Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia

January 19, 2023 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve With Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia

Lateral epicondylalgia is a common musculoskeletal condition that approximately affects 1-3% of the general population. Several authors have found greater mechanical pain sensitivity in the radial nerve when compared with healthy subjects. Radial tunnel syndrome exhibits a similar clinical presentation to lateral epicondylalgia. Percutaneous electrical stimulation has shown reduce pain in several conditions. Percutaneous electrical stimulation on the radial nerve could cause an important relief in lateral epicondylalgia.

Hypothesis: Percutaneous electrical stimulation on radial nerve plus exercise therapy in patients with lateral epicondylalgia is better than sham percutaneous electrical stimulation plus exercise.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS). PENS is technique to provide a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current throughout needling filaments place close to the nerve.

Study Aims:

Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, mid and long-term of PENS on intensity of pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale and disability as measured by Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.

Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PENS on disability as measured by DASH questionnaire, and psychological factors (fear and avoidance and catastrophism) and Global Rating of Change (GRoC) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Gustavo Plaza, PT, PhD
  • Phone Number: +34 609578380
  • Email: gusplaza@ucm.es

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
        • Contact:
          • Gustavo Plaza, PT, PhD
          • Phone Number: +34 609578380
          • Email: gusplaza@ucm.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lateral epicondylalgia symptoms confirmed with at least 2 of the 4 following test:

    1. pain during palpation of lateral epicondyle
    2. pain on resisted wrist extension
    3. pain on resisted middle finger extension
    4. pain during hand-grip.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of fractures, luxations, surgery and/or musculoskeletal disorders in upper limb.

    • Neurological disorders, inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases.
    • Having received as treatment techniques that involve needles on the previous 6 months to study enrollment, or having received percutaneous electrical stimulation as a treatment before.
    • Cervical pathology, fibromyalgia, unstable cardiovascular diseases, pregnant women or under suspect of pregnancy.
    • Contraindications of needle's insertions: anticoagulant therapy, needle phobia, diabetes, hypothyroidism, lymphoedema, muscular diseases).
    • Contraindications of electrical current application.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PENS plus exercise group
Experimental: PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently . It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.

The technique will be performed ultrasound-guided on the radial nerve, the places of the needle's insertions will be the following:

  • Needle will be placed at under the lateral intermuscular septum between the triceps brachii and brachialis, approximately 10cm superior to the lateral epicondyle
  • Needle will be placed at the upper third of the forearm on the posterior interosseous nerve after passing the arcade of Froshe

The percutaneous electrical stimulation will be realized with a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) current:

  • TENS Frequency 2 Hz
  • TENS Pulse width - 250 microseconds
  • Duration - 30 minutes.
  • TENS Intensity - Increased at an intensity of visible motor response of the innervated musculature and maximal tolerable intensity.
  • Administration - One per week

Self-management loaded exercises prescribed by a physical therapist, two times per week.

Sham Comparator: Sham PENS plus exercise group
Sham Comparator: Sham PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently. It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.

The technique will be performed ultrasound-guided on the radial nerve, the places of the needle's insertions will be the following:

  • Needle will be placed at under the lateral intermuscular septum between the triceps brachii and brachialis, approximately 10cm superior to the lateral epicondyle
  • Needle will be placed at the upper third of the forearm on the posterior interosseous nerve after passing the arcade of Froshe

The electrical current will not be working, and the needles will be placed during 30 minutes:

- Administration - One per week

Self-management loaded exercises prescribed by a physical therapist, two times per week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Elbow Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Pain intensity measured with a 10 (0 - No pain - 10 The worst pain) numeric rating scale
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Elbow Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Measured with Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). It is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability in patients
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Changes in Upper Extremity Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up period
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Measured with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. It includes 30 items assessing (1) degree of difficulty during the preceding week in performing several physical activities because of problems in a upper extremity (21 items), (2) severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity related pain, tingling, weakness, and stiffness (5 items), and (3) the problem's effect on social activities, work, and sleep and its psychological impact (4 items). Each item is answered on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (no difficulty to perform, no symptom, or no impact) to 5 (unable to do, very severe symptom, or high impact). The responses to the 30 items are summed to form a raw score that is then converted to a scale from 0 to 100 with a formula. A higher score reflects greater disability.
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Changes in Kinesiophobia between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear. The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44. The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Changes in Pain Catastrophizing between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score. Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Changes in Self-perceived Improvement between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
Global ratings on changes in regards to their level of elbow well-being since the treatment on a 15-point self-report scale (from -7, very much worse, to 7, completely recover)
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tennis Elbow

Clinical Trials on PENS plus exercise

3
Subscribe