Diagnostics of COVID-19/DARTS (Development and Assessment of Rapid Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak)

April 14, 2020 updated by: St George's, University of London

Development and Assessment of Rapid Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak (DARTS)

This project will evaluate point-of-care / point-of-need (POC/PON) tests for the detection of the novel strain of coronavirus (2019 nCoV). We are working with Mologic Ltd, who have been funded by DFID/Wellcome Trust to develop a rapid, accurate and low cost, lateral flow assay (LFA) to detect viral circulating antigens and IgM/G against SARS-CoV-2 in less than 15 minutes.

These POC/PON tests are intended for the rapid triage of patients with fever and/or cough and to identify patients likely to be immune from previous infections. In addition to this the POC/PON tests will be designed as self-tests, offering the additional benefit of enabling wide deployment in the home and community settings. In addition, we will evaluate ELISA assays, also produced by Mologic to detect IgG and IgM (and possibly IgA) against SARS-CoV-2. Comparison of antibody and antigen dynamics over time will compare with ELISA and quantitative RT-PCR.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

On 12 January 2020, a novel coronavirus was identified as the cause of an outbreak of unexplained pneumonia in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China. This coronavirus was later named SARS-CoV-2, and the disease it causes COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 is a non-segmented, positive sense RNA virus and part of the family of coronaviruses. Similar to the Systemic Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus, it binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor located on type II alveolar cells and intestinal epithelia. SARS-CoV-2 can result in a severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) which is characterised by diffuse alveolar damage and direct viral cytopathic effect on pneumocytes. Some patients who develop COVID19 may respond with a fulminant "cytokine storm" reaction.

As of 23 March 2020, a total of 374,921 COVID-19 cases have been reported in 168 countries with a total of over 16,411 deaths (case fatality amongst confirmed cases of 4.4%) (John Hopkins's Coronavirus Resource centre). Over 293,425 cases and 13,258 deaths have been reported from countries outside mainland China. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared on the 12th of March the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak a pandemic in the context of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) [4]. Europe has rapidly become the epicentre of the pandemic and in the UK, cases are increasing daily. There have been 6,724 confirmed cases in the UK as of 23 March 2020, including 190 confirmed inpatients at St George's Hospital NHS Trust (23 March 2020 , Dr. Breathnach, personal communication).

Because of the lack of a validated serological test, the actual number, and therefore the proportion, of people that develop asymptomatic infection remains unknown. This means that an accurate case fatality estimate remains elusive. Due to the rise in the number of diagnostic samples, tests are taking longer than expected. Among the foremost priorities to facilitate public health interventions is a reliable laboratory diagnosis. Prompt case ascertainment is necessary to ensure rapid and effective contact tracing, implementation of infection prevention and control measures according to WHO recommendations, and collection of relevant epidemiological and clinical information.

Because of the lack of a validated serological test, the actual number, and therefore the proportion, of people that develop asymptomatic infections remains unknown. This means that an accurate case fatality estimate remains elusive. Due to the rise of the number of samples to diagnose, tests are taking longer than expected. Among the foremost priorities to facilitate public health interventions is a reliable laboratory diagnosis. Prompt case confirmation is necessary to ensure rapid and effective contact tracing, implementation of infection prevention and control measures according to WHO recommendations, and collection of relevant epidemiological and clinical information.

The experience in China has been that around 15% of patients with confirmed infection develop severe disease and around 5% become critically ill. In the UK, a modelling analysis by the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team suggests that even with the implementation of self-isolation measures (household quarantine and social distancing) the surge limits for both general wards and ICU beds will be exceeded 8-fold. Furthermore, a relaxation of these mitigation measures is likely to lead to a rebound of cases until there is an effective vaccine - which is not expected for some 12-18 months. We can therefore clearly expect a significant number of inpatients with COVID-19 infection in the UK in the coming months.

The SARS-CoV-2 antigen and antibody lateral flow assay (LFA) development has been led by Mologic, a company based in Bedford. We will use prototype LFA and ELISA that are ready for preliminary evaluation, and subsequently use these tests on-site to evaluate the test at POC. LFA have been developed for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in throat/ nose swabs and detection of IgG and IgM in blood/serum and SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection, IgG, IgM and IgA in saliva. Saliva is an exciting sample to use as it is far easier to use than blood or throat / nose swabs for potential self-testing.

