- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04442321
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia
Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve With Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia
Lateral epicondylalgia is a common musculoskeletal condition that approximately affects 1-3% of the general population. Several authors have found greater mechanical pain sensitivity in the radial nerve when compared with healthy subjects. Radial tunnel syndrome exhibits a similar clinical presentation to lateral epicondylalgia. Percutaneous electrical stimulation has shown reduce pain in several conditions. Percutaneous electrical stimulation on the radial nerve could cause an important relief in lateral epicondylalgia.
Hypothesis: Percutaneous electrical stimulation on radial nerve plus exercise therapy in patients with lateral epicondylalgia is better than sham percutaneous electrical stimulation plus exercise.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS). PENS is technique to provide a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current throughout needling filaments place close to the nerve.
Study Aims:
Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, mid and long-term of PENS on intensity of pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale and disability as measured by Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.
Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PENS on disability as measured by DASH questionnaire, and psychological factors (fear and avoidance and catastrophism) and Global Rating of Change (GRoC) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Gustavo Plaza, PT, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 609578380
- Email: gusplaza@ucm.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Recruiting
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
-
Contact:
- Gustavo Plaza, PT, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 609578380
- Email: gusplaza@ucm.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Lateral epicondylalgia symptoms confirmed with at least 2 of the 4 following test:
- pain during palpation of lateral epicondyle
- pain on resisted wrist extension
- pain on resisted middle finger extension
- pain during hand-grip.
Exclusion Criteria:
History of fractures, luxations, surgery and/or musculoskeletal disorders in upper limb.
- Neurological disorders, inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases.
- Having received as treatment techniques that involve needles on the previous 6 months to study enrollment, or having received percutaneous electrical stimulation as a treatment before.
- Cervical pathology, fibromyalgia, unstable cardiovascular diseases, pregnant women or under suspect of pregnancy.
- Contraindications of needle's insertions: anticoagulant therapy, needle phobia, diabetes, hypothyroidism, lymphoedema, muscular diseases).
- Contraindications of electrical current application.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: PENS plus exercise group
Experimental: PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation.
In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently .
It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.
|
The technique will be performed ultrasound-guided on the radial nerve, the places of the needle's insertions will be the following:
The percutaneous electrical stimulation will be realized with a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) current:
Self-management loaded exercises prescribed by a physical therapist, two times per week. |
Sham Comparator: Sham PENS plus exercise group
Sham Comparator: Sham PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation.
In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently.
It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.
|
The technique will be performed ultrasound-guided on the radial nerve, the places of the needle's insertions will be the following:
The electrical current will not be working, and the needles will be placed during 30 minutes: - Administration - One per week Self-management loaded exercises prescribed by a physical therapist, two times per week. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in Elbow Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Pain intensity measured with a 10 (0 - No pain - 10 The worst pain) numeric rating scale
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in Elbow Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Measured with Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE).
It is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability in patients
|
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Changes in Upper Extremity Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up period
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Measured with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire.
It includes 30 items assessing (1) degree of difficulty during the preceding week in performing several physical activities because of problems in a upper extremity (21 items), (2) severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity related pain, tingling, weakness, and stiffness (5 items), and (3) the problem's effect on social activities, work, and sleep and its psychological impact (4 items).
Each item is answered on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (no difficulty to perform, no symptom, or no impact) to 5 (unable to do, very severe symptom, or high impact).
The responses to the 30 items are summed to form a raw score that is then converted to a scale from 0 to 100 with a formula.
A higher score reflects greater disability.
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Changes in Kinesiophobia between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.
To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear.
The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44.
The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia
|
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Changes in Pain Catastrophizing between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score.
Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Changes in Self-perceived Improvement between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Global ratings on changes in regards to their level of elbow well-being since the treatment on a 15-point self-report scale (from -7, very much worse, to 7, completely recover)
|
Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19/043
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tennis Elbow
-
Miriam MarksRecruitingElbow Tendinitis | Elbow, TennisSwitzerland
-
Indiana Hand to Shoulder CenterCTM BiomedicalEnrolling by invitationTennis Elbow | Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy | Lateral Epicondylitis \(Tennis Elbow\)United States
-
HydroCision, Inc.CompletedElbow, TennisUnited States
-
Kasiak Research Pvt. Ltd.UnknownLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)India
-
Travanti Pharma Inc.Cetero Research, San AntonioUnknownLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)United States
-
Kaunas University of MedicineUniversity Hospital, LinkoepingUnknown
-
Haseki Training and Research HospitalCompletedLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)Turkey
-
McMaster UniversityArthrex, Inc.; The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation; Radiological...TerminatedLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)Canada, United States
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterWithdrawnLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)United States
-
Travanti Pharma Inc.ResearchPointCompletedLateral Epicondylitis | (Tennis Elbow)United States
Clinical Trials on PENS plus exercise
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridWithdrawnLateral EpicondylitisSpain
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Aging (NIA); National Center for Complementary and Integrative...Completed
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosRecruiting
-
OrigenKinesis fisioterapiaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridCompleted
-
Hospital General Universitario ElcheCompleted
-
University of VirginiaAccelerated Care Plus; Mid-Atlantic Athletic Trainers' AssociationCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Universidad Autonoma de MadridUnknown
-
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training...Completed
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed