Reduction of Opioid Dose Using Conditioning & Open-Label Placebo (COLP) in Intensive Rehabilitation (COLP)

July 9, 2026 updated by: Jorge Leon Morales-Quezada, MD, PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Reduction of Opioid Dose Using Conditioning & Open-Label Placebo (COLP) in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury, Polytrauma and Burn Injury: A Pilot Study

The use of conditioning open-label placebo (COLP) will be studied as a dose extension method to lower opioid dosage in patients with spinal cord injury, polytrauma, and burn injury. The goal is to provide the same level of pain relief with a reduced opioid dose to diminish adverse effects as well as the risk of addiction associated with narcotic treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct an assessor blind controlled clinical trial, participants in the COLP group will be fully informed about the interventions the participants will be allocated for. As this study is designed to be a proof-of-concept, only an authorized member of the study staff will be conducting the assessments. Suppose the subject has been approved to participate by the treating physician. In that case, the co-investigator will discuss the study's details and answer questions both before and during the first study visit.

Study Design and Flow:

This study contains one experimental arm and one control group. The experiment will run in a parallel design, with each subject having six days of participation. Each group will have evaluations before starting the trial (Baseline) and assessments after the six days of study participation. Subjects will be evaluated using the following tools: Morphine Equivalent Dose Conversion (MEDC); Modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life measurement system (SCI-QOL); and Numerical Opioid Side Effects (NOSE). The investigators will also record medication changes, side effects, and pain levels as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) daily for each patient.

For this open placebo- opioid dose reduction study. The investigators will enroll a total of 60 subjects with SCI, polytrauma, and burn injury patients from the Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and ongoing neuropathic or nociceptive pain. Experimental treatments will take place at either Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (SRH). The investigators will coordinate with the appropriate care outlets to ensure that the study's procedures will not interfere with their standard of care at Spaulding. This includes, but is not limited to: physicians, therapists, and nurses working with the patient. The investigators will schedule inpatients as their clinical schedule allows.

After enrollment, subjects will be randomized to receive COLP treatment or to receive standardized opioid dosage.

Oxycodone Intervention and Rescue Medication:

All patients enrolled in this study will receive oxycodone as primary opioid medication for pain control. The treating physician will prescribe a short-acting form of oxycodone 3-4 times per day. The accepted range dosage for this medication will be from 10 to 50 mg PO per day (Q24H), treating physicians will decide the oxycodone dosage to control pain effectively. The investigators expect patients enrolled in this study to take an average of 30-40 mg of oxycodone per day (Q24H).

If a subject requires rescue medication, it will be determined by clinical staff.

Baseline assessments will be performed by the investigators. Subjects on the COLP group will undergo three consecutive days of opioid conditioning paired with taste and odorous placebos (pill and smell), followed by three days of the evoked response phase, where the active opioid medication will be alternated with full placebo dosages to decrease the therapeutic opioid dose by 50%. Females of childbearing age-eligible to participate in the study will be tested for pregnancy using a serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test.

