Using an APP in Post Oral Cancer Surgery to Affect Patients' Needs and Quality of Life.

August 7, 2019 updated by: Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

This study aimed to explore using an APP in post oral cancer surgery to affect patients' needs and quality of life.

Methods Quasi-experimental Research Design used purposeful sampling from January 1 to December 31 of the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital oral maxillofacial surgery ward and the otolaryngology ward requirement met post-treatment oral cancer patients who agreed to participate. Self-administered structured questionnaires, including basic personal information, cancer needs table short version (CNQ-SF), head and neck cancer quality of life scale (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), were used to collect information. Results were statistically analyzed to understand the distribution of variables and their relationships.

Scientific or Clinical Implication of the Expected Results Using an APP intervention in post-operative patients with oral cancer may be the better way to promote health and enhance one's quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The malignant tumor has been consecutively ranked as number one of the top ten causes of death over the past 33 years, and the incidence of an increase in oral cancer year by year. The average age of death was 55-57. With this average age compared to other cancer patients under 10 years of early life, it's necessary to care about the burden of disease from oral cancer. The main treatment of oral cancer is surgery and a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients often got severe treatment complications with varying degrees of physical functions and uncertainty due to poor cognition or less clarification in a complex course of treatment that affects medical decisions in the illness process. Both domestic and foreign research show that the majority of oral cancer patients expressed the need for and attention to health information. "Treatment information" was the most needed and important. When information needs are met, it can effectively reduce the anxiety and unease of unknown events. Relevant domestic and foreign research do not provide accessibility and convenience of health education for post-operative patients with oral cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were diagnosed with oral cancer and were the first-time receiving oral cancer surgery within 1 week.
  • Conscious and able o communicate
  • Patients agreed to participate in this study and had a smart phone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without oral cancer
  • Patients with oral cancer but had received oral cancer surgery before 1 week or more.
  • Unconscious or unable to answer questions from questionnaire or APP
  • Patients with cognitive impairment, dementia o intellectual disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Patients in the experimental group were individually assessed by a mobile health application (APP).
The mobile health application (APP) was applied to patients with oral cancer.
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients in the control group were individually assessed by a traditional routine health care and instruction.
Traditional routine health care and instruction was applied to patients with oral cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the subjects' quality of life
Time Frame: 3 month
The Quality of Life scale (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Module [EORTC QLQ-C30] and Head and Neck Module [QLQ-H&N35], or EORTC QLQ-H&N35) was used to represent patients' satisfaction with quality of life. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 30-item self-administered global health and quality of life questionnaire with 5 scales, including physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning. In addition, the measuring items included the pain, swallowing, speech, taste/smell, eating, dry mouth, coughing, opening mouth and social contact and sexuality.
3 month
Changes of the subjects' physiological needs
Time Frame: 3 month
Care Needs Scale (the short-form Cancer Needs Questionnaire, CNQ-SF) was used to measure baseline postoperative care needs, with score 0 meaning no care need and score 100 meaning highest care need. CNQ-SF is a 32-item self-administered questionnaire to evaluate five domains of patient needs, including psychological, health information, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and interpersonal communication needs.
3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the subjects' response to health IT
Time Frame: 3 month
Science and Technology Acceptance Model scale was applied to evaluate patients' response to health IT. The scale measures subjects' intention, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Effectiveness is determined by a panel of experts, including nursing experts, nursing information experts and medical information experts.
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee-Chen Chen, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data is currently under analysis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Cancer

Clinical Trials on Mobile health application (APP)

3
Subscribe