The Right Treatment for the Right Patient At the Right Time. a Study Following 5,000 Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis (TREATright)

October 1, 2024 updated by: Anders Troelsen, Hvidovre University Hospital

The Right Treatment for the Right Patient At the Right Time - a Prospective Cohort Study of 5,000 Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

The treatment that patients with knee OA are offered varies largely. There is a need for more evidence-based individualized guidance to treatment choice for knee osteoarthritis. This study will register and evaluate the course and outcome of treatment in 5,000 patients with knee osteoarthritis. The understanding of knee OA treatment will advance in three ways: Firstly, by describing the different treatment pathways that are currently being used for knee OA. Secondly, by identifying wich individual factors that may impact the outcome of the treatment course. And finally, by conducting the economic burden related to different treatment modalities.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The problem: Knee Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis, is a chronic, widespread disease with a steadily increasing prevalence that places a major economic burden on the society. Patients with knee OA suffer from chronic knee pain and functional disabilities. The treatment that patients with knee OA are offered varies largely, and is often not in coherence with clinical guidelines. The guidelines recommend patient education, exercise, and weight control as core interventions for all patients with knee OA and surgical intervention for end-stage knee OA. However, the timing of surgery is debated, and whether the outcome of different treatment strategies depend on individual factors such as the patients symptoms, OA severity, or prior treatment, has not been established.

The solution: This large-scale study aims at improving the understanding of which treatment should be offered to which patient with knee OA at which time. The study is an interdisciplinary, collaborative effort, including orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists and general practitioners from two different regions in Denmark. At least 5,000 patients with primary referrals to orthopaedic surgeons due to knee OA, at two public hospitals, will be recruited through a two-year inclusion period. Patients' prior treatment and symptom severity will be registered at the first consultation with the orthopaedic surgeon using a patient self-reported questionnaire. OA severity will be defined on plain standing knee radiographs using a well-established classification system. The course of treatment will be registered after 6 months and 2 years through a self-reported questionnaire with additional questions asking whether patients can accept their current symptom state, or, if not, whether they consider the treatment to have failed.

Societal impact and clinical implications: The understanding of knee OA treatment will advance in three ways: Firstly, our results will improve the overview by describing the different treatment pathways that are currently being used for knee OA. Secondly, predictors of good and poor treatment outcomes of different treatment modalities, or combinations hereof will be identified. And finally, the cost-effectiveness of different treatment modalities will be evaluated. These results will be used to develop a treatment algorithm to help patients with knee OA and clinicians to tailor the right treatment at the right time through shared decision-making.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with primary referrals to one of two public hospitals orthopedic department's outpatient clinics due to knee osteoarthritis are consecutively invited to participate. The two hospitals cover the larger part of Zealand in Denmark.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary referrals to one of two orthopedic department's outpatient clinics due to knee osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous total or unicompartmental knee replacement
  • osteotomy around the study knee
  • unable to read or write Danish
  • patients who decline to answer the questionnaire at inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Knee osteoarthritis
Treatment course
Pursued treatment for knee OA, including type of health care provider, time period of treatment course, and types of treatments received, will be recorded via the patient-reported questionnaire.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: 2 years after inclusion
Patients answer yes/no to a PASS question asking whether they consider the current symptom state to be acceptable.
2 years after inclusion
Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 2 years after inclusion
Patients who answer "no" to the PASS question will also answer "yes/no" to a question about whether they consider the treatment received to have failed.
2 years after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: 6 months after inclusion
Patients answer yes/no to a PASS question asking whether they consider the current symptom state to be acceptable.
6 months after inclusion
Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 6 months after inclusion
Patients who answer "no" to the PASS question will also answer "yes/no" to a question about whether they consider the treatment received to have failed.
6 months after inclusion
Minimal Important Change
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years after inclusion
An anchor question asking about the degree and importance of change in knee-pain and function will be answered on a 7-level Likert scale ranging from better, an important improvement to worse, an important deterioration.
6 months and 2 years after inclusion
Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range from 0 (worst) to 48 (best)
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years after inclusion
Patient self-reported average knee pain and function during the past four weeks calculated from a validated 12-item questionnaire.
6 months and 2 years after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Anders Troelsen, Professor, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Lina H Ingelsrud, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Henrik M Schroeder, Asst. Prof., Næstved Sygehus, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Søren T Skou, Assoc. Prof., Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals AND University of Southern Denmark
  • Study Chair: Thomas Bandholm, Professor, University of Copenhagen AND Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Jakob Kjellberg, Professor, VIVE - The Danish Centre of Applied Social Science, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Susanne Reventlow, Professor, University of Copenhagen
  • Study Chair: Anne Møller, Asst. Prof., University of Copenhagen
  • Study Chair: Simon M Bruhn, M.Sc., Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CAGROAD_TREATright_2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Decision in pending on whether the total database with all anonymised data will be transferred to the Danish National Archives' Collections once the study is completed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Treatment course

Subscribe