Impact of Decision Aids on Breast Cancer Surgery Choice: A Randomized Controlled Trial

March 16, 2020 updated by: Ka-Wai Tam, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Both simple mastectomy and breast conservation therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy yield similar survival rates in breast cancer. These two treatment strategies have diverted cosmetic outcome and convenience. Thus, shared decision making (SDM) is necessary to aid patients to choose an appropriate treatment that suits thier needs. We have developed a decision aids (DAs) and plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate its impact on cancer patients. The measurements include a battery of interview-based questionnaires and evaluations of decision regret and postsurgical depression. We expect the DAs would benefit the intervention group in the aspects of knowledge, communication and anxiety status during and after thier treatment sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

For women with early-stage breast cancer, both simple mastectomy and breast conservation therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy yield similar survival rates, making psychological adjustment and quality-of-life issues pivotal in treatment choice. Using decision aids (DAs) is one way to provide information to patients and to involve them in making decisions about their treatment. We have developed a DAs to be administered after consultation for Taiwanese women deciding on breast surgery, and plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the benefit of DAs on breast surgery decision making.

Patients and Methods:

Decision aids are interventions designed to help patients with early breast cancer to make deliberate choices among treatment options by providing information on those options and any potential outcome relevant to different breast cancer surgeries. Women considering breast cancer surgery are randomly assigned to receive a DAs or the standard oral conversation (control condition) after initial consultation, wherein surgeons disclosed the diagnosis and discussed treatment options with patients. Participants complete interview-based questionnaires 1 day before and 4 weeks after surgery. Primary outcome measures 1 day before surgery are decisional conflict and decision-making difficulties after consultation. Secondary outcomes are decision regret and postsurgical depression 1 month after surgery.

Hypothesis:

The DAs group are predicted to lower decisional conflict scores before surgery, and lower decision regret scores and depression scores 1 month after surgery compared with women in the control arm. Our study hopes to support the efficacy of DAs in helping breast cancer women to arrive at their breast surgery decision.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Taiwanese women newly diagnosed with stage 0 to 3 breast cancer (including patients with ductal carcinoma in situ), who were suitable for breast surgery
  • Patients who were able to give consent and complete the interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were diagnosed with nonmalignant breast disease
  • Patients were offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Patients had cognitive impairment
  • Patients were physically unfit to be interviewed
  • Patients were non-Mandarin or -Taiwanese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DAs group
Shared decision making using decision aids
Shared decision making with decision aids
No Intervention: Control group
Standard oral explanation guided with booklets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional conflict
Time Frame: 1 day before surgery
Total score of decisional conflict scale
1 day before surgery
Knowledge
Time Frame: 1 day before surgery
Total score on knowledge scale
1 day before surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision regret
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
Total score of decision regret
4 weeks after surgery
Postsurgical depression
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
Total score of Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
4 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shared Decision Making Resource Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • W105HHC-07

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Decision aids

3
Subscribe