Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up

September 25, 2019 updated by: ALESSANDRO UGOLINI, University of Genova

Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Orthodontic build-ups are made by composite/resin material bonded to the palatal or occlusal surfaces of teeth (usually molars or incisors). Their primary purpose is to prevent heavy contact of the upper teeth with lower fixed appliances in patients with overbite reduction to avoid brackets detachment. These appliances disarticulate the posterior teeth, deprogram the masticatory muscles and allow for eruption, extrusion, and uprighting of the posterior teeth. Build-ups are usually placed in the first months of the fixed orthodontic treatment and contribute to increasing the perception of pain. In the orthodontic daily practice, the pain is the most frequent symptom during treatment and is the one that most frightens/worries the patients. Literature shows that fear of pain is one of the primary reasons that patients fail to seek orthodontic care. Pain has a negative effect on patients' compliance, oral hygiene, and missed appointments. Its effects on patients' daily lives is a major reason for discontinuance of orthodontic treatment.

In the literature the prevention of pain and management of orthodontic builds-ups is a poorly analyzed topic, despite being a daily problem in orthodontic clinical practice. So, the aim of the present study is to investigate and analyze the perception of pain and function impairment with different type of build-ups (anterior or posterior) to identify an efficient clinical management protocol and an effective pain and discomfort prevention strategy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italy, 16129
        • Alessandro Ugolini

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with reduced overbite treated with orthodontic fixed appliance
  • Angle Class I, Class II or Class III malocclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypodontia in any quadrant excluding third molars
  • Craniofacial syndromes, or cleft lip or palate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anterior builds-ups
Intervention orthodontic - fixed orthodontic treatment in patients with overbite reduction: fixed orthodontic treatment with resin build-ups bonded to the palatal surfaces of central upper incisors
After lower brackets placement, resin builds-ups are added on the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors. Both central incisors are customarily bonded to broadly distribute the occlusal forces. Builds-ups are removed when the overbite was considered adequate to prevent lower brackets detachment.
Other Names:
  • Anterior resin bite turbos
Active Comparator: Posterior builds-ups
Intervention orthodontic - fixed orthodontic treatment in patients with overbite reduction: fixed orthodontic treatment with resin build-ups bonded to the occlusal surfaces of first or second upper/lower molars
After lower brackets placement, resin builds-ups are added on the supporting cusps of first or second upper/lower molars. Builds-ups are removed when the overbite was considered adequate to prevent lower brackets detachment.
Other Names:
  • Posterior resin bite turbos

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overbite correction [Millimeters]
Time Frame: 1 week
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters)
1 week
Overbite correction [Millimeters]
Time Frame: 1 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters)
1 months
Overbite correction [Millimeters]
Time Frame: 2 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters)
2 months
Overbite correction [Millimeters]
Time Frame: 3 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters)
3 months
Overbite correction [Time]
Time Frame: 1 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months)
1 months
Overbite correction [Time]
Time Frame: 2 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months)
2 months
Overbite correction [Time]
Time Frame: 3 months
Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months)
3 months
Pain after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 1 week
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain.
1 week
Pain after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 1 months
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain.
1 months
Pain after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 2 months
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain.
2 months
Pain after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain.
3 months
Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 1 week
Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents
1 week
Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 1 months
Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents
1 months
Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 2 months
Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents
2 months
Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement
Time Frame: 3 months
Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RCT Builds-ups

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on orthodontic - Anterior resin builds-ups

Subscribe