Validation of the Adenomyosis Calculator

December 23, 2023 updated by: Marit Lieng, Oslo University Hospital

Prospective Validation of a Prediction Model for Diagnosing Adenomyosis With Ultrasound.

Adenomyosis is a disease where ectopic endometrial glands affect the muscular wall of the uterus. Women that suffer from dysmenorrhea or infertility caused by adenomyosis need to confirm or rule out adenomyosis, and therefore tools for non-histologic confirmation of adenomyosis are indubitably required. Transvaginal ultrasound has been shown to be useful in diagnosing adenomyosis, but the interpretation of findings requires significant expertise in ultrasound and experience with diagnosing adenomyosis. This is because adenomyosis shows a very heterogeneous appearance in ultrasound. There are many different diagnostic signs that have to be considered and weighed.

In a previous study, the investigators have developed a diagnostic algorithm that helps clinicians diagnose adenomyosis with transvaginal ultrasound and a clinical examination. It showed good diagnostic accuracy and seemed to be very robust with regards to artifacts and experience of the examiner. It is now necessary to validate this prediction model in a new, prospective study so it can be used in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Turku, Finland, 20521
        • Turku University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway, 0382
        • Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål and Rikshospital
    • Akershus
      • Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway, 1478
        • Akershus University Hospital, Dept. of gynecology
    • Trøndelag
      • Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway, NO-7006
        • St. Olavs Hospital, Dept. of Gynecology
    • Vestfold
      • Tønsberg, Vestfold, Norway, 3103
        • Sykehuset i Vestfold

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 52 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A consecutive sample of women that are scheduled for a hysterectomy at one of the study sites and fulfill eligibility criteria are invited to participate.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premenopausal (defined by having had menstruation the last six month)
  • If amenorrhea with levonorgestrel intrauterine device, the woman should be < 45 years old
  • Hysterectomy planned due to a benign condition
  • Hysterectomy does not require morcellation it is allowed to divide the uterus into 2-3 pieces, given that the orientation of the specimen is still possible for the pathologist)
  • Written consent is given
  • Can communicate in Norwegian or English at the Norwegian study sites, and Finnish, Swedish or English at the Finnish study site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gynecological cancer present at the time of inclusion
  • Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist within the last 3 months prior to the ultrasound evaluation
  • Prior endometrial ablation or resection
  • Postmenopausal status or no menstrual bleeding for the last 6 months, or amenorrhea with levonorgestrel-intrauterine device and age >45 years.
  • Need for morcellation of the uterus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the prediction model for adenomyosis
Time Frame: 1 year
Diagnostic accuracy will be described using sensitivity (in %), specificity (in %), positive predictive value (in %), negative predictive value (in %), positive likelihood ratio (calculated by sensitivity/1-specificity), negative likelihood ratio (calculated as 1-sensitivity/specificity) and the area under the receiver-operator curve (as calculated with the (0-1) of the model.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between readers
Time Frame: 2 years
ICC values are categorized as follows: 0-0.20, slight agreement; 0.21-0.40, fair agreement; 0.41-0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61-0.80, substantial agreement; and 0.81-1, almost perfect agreement
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marit Lieng, Phd, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share the values of all evaluated predictors in the model so that they can be used for re-calculation.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data is planned to be made available within a year after the publication of all results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be granted upon request and evaluation of the intended use of the data. The intended use should primarily gain improved patient care and research into adenomyosis and a detailed protocol has to be submitted.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenomyosis

3
Subscribe