A Study on the Use of Tourniquet Use In Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

August 4, 2020 updated by: Dr. Yan Chun-Hoi, The University of Hong Kong

A Prospective Randomized Trial on the Use of Tourniquet in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation. On the other hand, the associated risks include skin burns, soft tissue and muscle damage, injury of calcified vessels, increased swelling and stiffness of the joints, nerve injury, paralysis, and thromboembolic events. The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system (Zimmer) was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed to investigate the best tourniquet strategy in TKA. The participants were randomly allocated to groups with different tourniquet strategies: Group 1) tourniquet inflation from skin to cement hardening (skin to cement); Group 2) tourniquet inflation only from cementation (cement only) and Group 3) tourniquet inflation from skin incision to skin closure (skin to skin). In addition to the blood loss and early postoperative outcomes, pain, soft tissue injury, and rehabilitation were also strictly monitored with a longer follow-up duration up to 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation. On the other hand, the associated risks include skin burns, soft tissue and muscle damage, injury of calcified vessels, increased swelling and stiffness of the joints, nerve injury, paralysis, and thromboembolic events.

The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system (Zimmer) was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. The skin under the tourniquet was covered by cast padding. The operated leg was elevated and exsanguinated before inflating the automatic pneumatic tourniquet. There are three main strategies for the use of a tourniquet in TKR: A) inflate before incision and deflate following cement hardening ('skin to cement'); B) inflate prior to cement application and deflated following hardening ('cement only'); C) inflate before incision and deflate following completion of skin closure ('skin to skin'). The optimal timing of tourniquet application during primary TKA is still a matter of debate. Most previous reports have failed to show significant differences among different tourniquet strategies.

Kvederas et al. compared these three strategies in a randomized double-blind clinical trial, and demonstrated that the estimated blood loss was highest when the tourniquet was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening ('cement only'), while inflation of tourniquet before skin incision and its deflation after hardening of cement ('skin to cement') tends to give better early postoperative mobilization. However, this was an interim report with limited number of patients, and only limited outcome parameters were reported, which were insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding the differences in outcome.

Therefore we performed this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a decent sample size to investigate the best tourniquet strategy in TKA. In addition to the blood loss and early postoperative outcomes, we also strictly monitored pain, soft tissue injury, and rehabilitation with a longer follow-up duration up to 6 months.

All of the operations were performed through the medial parapatellar approach by the same experienced joint replacement surgeon. All patients underwent primary TKA with minimally invasive techniques and cemented prostheses (EvolutionTM medial pivot, MicroPort, USA). An intramedullary guide was used for both tibial and femoral cuts.

The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. The skin under the tourniquet was covered by cast padding. The operated leg was elevated and exsanguinated before inflating the automatic pneumatic tourniquet. One of the three tourniquet treatment strategies was used, as determined by the group allocation of the patient. In all the three groups, the tourniquet was inflated to a pressure of 280 mm Hg. The wound was closed after wound irrigation and hemostasis and then was wrapped with elastic bandages. One drainage was applied postoperatively in all patients and was kept until 24h to monitor blood loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients suffer from primary osteoarthritis indicated for total knee arthroplasty
  2. Subject is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations
  3. Subject must have signed an informed consent document specific to the study, and approved by the Ethics Committee, indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject requires a revision knee arthroplasty surgery
  2. Subject is currently on anti-coagulant therapy or has coagulopathy
  3. Subject has peripheral vascular disease of the lower limb evidenced by the presence of blood vessel calcification on the radiographs or the absence of dorsalis pedis/popliteal pulses
  4. Subject suffers from conditions other than primary knee osteoarthritis, e.g. inflammatory arthritis
  5. Subject having associated medical diseases affecting rehabilitation
  6. Subject has active systemic infection or infection near the knee joint
  7. Subject having current medical condition that render them unfit for surgery
  8. Any criterion which in the opinion of the investigator, suggests that the subject would not be compliant with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cement only
The tourniquet was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening
A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Skin to Cement
Inflation of tourniquet before skin incision and its deflation after hardening of cement
A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Skin to Skin
Inflate of tourniquet before incision and deflate following completion of skin closure
A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Loss
Time Frame: 4 days after surgery
We calculated the intraoperative blood loss by measuring the suction volume and weighing the sponges. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels were examined preoperatively, and on Day 1 to Day 4 after surgery. Change of Hb and Hct was calculated as the value of postoperative D1 to D4 minus preoperative value. The number of patients undergoing blood transfusion were recorded. The criterion for a blood transfusion was set as a Hb level of <8 g/dL with symptomatic anemia. The calculated blood loss, which reflects actual blood loss, was determined with use of a previously described method. Briefly, the patients blood volume (PBV) is calculated using a formula, and multiplying the PBV by the change of haematocrit (preoperative value minus value on postoperative Day 2) will give the estimated total blood loss (ETBL).
4 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft-tissue damage
Time Frame: 4 days after surgery
We assessed soft-tissue damage by examining serum C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 4
4 days after surgery
Thigh circumference
Time Frame: 4 days after surgery
Thigh circumference was measured 10 cm proximal to the patella and leg circumference was measured 15 cm distal to the patella, to determine the degree of swelling, and was measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 4. X-rays were taken after surgery to measure the lower limb alignment, and tibial and femoral components position.
4 days after surgery
Postoperative Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained for both knee and thigh pain preoperatively and on postoperative.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Peak Quadriceps Strength
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
The strength of each leg was evaluated by using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque measured in both the concentric and eccentric modes.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Time-up-and-go (TUG) Test
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
he TUG test was used to evaluate the preoperative degree of mobility. This test involves measuring the time a patient needs to get up from a chair, walk three meters, turn, walk back to the chair and then sit down again.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
6-minute Walking Test
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
A test that evaluates the functional capacity of the patient while walking on a flat, hard surface in the 6-minute window. It assess all the systems that are involved in the 6-minute window.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
The BBS test is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Knee Society Knee Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
A knee score that rates only the knee joint itself, there are three main parameters which are pain, stability and the range of motion. Whereas flexion contracture, extension lag and misalignment would be different ways for point deductions. 100 points would refer to a patient with no knee pain, 125 degree range of motion and negligible anteroposterior and mediolateral instability.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
Knee Society Function Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6
A functional score that rates the patient's ability to walk and climb stairs, points would be deducted if the patient uses any walking aids for the two. 100 points would refer to a patient that can walk for an unlimited distance and go up and down the stairs without any trouble.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteo Arthritis Knee

Clinical Trials on Tourniquet

3
Subscribe