Virtually Augmented Self Hypnosis in Peripheral Vascular Interventions

September 27, 2022 updated by: Salah D. Qanadli, MD, PhD

Virtually Augmented Self Hypnosis: Randomized Controlled Trial in Peripheral Vascular Interventions

The aim of our study is to compare patients anxiety and pain during percutaneous vascular interventions with and without virtual reality autohypnosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The participants in the control group will be treated under local anesthesia, following the usual care protocols.

The participants in the experimental group will be treated under the same conditions, except that they will experience virtual reality autohypnosis during the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • CHUV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • > 18 years
  • Any indication for a percutaneous vascular interventional with a single vascular access (angiography, phlebography, arterial intervention, venous intervention) planned to be done under local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No French language comprehension, deaf or visually impaired patient
  • Inability to sign informed consent
  • Need of sedative medication
  • History of motion sickness
  • History of psychiatric disease such as paranoia, schizophrenia, deep water phobia and dementia
  • Patient does not tolerate the virtual reality mask during the pre operative visit at Day 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
Treatment as usual

The Participant arrive in our day care clinic and is prepared as any other patient in interventional radiology. The investigator will collect the signed informed consent form and proceed to randomization.

The participant will then fill the pre and post-operative anxiety and pain questionnaire.

The percutaneous vascular procedure will be performed as usual. Pain and anxiolytic medication are provided if needed during the intervention. Immediately after the intervention, the participant will fill the post-operative anxiety and pain questionnaire. The participant will be instructed to report anxiety and pain felt during the intervention.

A clinical visit at 3 month is conducted as part of the standard clinical protocol. The participant will fill a 3rd questionnaire about the remembered anxiety and pain during the intervention.

Experimental: Autohypnosis
Use of virtual reality with head mounted display

Participant arrive in our day care clinic and is prepared as any other patient in interventional radiology. The investigator will collect the signed informed consent form and proceed to randomization.

The participant will then fill the pre and post-operative anxiety and pain questionnaire.

The percutaneous vascular procedure will be performed as usual except for the virtual reality mask and autohypnosis software that will run during the whole intervention.

Pain and anxiolytic medication are provided if needed during the intervention. Immediately after the intervention, the participant will fill the post-operative anxiety and pain questionnaire. The participant will be instructed to report anxiety and pain felt during the intervention.

A clinical visit at 3 month is conducted as part of the standard clinical protocol. The participant will fill a 3rd questionnaire about the remembered anxiety and pain during the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Per procedural anxiety.
Time Frame: Day 1 (Immediately after the peripheral vascular intervention)

Per procedural anxiety, measured by the Spielberger Anxiety State Inventory in French (Gauthier and Bouchard, 1993).

The Spielberger Anxiety State Inventory is a self questionnaire of 20 items, each item scores from 1 to 4. The result of the test is the sum of the 20 items, therefore the result ranges from 20 to 80. A high score is related to a high level of anxiety at the moment of the test.

Day 1 (Immediately after the peripheral vascular intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Per procedural pain.
Time Frame: Day 1 (Immediately after the peripheral vascular intervention)
Per procedural pain, measured by the visual analog pain scale. The visual analog pain scale rates pain from 0 to 10, 0 being the least pain imaginable and 10 the maximal pain imaginable.
Day 1 (Immediately after the peripheral vascular intervention)
Remembered per procedural anxiety.
Time Frame: 3 months

Remembered per procedural anxiety measured by the Spielberg Anxiety State Inventory in French (Gauthier and Bouchard, 1993).

The Spielberger Anxiety State Inventory is a self questionnaire of 20 items, each item scores from 1 to 4. The result of the test is the sum of the 20 items, therefore the result ranges from 20 to 80. A high score is related to a high level of anxiety at the moment of the test.

3 months
Remembered per procedural pain.
Time Frame: 3 months

Remembered per procedural pain will be measured by the visual analog pain scale.

The visual analog pain scale rates pain from 0 to 10, 0 being the least pain imaginable and 10 the maximal pain imaginable.

3 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 1
Device deficiencies
Day 1
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: Day 90
Amputation, mesenteric or renal ischemia, and death
Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Salah Dine Qanadli, Prof. MD PhD, Unil, CHUV

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe