Preoperative Psychosocial Support for Postoperative Recovery and Health: Mechanistic Substudy

August 24, 2020 updated by: Adam Hanley, University of Utah
This was a single site, three-arm, parallel group randomized clinical trial that compared the effect of three preoperative psychosocial interventions on knee and hip replacement patients' preoperative pain intensity and postoperative pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and opioid use.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking males or females.
  • 18 years old or older
  • Patients within the University of Utah Hospital system
  • Patients attending Joint Academy to prepare for either hip or knee replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Altered mental status due to delirium, psychosis, or pharmacological sedation as determined by clinical assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness of Pain
Mindfulness of Pain consisted of instruction in how to (1) zoom in to deconstruct pain into its constituent physical sensations and precisely map each sensation's spatial location, (2) use mindful breathing to zoom out and broaden the field of attention to include previously neglected sensory elements (i.e., spaces within the body that were absent of sensation and pleasant sensations), and (3) shift attention from unpleasant sensations to neutral/pleasant sensations or experiences.
Experimental: Mindfulness of Breath
Mindfulness of Breath consisted of instruction in focused attention on the breath and metacognitive monitoring and acceptance of discursive thoughts, negative emotions, and pain.
Active Comparator: Cognitive-Behaviorally Based Pain Psychoeducation
Cognitive-Behaviorally Based Pain Psychoeducation consisted of psychoeducation about the link between thoughts, emotions, and behavior and provided instruction in the use logic to dispute maladaptive thoughts about pain that might otherwise exacerbate pain and distress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Preoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Completed immediately before the preoperative intervention and immediately after the preoperative intervention (i.e., 20 minutes)
Single-item Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the most intense pain imaginable.
Completed immediately before the preoperative intervention and immediately after the preoperative intervention (i.e., 20 minutes)
Change in Postoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.
Single-item Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the most intense pain imaginable.
Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Postoperative Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.
Single-item Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the most unpleasant pain imaginable.
Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.
Change in Postoperative Opioid Use
Time Frame: Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.
Single-item, dichotomously scored (no vs. yes): "Did you take opioid medications in the last 24 hours?"
Completed on the evenings of the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Self-Transcendent State
Time Frame: Completed immediately before the preoperative intervention and immediately after the preoperative intervention (i.e., 20 minutes)
Self-transcendent state was measured with the Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment (NADAs; Hanley, Nakamura, & Garland, 2018). The NADAs is a 3-item, Likert type (0-10) self-report scale specifically designed to measure alterations in the experience of self occasioned by mindfulness practice.
Completed immediately before the preoperative intervention and immediately after the preoperative intervention (i.e., 20 minutes)
Patient Confidence
Time Frame: Completed immediately after the preoperative intervention
Patients' confidence ("How confident are you that you could effectively use this pain management technique?") in using the pain management technique was assessed with a single item rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no confidence and 10 representing complete confidence.
Completed immediately after the preoperative intervention
Patient Intent
Time Frame: Completed immediately after the preoperative intervention
Patients' intent to use the technique ("How likely are you to use this pain management technique?") to use the pain management technique was assessed with a single item rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no intent and 10 representing absolute intent.
Completed immediately after the preoperative intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB_00123611

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness of Breath

Subscribe