The treatment regime and schedule for patients in the COLP group will include a short-acting opioid prescribed on a program of 3-4 times per day. This will be considered the active agent for the pharmaco-conditioning intervention; subjects will have access and receive rescue medication if necessary (PRN). Other forms of analgesics (NSAIDs and combos) will be prescribed under the criteria of treating physicians; if combined agents containing opiates are used, a morphine equivalence calculation will be applied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18 or older with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (ASIA A-D) polytrauma or burn injury patients from the Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital,
  • SCI, polytrauma or burn injury patients from the Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and pain of no more 5 years of evolution,
  • Patients admitted to the Spaulding Comprehensive Rehabilitation Unit at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital,
  • Who have; above, at, or sub-lesional neuropathic pain and/or nociceptive pain (musculoskeletal or visceral) that is moderate or severe in nature (average VAS scale score of 4 or greater at time of enrollment),
  • Respiratory and hemodynamically stable,
  • With current narcotic use for pain control,
  • Narcotic usage of no more than 120 mg of morphine equivalent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of alcohol or drug dependence, as self-reported,
  • A history of bipolar disorder or psychosis, as self-reported,
  • Any substantial decrease in alertness, language reception, or attention that might interfere with understanding,
  • Current usage of narcotic medication with dosage higher than 120 mg of morphine equivalent or 80 mg of a short-acting oxycodone,
  • Current use of ventilator,
  • Compromised medical status due to uncontrolled pathology such as cancer, heart failure, kidney or liver insufficiency, or any other condition which jeopardises patient's participation to the study
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Females in childbearing age who are eligible to participate in the study, will be tested for pregnancy by serum hCG test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conditioning & Open-Label Placebo (COLP)
Days 1 to 3 will include the acquisition phase where oxycodone will be prescribed on a schedule of 3-4 times per day and paired with open-placebo and smelling the essential oil. Days 4 to 6 will be the evoked phase, and patients will receive full oxycodone dosage on alternating days with open placebo and smelling the essential oil.
Sugar pill used to condition patients.
An opioid used for analgesia.
Other Names:
  • Oxycodone Hydrochloride Tablets
An aromatic oil used for conditioning.
Other: Treatment-as-usual
For the duration of the study, days 1 to 6, oxycodone will be prescribed on a schedule of 3-4 times per day.
An opioid used for analgesia.
Other Names:
  • Oxycodone Hydrochloride Tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)
Time Frame: 6 days
Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) are used to standardize opioid exposure by expressing the analgesic potency of different opioids relative to morphine. MME is calculated by multiplying the prescribed opioid dose by the daily frequency of administration and then by an opioid-specific conversion factor. The resulting value is expressed as milligrams of morphine equivalents (mg MME). Values range from 0 mg MME upward, with higher values indicating greater opioid exposure, which has been associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
6 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 6
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a measurement tool used to quantify pain intensity. It consists of a 10-point anchored by a minimum value of 0, representing "no pain," and a maximum value of 10, representing the "worst pain imaginable." Patients mark their perceived pain level; higher scores indicate a worse outcome, reflecting greater pain severity or distress. For this outcome, we are reporting the difference in VAS from Day 1 to Day 6.
Day 6
Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Measurement System (SCI-QOL)
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 6
This measurement system was developed to address the shortage of relevant and psychometrically sound patient reported outcome measures available for clinical care and research in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. For the purpose of this research, the Pain Behavior subdomain will be the primary component of this scale to be used. This 7-item fixed-length scale measures manifestations of pain. These actions or reactions can be verbal or non-verbal and involuntary or deliberate. They include observable displays, and verbal reports of pain. This scale includes a small subset of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ) Pain Behavior item bank (i = 4) and three new items.
Day 1 and Day 6
Numerical Opioid Side Effects (NOSE)
Time Frame: Change in NOSE score from Day 1 and Day 6
The Numerical Opioid Side Effect (NOSE) assessment tool is a simple, rapid, self-administered instrument to document and longitudinally follow trends of opioid adverse effects. The NOSE typically assesses 10 common, specific opioid side effects, including nausea, fatigue/drowsiness, constipation, itching, decreased libido, dry mouth, abdominal pain, sweating, dizziness, and urinary retention, with each item rated on this 0-10 scale. Higher values on the NOSE scale represent worst side effects Minimum Score: 0 (indicates no problems with opioid side-effects) Maximum Score: 100 (indicates the worst possible opioids side-effects) The reported outcome is the change in NOSE from Day 1(baseline) to Day 6(post-intervention)
Change in NOSE score from Day 1 and Day 6
Electroencephalography - Power Spectrum
Time Frame: Power spectrum Change from Day 1 to Day 6
Electroencephalography (EEG) is an electrophysiological monitoring method to record the electrical activity of the brain. Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) stands out as a valuable, non-invasive tool because it provides reliable and relevant information about brain functioning during rest, sensory stimulation, and cognitive tasks. Besides, this technique is safe, low-cost, and employs a straightforward methodology, making it an appropriate tool for clinical practice. The EEG recordings will be processed for analytical purposes by the investigators will explore standard EEG metrics (e.g., spectral analysis).
Power spectrum Change from Day 1 to Day 6
Near-infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 6

NIRS is a spectroscopic method that uses the near-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum. This method is based on near-infrared light absorption fluctuations that depend on concentration changes of the chromophores oxygenated hemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb).

The values are usually expressed in micromolar units (mM) of concentration change relative to a baseline. The higher the O2Hb value, represents higher cortical activity. Higher HHb represents decreased cortical activity.

The outcome is reported as the change O2Hb and HHb from Day 1(baseline) to Day 6 (post-intervention)

Day 1 and Day 6
Metabolomics Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 6. This outcome measure data represents the change in metabolite concentration from Day 1 (baseline) to Day 6(post-intervention)

Metabolomics is the large-scale study of small molecules. The analysis will focus on pathways associated with cognitive and cellular metabolism. The investigators will collect samples by pinprick system, and analysis will be done using liquid chromatography (LC) technique and by employing Electrochemical Array Detection (ECA). Concentration of metabolites will be reported and used for analysis using the absolute quantification value in (micromolar).

This outcome measure data represents the change in metabolite concentration from baseline to post-intervention.

Day 1 and Day 6. This outcome measure data represents the change in metabolite concentration from Day 1 (baseline) to Day 6(post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ross D Zafonte, DO, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe