day, Three times a day, More than three times a day
  2. Much lower, Lower, About the same, Higher, Much higher
  3. Not at all, Slightly, Moderately, Very, Extremely

Positive answer in likert-scales indicate higher patient/physician communication, patient awareness, and patient confidence in accomplishing daily step goals.

Within approximately 1-2 weeks, Day patient is discharged from hospital

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Daskivich, MD, MSHPM, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 22, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00051802

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Activity monitor feedback loop

Subscribe