Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Versus Standard or Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation, in Early Breast Cancer, After Breast-conserving Surgery (LAPIDARY)

March 4, 2021 updated by: Eduardo Barbieri, Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Cancer

Clinical Trial, Randomized, Open Label, With an Active Comparator to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Using Accelerated Partial Irradiation Versus Standard or Hypofractionated Irradiation of the Entire Breast in Patients With Initial Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery

Radiotherapy has been confirmed as an important treatment breast-conserving surgery reducing the risk of any recurrence of breast cancer and breast cancer-related mortality in patients with early breast cancer.

There are no comparative data on the ideal radiotherapy treatment regimen for patients with early stage breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery in the Brazilian population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a prospective, randomized, pilot study, with active control, to evaluate the viability and safety of accelerated partial breast irradiation, in 5 fractions, comparing with the radiotherapy regimens of the whole breast in 15 and 5 fractions, in patients with breast cancer, in initial stage, who underwent conservative surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 03102-002
        • Recruiting
        • IBCC Oncologia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eduardo Barbieri
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Information to the patient and signed informed consent;
  • Women aged ≥50 years
  • Breast conserving surgery
  • Pathologic tumor size < 3 cm (maximum microscopic diameter of the invasive component)
  • Invasive adenocarcinoma (except classic invasive lobular carcinoma)
  • Unifocal disease
  • Histopathologic grades I or II
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1
  • Lymphovascular invasion absent
  • Negative axillary lymph nodes
  • Minimum microscopic margins of non-cancerous tissue of 2mm (excluding deep margin when in deep fascia)
  • No prior breast or mediastinal radiotherapy
  • No hematogenous metastases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer)
  • Mastectomy
  • Classical-Type Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor-type 2 positive (HER2+)
  • Triple-negative breast cancers
  • Intravascular lymphoma present
  • Contraindications to radiotherapy.
  • No geographical, social or psychologic reasons that would prevent study follow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Standard
Whole breast Radiotherapy, 40 Gray (40Gy) fractions
Radiation: Whole Breast Irradiation + Boost Whole breast, either 40Gy, in 15 fractions, in 3 weeks
Experimental: Experimental 1: Hypofractionated radiotherapy
Whole breast Radiotherapy, 26 Gray (26Gy) in 5 fractions
Radiation: Hypofractionated irradiation Whole Breast Irradiation 26Gy in 5 fractions in one week
Experimental: Experimental 2: Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Partial Breast Irradiation 26 Gray (26Gy) to the tumor bed in 5 fractions.
Radiation: Accelerated partial breast irradiation Tumor bed 26Gy in 5 fractions, in 5 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of local recurrence
Time Frame: 5 years
To estimate and compare the rate of local recurrence between the experimental and control arms.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to occurrence of distant metastases
Time Frame: 5 years
Distant tumor time is defined as number of days from randomization until occurrence of distant metastases, death without prior distant progression, or end of follow-up.
5 years
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Disease-free survival, defined as number of days from randomization until the first occurrence of local recurrence, distant metastases, tumor-related death, death without prior progression, or end of follow-up.
5 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Overall survival time, defined as number of days from randomization until death or end of follow-up.
5 years
Medico-economic study
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate and compared the cost between Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation with Standard and Hypofractionated irradiation
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate the patients quality of life with the help of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This questionnaire was designed to be cancer specific, multidimensional in structure, suitable for self-administration (brief and easy to complete), and applicable in a wide range of cultural contexts. The scores in each dimension are uniformly transformed to dimensions ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the negative (low functioning, high symptom burden) and 100 the positive end (high functioning, low symptom burden) of the continuum.
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Evaluation of quality of life change by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate the patient quality of life with the help of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23). The 23-item EORTC QLQ BR23 contains two breast cancer specific functional scales (body image and sexuality) and three symptom scales evaluating arm symptoms, breast symptoms, and systemic therapy symptoms. The minimum and maximum values are 0 and 100, and higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Fatigue Questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue - FACT-F)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate the patient quality of life with the help of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F). Scores are interpreted according to the guidelines of the Scoring Manual. The higher the number of points, the better the quality of life. To obtain the score, the negative questions are reverted; then the answers of the domains are added up, and a proportional average is carried out in case of non answered items.
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Measurement Satisfaction of Body Image of the participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate the patient quality of life and patient satisfaction with the help of the Body Image Scale (BIS). Scores are interpreted according to the guidelines of the Scoring Manual. The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a self-assessment scale designed to assess cancer patients' perceptions of their appearance and identify any changes to those perceptions resulting from a disease or a treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score means a higher level of body image disturbance.
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Changes in anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
To evaluate the patient quality of life and patient satisfaction with the help of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores for each sub scale (depression and anxiety) are summed-up and range from 0 to 21. Values from 0-7 indicate normal levels, 8-10 are border values and values from 11-21 are considered to be pathological.
Baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment end
Early and late adverse effects in normal tissues
Time Frame: 5 years
To evaluate the results reported by patient and evaluated by doctors, as well as, photographic assessments.
5 years
Late adverse effects
Time Frame: 5 years
To evaluate if the patient had symptoms of swelling or edema in the arm, breast shrinkage, hardness, pigmentation, necrosis, pain and tenderness in the breast.
5 years
Acute toxicity rate
Time Frame: 5 years
To evaluate acute toxicity rate. The maximum grade for acute toxicity will be recorded for each patient at each treatment evaluation using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 7, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38341220.8.0000.0072

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The findings will be shared and discussed with all investigators in the study. A study manuscript, having received contributions from all authors, will be submitted for publication in scientific circles.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Neoplasm of Breast

Clinical Trials on Active Comparator: Standard

Subscribe