Efficacy of Different Electrical Stimulation Placement in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome

May 14, 2018 updated by: Yeh, Chung Shan Medical University

Randomized,Single-Blind Controlled Trial

This experiment is expected to understand the benefits of different settings of electrical stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This experiment is expected to understand the benefits of different settings of electrical stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder.The study will adopt a longitudinal research design with randomized quasi-experimental trial.The patients will recruited and be randomly assigned to Group A (Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation) or Group B (Intravaginal electrical stimulation). There will be 30 participants in each group. Data will be collected 2 times.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40201
        • Recruiting
        • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity
  • No patients had been taking anticholinergics or tricyclic depressants and none had been treated by pelvic floor exercise, bladder training, or pelvic surgery before entry into the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • stress incontinence
  • urinary tract infection
  • neurological disease
  • genital prolapse higher than stage II on POP-Q system
  • pregnancy
  • diabetes mellitus
  • a history of anti-incontinence surgery and/or prolapse repair
  • pelvic tumors and previously treated with radiation therapy or antimuscarinic agents
  • patients who were not cooperative
  • electrical stimulation contraindications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Parasacral transcutaneous ES
20min./session, 2 sessions/week ,12 sessions of Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
Asymmetrical biphasic square current pulse Frequency:10 Hz pulse width:1.0 ms Intensity:highest tolerable intensity(≦80 mA.) Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation:Clinic using 2 superficial 3.5 cm electrodes placed on each side of S3 and S4.
Active Comparator: Intravaginal electrical stimulation
20min./session, 2 sessions/week ,12 sessions of Intravaginal electrical stimulation.
Asymmetrical biphasic square current pulse Frequency:10 Hz pulse width:1.0 ms Intensity:highest tolerable intensity(≦80 mA.) Intravaginal electrical stimulation:The electrode plug for vaginal plug was cylinder-formed with ring-formed placed into vaginal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3 Days Voiding diary
Time Frame: 3 days
This chart is a record of your voiding and leakage or urine. Choose three (3) separate 24 hour periods to complete this record. Pick days which will be most convenient for you to measure every void.
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score( OABSS)
Time Frame: 20 min
This is a single symptom score that employs a self-report questionnaire to quantify OAB symptoms.Questionnaire has many items with the same minimum and maximum score.Four question items, daytime frequency, nocturia, urgency and urgency incontinence, were included in the questionnaire according to the definition of OAB.
20 min
minVisual analogue scale (VAS) for urgency
Time Frame: 10 min
The Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of urgency they experienced. This gives them the greatest freedom to choose their urgency intensity. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. VAS data of this type is recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line with the range 0-100.
10 min
Pad test
Time Frame: 20min-1hr
To measure leakage and may be performed in the specialist's office or at home. Pad testing can be done over a period of time as short as twenty minutes or up to one hour.
20min-1hr

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Chen Gin-Den, PhD, Chung Shan Medical University
  • Study Director: Chen Yi-Ching, MS, Chung Shan Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Chang Chia-Yun, MS student, Chung Shan Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Subscribe