Effect of Anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training With Visual Biofeedback in Subacute Stroke

November 16, 2020 updated by: Yonsei University

Asymmetric gait patterns of stroke is one of the most important functional activities to enable community participation, it is major goal for stroke patients. Reported that the stroke patients had asymmetry at stance time, single stance, double support time, and swing time compared to normal people, and claimed that the most important factor was step length. According to Albert et al., patients with an asymmetric gait pattern have a long double support phase and a healthy side single support phase, and less weight shift to the affected side. Recent studies have shown that visual feedback for weight shift may be helpful to obtain a symmetrical posture after stroke. However, no study has been conducted on the therapeutic effect on gait asymmetry and patterns. We aimed to investigate the effect of Anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training with Visual Biofeedback in subacute post-stroke patients on gait asymmetry and pattern.

40 subacute post-stroke patients with Step Length Asymmetry were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. The training group received an additional anterioposterior weight shifting training with visual Biofeedback 5 times per week for 4weeks. The control group received the usual gait training. The spatiotemporal and kinematic data were obtained during walking through 3D motion analysis. Functional Ambulation Category, Self-selected walking speed, Maximum safe walking speed, Berg balance Test (BBT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Medical Research Council Score (MRC), Functional Independent Measure-mobility, Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were assessed at pre, during, post- training, and 4week follow-up. Those were compared between two groups by repeated measures ANOVA.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Deog Young Kim
          • Phone Number: +82-2-2228-3714
          • Email: KIMDY@yuhs.ac

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. less than 6 months after onset of the stroke
  2. can stand and walk independently 10m
  3. K-MMSE score of at least 15
  4. have asymmetrical gait pattern with Step length asymmetric ratio greater than 1.1
  5. over 20 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. quadriplegia
  2. past history of stroke
  3. past history of Musculoskeletal disease or history of Neurological diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group
The control group received the usual gait training.
Experimental: Training group

The training group received an additional anterioposterior weight shifting training with visual Biofeedback 5 times per week for 4weeks. AP training is made to instantly know your training status during training by measuring and processing the foot pressure in real time using the F-Scan (Tekscan) hardware system and Software Development Kit (SDK).

Before training, all patients are instructed to place both feet at shoulder width, place the inverted foot approximately 30 cm in front of the unaffected side foot, move the body forward with the chest straight in an upright position, and be instructed to put the weight on the affected side.

On the screen shown, measure the maximum weight distribution during the first 10 times and set the value added by 5% as the target value.

It is designed to induce the maximum weight shift through the archery game.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio
Time Frame: before training(0week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio = paretic step length/non paretic step length
before training(0week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio
Time Frame: during training(2week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio = paretic step length/non paretic step length
during training(2week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio
Time Frame: after training(4week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio = paretic step length/non paretic step length
after training(4week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio
Time Frame: Follow up(8week)
Step Length Asymmetric Ratio = paretic step length/non paretic step length
Follow up(8week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index
Time Frame: before training(0week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index = paretic step length-non paretic step length/0.5[paretic step length +non paretic step length]
before training(0week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index
Time Frame: during training(2week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index = paretic step length-non paretic step length/0.5[paretic step length +non paretic step length]
during training(2week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index
Time Frame: after training(4week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index = paretic step length-non paretic step length/0.5[paretic step length +non paretic step length]
after training(4week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index
Time Frame: Follow up(8week)
Step Length Asymmetric Index = paretic step length-non paretic step length/0.5[paretic step length +non paretic step length]
Follow up(8week)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training with Visual Biofeedback

Subscribe