Using Decision Aids to Reducing Decision Conflict in Angiography Patients for Choosing Hemostasis (N201902036)

September 17, 2019 updated by: Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Using Decision Aids to Reducing Decision Conflict in Angiography Patients for Choosing Hemostasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vascular closure device, hemostatic bandage and manual compression can achieve hemostasis after angiographic examination. These three methods of hemostasis changed the rate of hemostasis, early ambulation, hematoma , hemostasis failure rate, and expense. Therefore, shared decision making (SDM) is necessary to aid patients to choose hemostasis.The investigators have developed a decision aids (DA) and planned a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate its impact on angiographic patients. The measurements include a battery of interview-based questionnaires and evaluations of decision conflicts. The investigators expect the DAs would benefit the intervention group in the aspects of knowledge, communication and choice conflicts.during and after thier Hemostasis procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who needs an angiographic examination or treatment.
  • Patients with angiographic indications
  • Patients who were able to give consent and complete the interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The angiographic procedure uses patients with a catheter size more than 7fr.
  • Patients in critical situations requiring urgent treatment
  • Patients had cognitive impairment
  • Patients were physically unfit to be interviewed
  • Patients were non-Mandarin or -Taiwanese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DAs group
Shared decision making using decision aids
Other: Decision aids
Shared decision making with decision aids
No Intervention: Control group
Standard oral explanation guided with booklets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional conflict
Time Frame: 1 hour before Angiography
Total score of decisional conflict scale
1 hour before Angiography

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N201902036

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Haemostatic Adverse Reaction

Clinical Trials on Decision aids

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Cameroon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe