Bilateral vs. Unilateral Stimulation in Neurological Bladder Disroders (UROSTIM)

January 8, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Efficacité Clinique comparée de la Stimulation transcutanée du Nerf Tibial postérieur unilatérale vs bilatérale Pour Traiter Une hyperactivité vésicale Neurologique Non sévère : Essai Clinique randomisé

This study evaluates the effectiveness of bilateral stimulation of the tibial nerve compared to unilateral stimulation in neurological bladder disorders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Urinary disorders are common in neurological diseases. The prognosis of neurological bladders is twofold. On the one hand, symptoms such as incontinence or retention affect quality of life and comfort. On the other hand, complications such as urinary tract infections or renal failure threaten health and even involve patients' vital prognosis. Several therapies are used to treat these urinary disorders including transcutaneous or percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (SNTP). SNTP is used in treating symptoms of bladder overactivity. This treatment is most often used unilaterally, but can be used bilaterally.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral stimulation of the tibial nerve compared to unilateral stimulation in neurological bladder disorders.

50 patients will be included, in two arms by randomization, one arm of 25 patients will be treated by unilateral stimuylation and the other arm of 25 patients will be trated by bilateral stimulation.

They will be evaluate at 3, 6 and 12 months by auto questionnaire and the effectivess of each therapy will be compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Caen Normandie
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who received research information
  • Individuals affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Individuals over 18 years of age
  • Individuals with non-serious neurological bladder hyperactivity

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: bilateral
25 patients with an overactive bladder
Treatment by bilateral neurostimulation of the tibial nerve
Active Comparator: unilateral
25 patients with an overactive bladder
Treatment by unilateral neurostimulation of the tibial nerve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary symptom profile score (USP score)
Time Frame: 3 months
auto quastionnaire between 0 and 39 points The higher the score the higher the urinary symptoms
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mictional calendar
Time Frame: 3 months
records the number of mictions per day and the number of urinary leaks per day over 48 hours
3 months
Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: 3 months
Questionnaire of quality of life improvement :The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurogenic Urinary Bladder, Spastic

Clinical Trials on urostim bilateral

Subscribe