Prospective Study on the Role of Eus-fnb in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis (BIO_AIP)

February 6, 2025 updated by: Stefano Francesco Crinò, MD, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

According to the reported histological procurement yield of the end-cutting needles, the investigators supposed that the use of EUS-FNB in probable AIP patients, generally aimed only to rule-out malignancy, could provide histological tissue samples useful in enhancing the diagnostic level reached without histology, or defining the type of AIP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The primary aim is to evaluate the capability of EUS-FNB to enhance diagnostic levels of AIP, that means to obtain definitive diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 AIP. Secondary aims are to evaluate: Safety of EUS-FNB in this setting of patients; the possibility to obtain a definitive diagnosis in focal/segmental form of AIP (that are the most clinically relevant because of the mimicking of cancer); diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB in this patient population; the rate of pancreatic neoplasms mimicking AIP.

Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old, with suspected focal or diffuse AIP, according to ICDC (probable type 1 AIP; probable type 2 AIP; NOS-AIP) with written consent to participate in the study will be enrolled.

Exclusion criteria include: previous diagnosis of AIP; definitive type 1 AIP; steroid administration within 3 months before the EUS-FNB; coagulation disorders; pregnancy and lactation; unability to give informed consent .

The histopathology of the preparations will be evaluated, according to the ICDC, including the LPSP findings and the IDCP findings and recording the absence or presence of specific criteria: Periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate without GELs, Storiform fibrosis, Obliterative phlebitis >10 IgG4-positive cells per HPF; GEL of duct wall; Granulocytic and lympho- plasmacytic acinar infiltrate.

According to the current clinical practice, when the diagnosis of AIP is confirmed (and malignancy is ruled-out) patient will be treated with the standard therapy for AIP. Patients will be followed for 12 months, in order to exclude misdiagnosed malignancy, and to evaluate the clinical course of the disease (response to steroid therapy, relapses, changes in imaging findings or surgical pathology in resected patients).

The final diagnosis of AIP will be confirmed on surgical pathology (in resected patients) or when a compatible clinical course is observed during a follow-up of at least 1 year (significant improvement on imaging after steroid therapy, no appearance of metastasis or sign of infiltration).

The number of cases where EUS-FNB histology improves the diagnostic level will be summarized using absolute and relative frequencies. The 95% confidence interval of this proportion will also be computed. The number of adverse events, the number of cases where histological finding diagnostic of AIP are observed in focal/segmental form and the number of pancreatic neoplasm will be summarized using absolute and relative frequencies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood Ratio (LR-) and the ROC curve will be used to analyze the capability of EUS-FNB to obtain a definitive diagnosis of type 1 and 2 AIP.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Verona, Italy, 37134
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata Verona
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Tsukasa Ikeura

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with suspected AIP who need histological sampling for diagnosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old;
  • Suspected focal or diffuse AIP, according to ICDC:

Probable type 1 AIP Probable type 2 AIP NOS-AIP

• provision of written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of AIP
  • Definitive type 1 AIP
  • Steroid administration within 3 months before the EUS-FNB
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary aim is to evaluate the capability of EUS-FNB to enhance diagnostic levels of AIP, that means to obtain definitive diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 AIP.
Time Frame: 2 years

For the primary aim, the endpoint is the percentage of cases where EUS-FNB histology improve the diagnostic level:

  • from a probable AIP 1 to definitive AIP 1 (i.e., percentage of type 1 Level 1 H);
  • from a probable AIP 2 to definitive AIP 2 (i.e., percentage of type 2 Level 1 H);
  • from an AIP-NOS to AIP 1 or 2 (i.e., percentage of type 1 and 2, Level 1 H or Level 2 H).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of EUS-FNB in AIP patients: percentage of adverse events observed
Time Frame: 2 years
The percentage of adverse events observed
2 years
The possibility to obtain a definitive diagnosis in focal/segmental form of AIP (that are the most clinically relevant because of the mimicking of cancer).
Time Frame: 2 years
The Percentage of cases where histological finding diagnostic of AIP (Level 1 and Level 2) are observed in focal/segmental form.
2 years
Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB in this patient population.
Time Frame: 2 years
The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy calculated in comparison with the final diagnosis
2 years
The rate of pancreatic neoplasms mimicking AIP
Time Frame: 2 years
The percentage of pancreatic neoplasm in the study population
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefano Francesco Crinò, Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata Verona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Subscribe