Evaluate the Effectiveness of Self-care Multifaceted Strategy in Heart Failure Patients (IC-CBC)

March 1, 2023 updated by: Hospital do Coracao

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self-care Promotion in Patients With Heart Failure

Study Design: A randomized, multicenter, national, phase II clinical trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of self-care promotion using a multifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS)to patients with heart failure.

Methodological quality:

  • Central randomization with allocation concealment;
  • Decision committee for blind outcome assessment;
  • Intention-to-treat analysis

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design -A randomized, multicenter, national, phase II clinical trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of self-care promotion using a multifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS) to patients with heart failure.

Methodological quality

-Central randomization with allocation concealment; Decision committee for blind outcome assessment; Intention-to-treat analysis

Primary Objective -To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a monitoring, education and self-care strategy to optimize the management of patients with heart failure (HF) after hospital discharge.

Secondary Objectives

-To evaluate, in patients with heart failure, the effect of a self-care promotion program using a multifaceted strategy in comparison to the usual care about acceptability to the application of SMS, patient and / or family satisfaction with care, quality of life scales health scales, self-care scales and knowledge on HF, visual analog scale of dyspnea, and clinical outcomes at 30 and 180 days.

Experimental group:

-Self-care promotion using a multifaceted strategy based on the use of a tele-monitoring device, based on short message system (SMS) messages and self-care teaching tools.

Patients will receive daily messages to optimize self-care in heart failure with the following functions:

  • customized reminders about medication schedules
  • weight and symptoms of decompensation monitoring assessing a decision tree with diuretics adjustment if needed and alerts that define the need to contact a health professional for early intervention before deterioration of the clinical state, identifying situations that require clinical intervention.
  • educational content on heart failure for the patient (symptoms of the disease, healthy habits for HF, warning signs for severity)
  • diary for registration of visits to health services and clinical setting.

Control group:

-Usual outpatient care

Follow-up

  • Follow up will be at least 180 days from the inclusion in the study.
  • Sample size estimation 350 patients per group (700 patients)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

704

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Alexandre B Cavalcanti, MD,PhD
  • Phone Number: +55 11 99882-9343
  • Email: abiasi@hcor.com.br

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
        • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (> 18 years)
  • Heart failure of any etiology
  • Vulnerable period after episode of acute decompensation
  • Cellular telephony acess;
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF <40%),

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac transplant wait list;
  • Surgical or percutaneous (coronary or valvular) treatment at last 3 months
  • HF terminal ;
  • Life expectancy <1 year;
  • Another drug or device study at last 30 days
  • Prior randomization in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: self-care promotion

multifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS) to patients with heart failure.

Press educational content on heart failure for the patient (symptoms of the disease, healthy habits for HF, warning signs for severity).

The text messages are about how the patient should take your drugs (evem diuretics), measure blood pressure and weight in Kg, and about signals and symptoms (shorthbreathness during the night), and about how important is practice physical exercises and don't drink alcohol.

multifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS) to patients with heart failure.

Press educational content on heart failure for the patient (symptoms of the disease, healthy habits for HF, warning signs for severity).

The text messages are about how the patient should take your drugs (evem diuretics), measure blood pressure and weight in Kg, and about signals and symptoms (shorthbreathness during the night), and about how important is practice physical exercises and don't drink alcohol.

Active Comparator: Control group
routinely management in the HF. Press educational content on heart failure for the patient (symptoms of the disease, healthy habits for HF, warning signs for severity)
Educational content on heart failure for the patient (symptoms of the disease, healthy habits for HF, warning signs for severity)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The evaluation of the effect of multifaceted intervention compared to usual outpatient care on the primary endpoint will be performed using the Student's t-Student test of the log ratio of NT-proBNP levels at 6 months baseline.
Time Frame: six months
Variation of NT-proBNP in 180 days;
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall mortality
Time Frame: Six months
Overall mortality for Heart Failure at 180 days
Six months
Overall hospitalization
Time Frame: Six months
Overall hospitalization for Heart Failure at 180 days
Six months
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: Six months
To evaluate cardiovascular mortality in 180 days
Six months
Emergency department visit
Time Frame: Six months
To evaluate emergency department visit in 180 days
Six months
Satisfaction of the patient and / or caregiver with health care
Time Frame: Thirty days
Using (NPS tool):Scale of 0-10 to measure satisfaction of the patient and / or caregiver with health care. Rate it from 0 to 10, where 0 means not at all satisfied and 10 means extremely satisfied.
Thirty days
Acceptability / adherence to the system of sending messages
Time Frame: Six months
Using a Scale of 0-10 (question to insert the note) to measure acceptability / adherence to the system of sending messages. Rate it from 0 to 10, where 0 means no help at all and 10 means the posts were extremely beneficial.
Six months
Variation of NT-proBNP in 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
The evaluation of the effect of multifaceted intervention compared to usual outpatient care on the primary endpoint will be performed using the Student's t-Student test of the log ratio of NT-proBNP levels at 30 days from baseline.
30 days
Kansas Health-related quality of life in baseline, 30 and 180 days
Time Frame: From baseline, 30 and 180 days.
Using (Kansas Health-related quality of life Questionnaire): Scale of 0-100 to measure quality of life in patients with heart failure. Rate it from 0 to 100. Overall score means higher is better.
From baseline, 30 and 180 days.
Variation scale numeric of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) of dyspnea.
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, 90 and 180 days visits
Using Variation scale numeric of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) to measure degree of dyspnea. Rate from 0 to 10, where 0 means no dyspnea and 10 the highest complain of dyspnea.
Baseline, 30, 90 and 180 days visits
European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale - EHFScBs
Time Frame: From 30 and 180 days.
Using (EHFScBs): Scale of 0-60 to to measure self-care behavior of heart failure (HF) patients. Rate it from 0 to 60. Overall score means smaller is better.
From 30 and 180 days.
Heart Failure Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: From 30 and 180 days.
Used to measure Knowledge about Heart Failure. Are by 14 questions more than 70% of correct answers means good Knowledge.
From 30 and 180 days.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Win Ratio Analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
A pre-specified analysis using the win ratio method will be performed. A composite outcome will be analysed in the hierarchical order of 1) time to cardiovascular death; 2) time to first hospitalization due to heart failure; 3) relative change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 180 days. In this last comparison, to have a winner, the relative change needs to differ by more than 20% between two subjects. By the protocol, all the clinical outcomes (including CV death and HF hospitalization) will be assessed until 6 months.
6 months
Subgroup Analysis
Time Frame: Variables at baseline and primary outcome at 6 months
Analysis of the primary endpoint will be performed in pre-specified subgroups: age strata, gender, educational levels, New York Heart Association functional classes, left ventricular ejection fraction strata, NT-proBNP levels, HF aetiology, baseline KCCQ scores, and baseline HF self-care and knowledge scores.
Variables at baseline and primary outcome at 6 months
Analysis according to renal function
Time Frame: Renal function at baseline and study endpoints at 6 months
Analysis of study endpoints (cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization due to heart failure and NT-proBNP variation) will be performed according to baseline renal function strata.
Renal function at baseline and study endpoints at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01 (Miami VAHS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Multifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS)

3
Subscribe