Effect of Kinesiotaping in Different Directions on Muscle

May 8, 2020 updated by: Hilal UZUNLAR, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

Effect of Kinesiotaping in Different Directions on Muscle Endurance in Healthy Individuals

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of different Kinesio taping directions on dynamic muscle endurance. This randomized, double-blind, crossover study was implemented on 27 healthy male subjects. Before the study, personal and demographic information of the volunteers were recorded and muscle strength was evaluated in the biceps curl position with 1 maximum repetition technique. One week after this first evaluation muscle endurance was evaluated by counting the accurate elbow flexions completed in biceps curl position with 80% weight of 1 maximum repetition recorded in the first evaluation. Following this second evaluation facilitation, inhibition, and placebo tapings were applied to all the 27 subjects who were randomly assigned into 3 groups sequentially with an interval of two days. The sequence of taping technique to be used for the groups were also randomly determined and applied to the M. Biceps Brachii and muscle endurance was evaluated with the same method half-hour after the tape was applied. All the evaluations were performed by the same evaluator who was blind to the taping technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Facilitation taping was applied from the origins of the muscle to the insertion. Inhibition taping was applied from the insertio of the muscle to the origin. Facilitation taping and inhibition taping was applied on the target tissue with 25% tension. Y-band was used during facilitation taping and inhibition taping. It was applied to individuals with shoulder mild abduction, external rotation, elbow extension and supination position. Placebo taping was applied while in a resting position. In placebo taping, it was applied using two I bands in horizontal direction. In placebo taping, no tension was applied to the tapes. Evaluations were made while the subjects were standing. The biceps curl exercise position starts with the palms facing the trunk. Elbow flexion is completed by making full range of motion. The cases were randomized into 3 groups: group-1 facilitation taping, group-2 inhibition taping and group-3 placebo taping.The treatment sequence to be applied to the patients was determined by randomization. Facilitation, inhibition and placebo banding were applied to the patients, respectively. Accordingly, inhibition and placebo taping was applied to the cases that started with the facilitation taping. Placebo and facilitation banding were applied to the patients that started with inhibition banding, respectively. Facilitation and inhibition banding was applied to the cases that started with placebo banding, respectively. During the evaluation, banding application was kept by wearing plenty of clothes. Evaluators and subjects participating in the study did not have knowledge and experience about the taping method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mugla, Turkey, 48000
        • Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Health Sciences Faculty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 23 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a male university student over the age of 18
  • Volunteering for the study
  • Fiiling out the informed consent form not having the knowledge and experience about kinesiotaping before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anabolic agent users
  • Having any neurological disease or systemic disease
  • Having undergone spine and upper extremity surgery
  • Skin sensitivity to elastic banding
  • Open wound, ulser, fungal infection in the area to be taped
  • Exposure to upper extremity and/or spinal injury in the past 6 months
  • To have used alcohol, caffeine-containing substances and pain medication in the last 24 hours before the evaluation.
  • To have been involved in physical activity and / or activities in the last 48 hours prior to the evaluation, other than routine work, that will tire the upper limbs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Grup 1- Facilitation
It consists of cases that start with the taping of the facilitation.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps brachii muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the origin to insertion of the muscle.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps braki muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the insertio to origo of the muscle.
Unlike Kinesio taping muscle technique, it was performed with horizontal taping on the muscle. The ends of the kinesio tapes will be applied tension-free without overlapping with I tape.
Experimental: Grup 2- İnhibition
It consists of cases that start with the taping of the inhibition.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps brachii muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the origin to insertion of the muscle.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps braki muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the insertio to origo of the muscle.
Unlike Kinesio taping muscle technique, it was performed with horizontal taping on the muscle. The ends of the kinesio tapes will be applied tension-free without overlapping with I tape.
Placebo Comparator: Grup 3- Plasebo
It consists of cases that start with the taping of the placebo.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps brachii muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the origin to insertion of the muscle.
The muscle technique, which is a kinesio tape technique, will be used in the biceps braki muscle. Taping was done with 25% tension with Y tape from the insertio to origo of the muscle.
Unlike Kinesio taping muscle technique, it was performed with horizontal taping on the muscle. The ends of the kinesio tapes will be applied tension-free without overlapping with I tape.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Elbow Flexion
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Muscle endurance was found by recording the number of elbow flexions performed within 1 minute in the biceps curl exercise position against moderate violence at the rate of 80% of 1 maximum repetition. Facilitation taping, inhibition taping and placebo taping were applied to 27 subjects randomized to 3 groups at two consecutive day intervals. The order of taping was also determined by randomization method and performed on the biceps braki muscle in the dominant limb of the subjects, and muscle endurance was evaluated half an hour after taping.
2 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum of 1 Repetition (1-MT)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Muscle strength was found with a maximum of 1 repetition (1-MT) in the biceps curl exercise position. The subjects were asked to perform the movement against resistance with the greatest weight predicted during this evaluation position. When he was able to repeat the movement a second time or more, we continued by adding 5 kg, 3 kg, 2 kg or 1 kg weights, respectively. 1-MT was found by giving 1 minute rest intervals between repeated trials.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 190079

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on KINESIOTAPING

Clinical Trials on FACILITATION TAPING

Subscribe