Agreement and Accuracy of Different Devices for Biometry Measurements in Patients With Cataract (Comparison)

March 24, 2020 updated by: Rupert Menapace, Medical University of Vienna

The rationale of this study is to compare repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of three different AS-OCT devices and Pentacam.

The investigational devices are approved biometry and keratometry devices to perform biometric/keratometric measurements preoperatively before cataract surgery. The measurements are used to calculate the needed IOL power.

Measurements with all four devices will be performed 3 times consecutively by two trained observer. The order of the observer, the order of devices as well as the eye (left/right) is randomized.

Examinations will be implemented in accordance with the approved investigational plan on subjects and includes: repeated biometry/keratometry with four different devices

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The rationale of this study is to compare repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of both, AS-OCT(s) and Pentacam. In our department three different AS-OCT devices and a HR Scheimpflug imaging device are currently in use for clinical routine to measure the cornea. Among refractive and anterior segment surgeons, there is no preferred and accepted method for accurate measurements of the corneal curvature. The four diagnostic tools are based on different technical and physical imaging principles and to date only limited information on their comparability exist. One advantage of ASOCT represents faster imaging speed when compared to Scheimpflug imaging. Thus, imaging misalignment, segmentation errors and defocus aberration can most likely be avoided by AS-OCT. Chen et al demonstrated that HR Scheimpflug imaging measurements of CCT were systematically higher than the measurements provided by FD AS-OCT. Further, repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging device will be assessed during follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age-related cataract
  • Age 40 and older (females of childbearing age will be interviewed if pregnancy is possible)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contact lens wear within 5 days
  • Pathologic changes of the cornea, eye lid or conjunctiva on slit- lamp examination
  • History of corneal ocular surgery
  • Microphthalmus
  • Recurrent intraocular inflammation of unknown etiology
  • Blind fellow eye
  • Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: IOL Master® 700
Biometry will be performed three times consecutively.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.
Active Comparator: Pentacam®
Keratometry will be performed three times consecutively.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.
Active Comparator: Casia II®
Keratometry will be performed three times consecutively.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.
Active Comparator: Spectralis Anterion®
Biometry will be performed three times consecutively.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.
Patients will be asked to place the chin in position and open their eyes wide. In between measurements, the patient will be arranged so his eyes are in one horizontal line and each time before measurement the patient will be asked to blink several times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement of the four devices measuring mean keratometry value.
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured K-Value of each device and the k-values within one device will be compared
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement of the four devices measuring mean steep keratometry value.
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured steep K-Value of each device and the steep k-values within one device will be compared
1 year
Agreement of the four devices measuring mean flat keratometry value.
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured flat K-Value of each device and the flat k-values within one device will be compared
1 year
Agreement of the four devices measuring mean true keratometry value.
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured true K-Value of each device and the true k-values within one device will be compared
1 year
Agreement of the devices measuring mean axial length
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured axial length of each device and the axial length within one device will be compared
1 year
Agreement of the devices measuring mean lens thickness
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured lens thickness of each device and the measured lens thickness within one device will be compared
1 year
Agreement of the devices measuring mean white-to-white measurement
Time Frame: 1 year
The measured white-to-white distance of each device and the measured white-to-white distance within one device will be compared
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rupert Menapace, MD, Medical University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1845/2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Biometry

3
Subscribe