Project Jumpstart for Improving PrEP Care of Continuum Outcomes

March 29, 2021 updated by: Lisa Eaton, University of Connecticut

Unified Approach to Address PrEP Care Cascade

Stigma related to PrEP interest and uptake, and medication cognitions related to PrEP adherence and persistence remain strong barriers to improving PrEP use. To address these areas, the investigators are proposing to develop an intervention grounded in two novel cognitive/behavioral theories: the HIV Stigma Framework and the Medication Necessity-Concerns Framework. Advances in biomedical HIV prevention, such as the availability of PrEP, will only impact the HIV epidemic if concurrent efforts are made to address the social and behavioral challenges that are associated with achieving sufficient coverage of PrEP among individuals at elevated risk for HIV.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Biomedical HIV prevention tools are very promising, but are not sufficiently reaching those in greatest need. BMSM have experienced elevated rates of HIV incidence and prevalence since the beginning of the US epidemic, and the CDC estimates that half of BMSM will be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetime. Although Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for preventing HIV, there is urgent need to improve efforts to deliver PrEP, in particular, for BMSM at-risk for HIV. Current strategies to increase PrEP interest, uptake, and adherence are not adequate and there are formidable barriers (e.g., stigma surrounding PrEP use, and adherence and retention concerns) to sufficient coverage of PrEP that must be addressed. Without considerable and targeted change to our current approach to PrEP delivery, public health initiatives will fail to adequately provide PrEP to those in greatest need. In our PrEP focused preliminary studies with BMSM, the investigators have identified two primary areas in need of critical focus and intervention - (1) stigma related to PrEP use, and (2) medication cognitions such as the perceived costs and benefits of taking PrEP, both of which can impede PrEP interest, uptake, and adherence. To address these areas the investigators have developed an intervention grounded in two novel cognitive/behavioral theories: the HIV Stigma Framework and the Medication Necessity-Concerns Framework. Our study includes: Conducting a pilot test that compares our (a) PrEP information only control (n=25), (b) PrEP counseling (n=50), (c) PrEP counseling with text messages (n=50), and (d) PrEP enhancement counseling with text messaging and on-demand counseling (n=50). Advances in biomedical HIV prevention, such as the availability of PrEP, will only impact the HIV epidemic if concurrent efforts are made to address the social and behavioral challenges that are associated with achieving sufficient coverage of PrEP among individuals at elevated risk for HIV. Low-resource burden, easily implemented, and effective social/behavioral interventions are urgently needed if the full benefits of PrEP are to be realized. If effective and disseminated, this intervention would meet current prevention needs and its potential impact on HIV infections averted could be substantial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • SHARE Project

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior sex with a man, identify as Black, and HIV negative status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Living with HIV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PrEP information only arm
Information to for accessing HIV prevention tools will be provided to participants.
PrEP focused intervention to improve PrEP related health outcomes
Experimental: PrEP counseling arm
Stigma focused counseling (one-session) aimed at addressing barriers to health care access will be provided.
PrEP focused intervention to improve PrEP related health outcomes
Experimental: PrEP counseling plus text messaging arm
Stigma focused counseling (one-session) and interactive text messaging aimed at addressing barriers to health care access will be provided.
PrEP focused intervention to improve PrEP related health outcomes
Experimental: PrEP counseling plus text messaging and on demand counseling
Ongoing stigma focused counseling and interactive text messaging aimed at addressing barriers to health care access will be provided.
PrEP focused intervention to improve PrEP related health outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP Linkage
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants who attend PrEP care appointment. Documentation will be provided from clinic.
6 months
PrEP Uptake
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants who receive PrEP prescription from provider. Documentation will be provided from clinic.
6 months
PrEP Adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants who adhere to PrEP medications. Documentation will be provided through self report and urine tests (UrSure).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Project Jumpstart

Subscribe