Additionally, it is currently unknown why some patients develop severe COVID-19, while others affected by the same SARS-CoV-2 infection display only mild symptoms. Co-morbidities such as hypertension, kidney disease and diabetes have been linked to poorer prognosis and clinical outcomes. However, a proportion of patients of younger age and without comorbidities also develop severe disease- and there is a need for greater understanding of the immunopathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection is important.

The use of diagnostics developed within this study will improve the management of cases of COVID-19. The LFA are rapid, easy to use and designed to be affordable globally. The rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 with antigen detection will allow patients to be rapidly triaged in hospital, GP surgeries and other places such as immigration areas. They are sufficiently cheap to be appropriate for use in low- and middle-income countries. The use of antibody detection will allow both for diagnosis of immunological response to acute infections as well as after patients have recovered later . To utilise these tests appropriately an understanding of dynamic immunopathological changes over time is necessary.

Characterisation of immune response and susceptibility and its association with viral clearance and disease progression on in large cohorts with varied disease severity is important to assist clinical risk prediction outcomes and evaluate the potential for novel immunotherapeutic interventions. Immune response characteristics may have predictive and prognostic value, with early adaptive immune responses possibly correlated with improved clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0RE
        • St. Georges Hospital Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients population will include inpatients ad St George Hospital Foundation Trust (SGHFT) requiring SARS-CoV-2 test.

Health Care Professionals population will encompass staff working at St George Hospital Foundation Trust (SGHFT) during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak who are suspected or confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2.

Description

==INCLUSION CRITERIA =========

Negative SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged 18 years of age or over
  • Negative SARS-CoV-2 result from specimen received at SWLP laboratory in SGHFT

Positive SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged 18 years of age or over
  • Positive SARS-CoV-2 result from specimen received at SWLP laboratory in SGHFT
  • Requires hospitalisation in SGHFT

HCP with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged 18 years of age
  • Staff member with positive SARS-CoV-2 result from specimen received at SWLP laboratory in SGHFT or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19

==EXCLUSION CRITERIA =========

Negative SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged less than 18 years
  • Outpatients
  • History of known immune suppression

Positive SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged less than 18 years
  • Patients unlikely to survive >28 days in view of attending medical team
  • Outpatients
  • Anticipated transfer to another hospital within 72 hours
  • History of known immune suppression

HCP with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2:

  • Aged less than 18 years
  • History of known immune suppression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
SARS-CoV-2 negative inpatients
Hospitalised adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative tests.
SARS-CoV-2 positive inpatients
Hospitalised adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 positive tests.
SARS-CoV-2 suspected or confirmed NHS staff
Suspected or proven SARS-CoV-2 positive cases amongst health care professionals and lab staff.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 3 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 3 post baseline samples.
Day 3 post baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 5 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 5 post baseline samples.
Day 5 post baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 7 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 7 post baseline samples.
Day 7 post baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 10 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 10 post baseline samples.
Day 10 post baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Days 14 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 14 post baseline samples.
Days 14 post baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 28 baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 28 post baseline samples.
Day 28 baseline samples
Antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 56 post baseline samples
Antibody titres at day 56 post baseline samples.
Day 56 post baseline samples

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antigen dynamics
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 7,10 14 and 28 and 56 post baseline samples
Viral (SARS-CoV-2) antigen dynamics over time
Days 3, 5, 7,10 14 and 28 and 56 post baseline samples
HLA-KIR interactions
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 7,10 14 and 28 and 56 post baseline samples
Examine HLA-KIR interactions in relation to CD8 anti-viral responses
Days 3, 5, 7,10 14 and 28 and 56 post baseline samples
Plasma cytokine levels
Time Frame: Day 7, day 14 and optionally day 28.
Plasma levels of cytokines (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta) measured by Luminex multiplex and/or ELISA assays and expressed in ug/ml
Day 7, day 14 and optionally day 28.
Transcriptome
Time Frame: Day 7, day 14 and optionally day 28.
Total RNA will be isolated then used for cDNA synthesis and amplification. Samples will undergo 100-bp DNA sequencing, sequenced reads will be aligned to a reference genome and differentially expressed genes analysed using open source software. Pathway enrichment analysis will then be performed and the Mixture of Isoforms probabilistic framework applied to assess alternative transcription events. Differential gene expression analysis will identify key genes upregulated in COVID-19 versus control subjects, and at different timepoints in the COVID-19 disease process.
Day 7, day 14 and optionally day 28.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 15, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Subscribe