His Pacing Feasibility and Cardiac Electrical Activation

February 1, 2021 updated by: Anna Margrethe Thoegersen, Aalborg University Hospital

His Pacing in Patients Without Need for Cardiac Resynchronization - Clinical Feasibility and Cardiac Electrical Activation

This study will examine the clinical feasibility of His pacing in patients with expected high demand for ventricular pacing and no established indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Secondarily, examine differences in electrical and mechanical cardiac activation between traditional pacing and His pacing.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all eligible patients giving written consent will be included. The study is a clinical single-center interventional study. The patients (n = 25) need to have an expected high demand for ventricular pacing and no established class I indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy. They will receive a pacemaker implant with a traditional right ventricular pacing lead and an additional His pacing lead in a basal high septal position at the level of the proximal electrical conduction system (His). An atrial lead is implanted if dual chamber pacing is needed. All leads are connected to a biventricular pacemaker with the His lead in the LV port. Postoperatively, the baseline examinations will include: transthoracic echocardiography, 12-lead ECG with a 3D photography of the chest wall to document ECG electrode location, and a contrast-enhanced cardiac CT scan. The echocardiography and ECG will be performed during traditional right ventricular pacing only and His pacing only. His pacing will be used as the permanent programming of choice if feasible during follow up. The CT scan is used for documenting the final positions of the pacing leads and to create a patient-specific 3D model of the cardiac electrical activation using a software which enables merging of a CT scan and ECG and a CT chest photography. During follow up (1-3 and 12 months), transthoracic echocardiography, 12-lead ECG and 3D chest photography are repeated for assessment of mechanical and electrical function during pacing. The performance of all implanted pacing lead will be evaluated at each follow up visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Anna M Thøgersen, MD DMSc
  • Phone Number: +4597664427
  • Email: anmat@rn.dk

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jacob M Larsen, MD PhD
  • Phone Number: +4597664456
  • Email: jaml@rn.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent pacemaker indication with expected high demand of right ventricular pacing (>40%) and left ventricular ejection fraction >40%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No class I indication for CRT pacemaker (HRS 2018 Pacing Guidelines)
  • Hemodynamically unstable patients
  • Severely reduced kidney function
  • Former serious adverse reactions to contrast media
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Severe psychiatric disorder which can compromise compliance with protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: His Pacing
Implant of a supplementary His pacing lead in addition to a traditional RV pacing lead.
The patients will receive a pacemaker implant with a traditional right ventricular pacing lead and an additional His pacing lead in a basal high septal position at the level of the proximal electrical conduction system (His). An atrial lead is implanted if dual chamber pacing is needed. All leads are connected to a biventricular pacemaker with the His lead in the LV port.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of chronic His pacing success
Time Frame: Evaluated at 1 year follow up
Chronic His capture with clinically acceptable pacing threshold (<=3.5V)
Evaluated at 1 year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of perioperative His pacing success
Time Frame: The implant procedure duration i.e. incision to skin closure
Perioperative his capture with clinically acceptable pacing threshold (<=3.5V)
The implant procedure duration i.e. incision to skin closure
QRS duration (ms)
Time Frame: Implantation to 1 year follow up
Comparing His pacing and RV pacing
Implantation to 1 year follow up
Changes in left ventricular echocardiographic two-dimensional strain dyssynchrony parameters
Time Frame: Implant to 1 year follow up
Comparing left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony during His pacing and RV pacing using echocardiographic two-dimensional longitudinal strain
Implant to 1 year follow up
Changes in regional right and left ventricular electrical activation delay
Time Frame: Implant to 1 year follow up
Comparing electrical activation pattern during His pacing and RV pacing using non-invasive electroanatomical mapping. This is achieved using software that merges data from a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), chest wall three-dimensional picture of ECG lead positions, and a cardiac computed tomography scan.
Implant to 1 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sam Riahi, MD PhD, Aalborg University Hospital
  • Study Director: Peter Søgaard, MD DMSc, Aalborg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N-20200032

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe