Optimization of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) Injection for the Treatment of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (BOND)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and standardize the way providers perform OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injections into the bladder for the diagnosis of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD)/overactive bladder (OAB). NLUTD/OAB is a syndrome that affects many people, and includes urinary frequency, urinary urgency, urgency incontinence, and nocturia. This syndrome can be challenging to treat and often requires procedural management - including BTX-A injections into the bladder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neurological disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Parkinson's Disease (PD), Spina Bifida (SB), and stroke disrupt neural control of voiding and lead to the development of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), which develops when either the detrusor muscle fails to maintain effective contractions (voiding phase) or fails to relax appropriately with low pressures (storage phase), if the urethral sphincter (internal or external) fails to lower its tonicity and resistance, or if there is an asynchrony in events eventually leading to detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). Different patterns of NLUTD (including both storage and voiding) can arise depending on the level of injury or type of neurological disease. It can be characterized by urinary urgency, frequency and incontinence or urinary hesitancy and retention that leads to urinary tract infections (UTIs). Some patients develop neurogenic overactive bladder (NOAB).

Management of NOAB symptoms is complex. Treatment with BTX-A has been shown to decrease episodes of urinary incontinence and improve quality of life in this population. It has also been shown to ameliorate a multitude of devastating complications, such as upper tract deterioration, recurrent urinary tract infections, sepsis, and death. According to the current manufacturer's recommendation, a standard 200-unit vial of Botox® should be diluted in 30cc of 0.9% saline and injected across 30 different sites in the detrusor muscle (Figure 2). Despite these guidelines, there are wide variations in administration techniques, raising the question what is the best depth and location for injection, and optimal concentration and volume of toxin per injection site. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal injection schema for 200 units or more of intradetrusor BTX-A in patients with NOAB in the office setting.

The investigators hypothesize that patients with NOAB symptoms undergoing intradetrusor injection of 200 units (or more) of BTX-A will be more willing to pursue additional sessions of BTX-A injections with a protocol utilizing less injection sites, while still maintaining effectiveness of the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult men and women (>18 years of age) with a diagnosis of neurological conditions such as MS, PD, CVA, myelomeningocele, SCI, or traumatic brain injury longer than 6 months prior to treatment.
  • Diagnosis of neurogenic bladder indicated for treatment with BTX-A for OAB symptoms.
  • Participants must be able to provide informed consent, as well as understand and be willing to undergo.

follow-up procedures and completion of all questionnaires provided during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic UTI at the time of procedure, defined as positive nitrites or high-volume leukocyte esterase on urine dip in addition to at least one of the following symptoms: dysuria, gross hematuria, suprapubic pain, frequency/urgency above baseline.
  • Diagnosis of bladder pain syndrome or other chronic pain syndrome including fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain, pelvic floor dysfunction, levator myalgia.
  • Untreated bladder malignancy.
  • Women who are currently pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Contraindications to intradetrusor BTX-A injections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Injection Sites
Standard number of injections
200 units or 300 units BTX-A reconstituted in 20 mL normal saline, injected into the bladder detrusor in 20 separate injections of 1 mL including the trigone.
Experimental: Reduced Injection Sites
Reduced number of injections
200 units or 300 units BTX-A reconstituted in 5 mL normal saline, injected into the bladder detrusor in 5 separate injections of 1 mL including the trigone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness to Repeat Procedure
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure and 6 weeks post-procedure
Participants were asked to rate their willingness to repeat the procedure using an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS). A score of 0 ("Never") indicates complete unwillingness, representing the least favorable outcome, while a score of 11 ("Definitely") reflects strong willingness, representing the most favorable outcome.
Immediately post-procedure and 6 weeks post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms After BTX-A Treatment - International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-weeks after BTX-A injections
The ICIQ-SF is a standardized survey that assesses the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QoL). The total score, ranging from 0 to 21, is calculated from three questions, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A score of 0 reflects no leakage and no impact on QoL. Question 1 measures how often leakage occurs (0-5), Question 2 assesses the amount of leakage (0-6), and Question 3 evaluates the impact on QoL (0-10), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. We report the mean difference in total ICIQ and QoL scores from baseline to 6-weeks post-treatment.
Baseline and 6-weeks after BTX-A injections
Change in Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms After BTX-A Treatment - Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score - Short Form (NBSS-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-weeks after BTX-A injections

The NBSS-SF is a validated survey with 10 questions that measure bladder symptoms across 3 different domains: incontinence (score range: 0-12), storage and voiding (score range: 0-9), and consequences (score range: 0-7); the highest score is associated with worse symptoms. It also includes one question to assess overall quality of life (QoL) scored from 0 (pleased) to 4 (unhappy). The total score, ranging from 0 to 28, is calculated from the three domains (Q3-Q10), with 0 being the best outcome and 28 the worst outcome. Here we report the mean difference in total NBSS-SF, each of the domains and QoL scores from baseline to 6-weeks post-treatment.

The NBSS-SF is a validated 10-question survey that assesses bladder symptoms across three domains: incontinence (score range: 0-12), storage and voiding (score range: 0-9), and consequences (score range: 0-7), with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. It also includes a quality of life (QoL) question (Q2) scored from 0 (pleased)

Baseline and 6-weeks after BTX-A injections
Patient Impression of Clinical Improvement After BTX-A - Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks after BTX-A injection
The PGI-I is a validated tool for assessing patient satisfaction after therapy. It consists of a single question using a Likert scale to measure perceived improvement or worsening after BTX-A treatment, ranging from 1 ("Very much worse") to 7 ("Very much better"). Data reported here reflect average scores obtained at the six-week follow-up.
6 weeks after BTX-A injection
Patient Reported Procedural Discomfort - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Prior to and immediately after BTX-A injections
Participants rated their pain using the NPRS to assess discomfort during the BTX-A procedure. The NPRS is an 11-point scale (0-10), where 0 represents no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain ever experienced. Higher scores reflect greater pain intensity. We report the change in NPRS scores from before to immediately after the procedure.
Prior to and immediately after BTX-A injections

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rose Khavari, MD, Houston Methodist Research Group

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe