Postural Analysis During Dental Surgery (PAD)

November 19, 2020 updated by: Giovanni Lodi, University of Milan

Posture Analysis During Dental Surgery Using Visual Markers: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (RCT)

Background: Attention and awareness towards MSDs in the dental profession has increased considerably in recent years. From recent literature reviews, it is learned that prevalence of MSDs in dentists is 64-93%. It has been seen that the use of magnification systems not only improves the operator's visual capabilities, but also allows for a more correct posture, and to prevent the onset of back and neck disorders.

Purpose and methods: Evaluate dentist posture during extraction of third lower molars depending on whether the operator uses the naked eye, surgical loupes or surgical microscope systems. Data will be evaluated through the index RULA (rapid upper limb assesment) to define whether there is a change in exposure to the risk of MSDs (Muskoloskeletal disease) and using fiducial markers for the movement analysis of the operator during the procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design: randomized controlled clinical trial. Purpose: Evaluate dentist posture during extraction of third lower molars depending on whether the operator uses the naked eye, surgical loupes or surgical microscope systems. Methods: Data will be analysed through the index RULA (rapid upper limb assesment) to define whether there is a change in exposure to the risk of MSDs (Muskoloskeletal disease).

Posture assessment will be based on 3-D data of the upper body, which can discriminate spatial displacements up to 2mm in translation and 1 degree in rotation.

The surgical intervention will be performed under local anesthesia (mepivacaine 20 mg/ml with adrenaline 1:100000) and by the use of microscope (OPMI Movena S7) or surgical loupes or no magnifying system.

During this session the following data will be collected for the study:

  1. Demographic data (baseline)
  2. Medical and dental history
  3. Parameters related to the lower third molar
  4. Radiographic tests
  5. Marker operator position
  6. Pre- and postoperative photographs

Each patients will be recalled for follow-up visits at 7 days. During this session will be carried out the removal of stitches and data will be recorded as follows:

  1. VAS pain and trismus.
  2. Number of painkillers taken
  3. Control photographs
  4. Posse Scala

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20142
        • University of Milan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients elements 38 or 48 in dysodontiasis requiring a complex extraction
  • able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • general contraindication to surgical treatment
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • age under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Operating Microscope.

Surgical technique is the same used for extraction of the lower third molar. Patients will be enrolled (baseline) whenever sign their written informed consent to participate to the study, after having read and understand the informative pamphlet.

The intervention will be performed under local anesthesia (mepivacaine 20 mg/ml with adrenaline 1:100000) and by the use of microscope.

At the end of the surgical procedure, all patients will receive a 100mg Nimesulide cpr and apply the ice pack on the cheek.

At the end of each procedure will give post-operative instructions for all patients and prescribe an antiseptic therapy with chlorhexidine coll. 0.2% 3 times/ day for 10 days from the day following the intervention and anti-inflammatory therapy Nimesulide 100 mg cpr to take up to 2 times / day for up to 4 days.

Each patients will be recalled for follow-up visits at 7 days.

Third molar extraction using microscope
Active Comparator: Surgical Loupes with coaxial illumination.
The same as above but the intervention will be performed with the use of surgical loupes
Third molar extraction using loupes with co-axial illumination
Active Comparator: Naked Eye.
The same as above but the intervention will be performed at naked eyes
Third molar extraction using naked eyes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posture and fatiguing positions
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure (one frame every second during the intervention)

Specific postural analysis using fiducial markers: a set of markers on the back of a tight T-shirt worn by the dentist during the whole operation will be acquired using a 5 MPixels camera at 2 fps.

We will place the markers in order to focus our analysis on the following parameter: the neck position with respect to the trunk, the trunk orientation with respect to the vertical axis, the twist and bending of the neck and back, the overall static position duration of the neck and the back.

The rotation angles of every marker will be extracted and stored for every frame of the recorder video.

During the surgical procedure (one frame every second during the intervention)
Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA)
Time Frame: After the operative performance, an average 15 minutes
Evaluation tool for ergonomic investigations of workplaces. Values are expressed as RULA scores.
After the operative performance, an average 15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giovanni Lodi, PhD, DMD, University of Milan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PAD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe