Improving Mobility and Reducing Fatigue in People With Multiple Sclerosis by Electrical Stimulation Therapy

November 4, 2020 updated by: Roger Enoka, University of Colorado, Boulder
The objective of the clinical trial is to quantify the capacity of a translatable protocol of electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to improve walking performance and self-reported disabilities of persons with MS. The hypothesis is that activation of sensory nerve fibers with augmented TENS promotes recovery of sensorimotor function and improves the disability status of individuals with MS. The rationale for the proposed clinical trial is that the approach provides a low-cost therapeutic strategy for persons with MS to manage walking limitations and fatigue.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will involve a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Randomization will be accomplished by recruiting two individuals with a similar level of disability at a time and flipping a coin (two persons present) to determine the group assignment (A or B) of the person who contacted the investigators first. The participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. Both groups will receive the treatment (real or sham) during the first 4 weeks (3 sessions/week)and then there will be an 8-week follow-up period. Participants will be evaluated at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to read, write, and speak English to ensure safe participation in the project
  • Clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • Mild-to-moderate level of disability
  • On stable doses of symptom-treating medications
  • No MS exacerbations within the last 30 day
  • Healthy enough to complete the protocol as indicated by the absence of a medical diagnosis or condition that is considered to be an absolute or relative contraindication to participating in tests that involve electrical nerve stimulation (e.g., not implanted devices or internal metal)
  • Able to arrange own transportation to Boulder campus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented MS-related relapse within the last 30 days
  • Medical diagnosis or condition that is considered to be a contraindication to participating in the intervention, such as major renal, pulmonary, hepatic, cardiac, gastrointestinal, HIV, cancer (other than basal cell cancer), other neurological disorders, or pregnancy.
  • Vestibular disorder
  • Musculoskeletal disorder
  • History of seizure disorders
  • >2 alcoholic drinks/day,or present history (last 6 months) of drug abuse
  • Spasticity that requires the individual to change an activity more than once a week
  • Skin disease or sensation problems in the legs or hands that influence some activities more than once a week
  • Claustrophobia
  • Metallic implants
  • Inability to attend treatment sessions 3 days per week for 6 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Augmented TENS
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied to each leg separately while participants perform steady submaximal contractions.
Commercially available device will be used to apply weak electrical currents to arm and leg muscles in each of 18 treatment sessions.
Other Names:
  • Sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham
Transient (10 s) application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied to each leg separately while participants perform steady submaximal contractions .
Commercially available device will be used to apply weak electrical currents to arm and leg muscles in each of 18 treatment sessions.
Other Names:
  • Sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Time to walk 25 ft as quickly as possible
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in Walking Endurance
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Distance walked in 6 min when walking at a brisk pace
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change in Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Score achieved on the four components of the 14-item Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). The maximum score for each subscale are: anticipatory = 6, reactive postural control = 6, sensory orientation = 6, dynamic gait = 10. The subscales are added to provide a total score with a maximum of 28.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change in Patient Determined Disease Steps
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
A questionnaire with a self-assessment scale of disease status. The scores range from 0 = normal to 8 = bedridden.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
A questionnaire that assesses the impact of fatigue experienced by persons with MS. Each of the 21 items is rated from 0 = Never to 5 = Almost always. The maximum total score = 105
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in MS Walking Scale-12
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
A 12-item, patient-rated measure of how much MS compromises walking ability. Each item is rated from 1 = Not at all to 5 = extremely. The maximum total score = 60.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Romberg Quotient
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Ratio of the total sway area when standing with the eyes closed relative to that when the eyes are open. The test will be performed while standing on a firm surface and a foam surface.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change Conditioned H-reflex Amplitude
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Comparison of the percent reduction in the amplitude of the conditioned H-reflex amplitude in soleus while seated, standing with eyes open, and standing with eyes closed.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in Proprioception Tract
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in MRI signal intensity in corticospinal tract
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in Muscle Synergy Number
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Non-negative matrix factorization will be used to identify the number of muscle synergies when subjects walk on a treadmill.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change in Force Steadiness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
The coefficient of variation for force when subjects perform steady, submaximal contractions.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in Muscle Synergy TIming
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
The timing of the muscle synergies when subjects walk on a treadmill.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Change in Discharge characteristics
Time Frame: Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
The mean and coefficient of variation for the times between action potentials during steady isometric contractions.
Change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roger Enoka, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share the data obtained by individual participants.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

3
Subscribe