Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

March 2, 2021 updated by: Shadwa Rabea Mohamed, Minia University

Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The patients were randomly allocated into 3 parallel groups of 20 patients in each group by using computer generated tables. group(Q):received bilateral sonar-guided quadratus lumborum bolck using 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%on each side.group(E): received bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae block using 20 ml bupivaciane 0.25%on each side. group(C):didn't received any block

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

on arrival to the operative room all patients were monitored with standared monitoring. then IV cannula were inserted. preoxygenation with 100% oxygen and induction of GA by 1mic/kg fentanyl and 2 mg/kg of 1%propofol. endotracheal intubation was facilitated by 0.5mg/kg of atracurium. isoflurane 1-2% with oxygen was used for anesthetic maintenance and 0.15 mg/kg intermittent doses of atracurium to maintain adequate muscle relaxation. ventilation was controlled to maintain end tidal CO2 at 35-40 mmHg and SaO2 between 95-100. after stabilization of the patient's hemodynamics and before surgical incision, quadratus lumborum and erector Spinae block were performed according to patient's group by the same anesthetist with the patient in lateral or prone position respectively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Minya, Egypt, 61111
        • Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American society of anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status1and2 scheduled for elective cholecystectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to studed drugs
  • morbid obesity
  • patient refusal
  • infection at the side of the bolck
  • emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • if laparoscopic procedure converted to open

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Quadratus lumborum block
received bilateral ultrasound-guided Quadratus lumborum block using 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% on each side
bilateral ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block was done in the lateral decubitus and linear or curvilinear probe was used according to the depth and placed in the midaxillary line in the transverse plane above the iliac crest
Active Comparator: Erector spinae block
received bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae block using 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% on each side
bilateral ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block was done in the lateral decubitus and linear or curvilinear probe was used according to the depth and placed in the midaxillary line in the transverse plane above the iliac crest
No Intervention: Control
didn't received any block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time of first postoperative analgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hours
first time that patient need analgesia and visual analogue scale more than 3
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Abeer Hassaneen, MD, Assistant Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 135-12/2018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Analgesia

Clinical Trials on nerve block

Subscribe