Comparison of Two Forms of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Overactive Bladder

November 12, 2018 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Comparison of Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation With Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Women With Overactive Bladder: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Aim: To compare the effects of parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation with transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation on the symptoms of Overactive Bladder in women.

Study's hypothesis: The use of the parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation technique presents better results regarding the remission of overactive bladder symptoms in relation to transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Search location: The data will collected at the Ambulatory of Urogynecology and Obstetrics of Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital (HCPA), where the activities of Pelvic Physiotherapy are performed

Main outcome: to measure changes in urinary urgency and quality of life.

Secondary outcome: to measure changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and the symptom bother.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Suzana Mallmann
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • José Geraldo Lopes Ramos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of overactive bladder with or without the presence of urinary incontinence.
  • Understand the instruments used in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urinary tract infection
  • Neurological disease
  • Other previous treatment in the last four weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Parasacral
Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Group: participants in this group will receive two self-adhesive electrodes and will be instructed to position them in the sacral region. Current parameters will be: 10 hertz frequency, 700μs wavelength, 20 minute therapy duration, 3x frequency in the week. The treatment will be at home for 6 weeks.
Electrical stimulation with surface electrodes on the sacral roots of S3 that produce inferior urinary tract neuromodulation.
Active Comparator: Posterior Tibial Nerve
Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation Group: participants in this group will receive a neoprene ankle brace that will be connected to the electrostimulator. Current parameters will be: 10 hertz frequency, 700μs wavelength, 20 minute therapy duration, 3x frequency in the week. The treatment will be at home for 6 weeks.
Electrical stimulation with surface electrodes through the activation of peripheral afferent nerves that produce inferior urinary tract neuromodulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of treatment in quality of life
Time Frame: six weeks
Application of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ). KHQ is an instrument for measuring quality of life in people diagnosed with urinary incontinence, consisting of 30 objective questions distributed in 9 domains. In each question, values are assigned according to the intensity of the patient's complaint (0 = not applicable, 1 = no; 2 = a little / sometimes, 3 = more or less / several times, 4 = a lot / always). The final score is calculated individually for each domain and ranges from 0 to 100, the highest score being related to a poorer quality of life.
six weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of urinary incontinence
Time Frame: six weeks
Application of the Incontinence Severity Index. It is a brief instrument, consisting of two questions regarding the frequency and amount of urinary loss. The final score obtained by multiplying the frequency scores by the amount of urinary loss allows the incontinence urinary to be classified as mild (final score 1-2), moderate (final score 3-6 ), severe (final score 8-9) and very severe (final score 12).
six weeks
Severity of overactive bladder symptoms
Time Frame: six weeks
Application of the Symptom Bother Scale. It instrument asks how bothered the patient is by the 4 hallmark symptoms of overactive bladder: urinary frequency, urgency, nocturia, and urge incontinence. Patients respond on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 5 (a very great deal), with a maximum possible score of 40, calculated by adding all responses.
six weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose Geraldo Lopes Ramos, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation

Subscribe