High-flow Nasal Cannula and Exercise Tolerance in COPD

April 16, 2020 updated by: Marcelo Alcantara Holanda

Acute Effects of High-flow Nasal Cannula and Non-invasive Ventilation on Constant-load Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Patients with COPD are often unable to sustain a sufficient workload during exercise. The use of external strategies to improve exercise tolerance, such as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) have been used. The objective was to evaluate and compare the acute effects of HFNT and NIV during exercise on cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea, exercise tolerance and comfort in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patients underwent an initial clinical examination, with anthropometric evaluation, blood gas analysis, pulmonary function tests and measurement of maximum respiratory pressures. The exercise protocol started in the sector of Ergometry and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. After completing the maximum incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test, two additional visits were scheduled for the three constant load tests. All patients studied underwent an evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). During maximum-incremental CPET, breath by breath: oxygen consumption (V̇O2, mL/min), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2, mL/min), respiratory exchange rate (RER), minute ventilation VE (L/min), respiratory rate (bpm), equivalent ventilation for O2 and CO2 (V̇E/V̇O2 and V̇E/V̇CO2). In addition, cardiac monitoring was performed by 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) throughout the procedure. On the day of the experiment, the patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the previously determined peak, separated by an interval of at least 1 hour.

The NIV parameters were adjusted for each patient with Trilogy 100 (Philips™). Spontaneous ventilation mode was set before the protocol for all patients, and a previous period of NIV adaptation was performed to titrate the inspiratory and expiratory pressures. The adaptation period started with the minimum Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP) value of 15cmH2O, and, every 2 minutes, increasing the pressure every 2 cmH2O according to the patient's tolerance.16 The Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) was programmed to vary between 4 and 6 cmH2O. Before the start of the examination, an adaptation was performed with the selected mask and initial ventilator settings for 20 min. No additional oxygen was offered.

The high flow system used was Optiflow® (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand). Before the test, flow titration was performed for the patient, which started with the administration of a minimum gas flow of 30L/min and, every 2 minutes, the flow was increased by 5L/min according to patient tolerance. The test only started after 20 minutes of adaptation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CE
      • Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 60.430-370
        • Federal University of Ceará

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous COPD
  • FEV1 ≤ 50%
  • Optimized medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • COPD Exacerbation
  • Cardiac disease
  • Previous neurologic disorders
  • Unable to complete all protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
The cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed with patient breathing room air.
All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The control test was performed with no additional therapy.
Active Comparator: NIV
The cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed with non-invasive ventilation during the test.
All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The NIV was used during all exercise test.
Active Comparator: HFNT
The cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed with a High flow nasal therapy during the test.
All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The high flow nasal therapy was used during all exercise test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise dinamic hyperinflation
Time Frame: one week after all tests
To determine the dinamic hyperinflation during exercise test with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. During all testes the dinamic hyperinflation will be measured by inspiratory capacity (at rest and at the end o exercise test) and will be demonstrated as porcentage os maximum.
one week after all tests
Exercise Tolerance
Time Frame: one week after all tests
To determine the exercise tolerance with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. Time of exercise test will be measured to determine which test could be the best for COPD patients. In additional, the workload will (treadmill inclination and speed) be check to show which intervention has the better response.
one week after all tests

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea
Time Frame: one week after all tests
To determine the dyspnea during exercise test with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. After all situations, Borg scale will be performed to check the dyspnea score at the end of exercise.
one week after all tests

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3.009.159

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This is study will be submitted to a medical journal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Clinical Trials on Control

Subscribe